Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of laparoscopic and open treatment of acute cholecystitis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A retrospective review of 200 patients with acute cholecystitis, half of whom underwent open cholecystectomy and half of whom underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, was performed. The two groups were compared for demographic characteristics, operative course, cost of intervention, and surgical outcome. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was accomplished with an acceptable morbidity and provided an earlier release from the hospital and return to normal activities with a significant economic savings as compared to the traditional open approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berci G, Sackier JM (1991) The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 382–384

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, et al (1991) The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 385–387

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Scovill WA, et al (1991) The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 161: 388–392

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gadacz TR, Talamini MA (1991) Traditional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 336–338

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glenn OF (1981) Biliary tract disease. Surg Gyn & Obs 153: 401–402

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman GR, Hunter JG (1991) Results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital. Am J Surg 162: 576–579

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luna GK, Heimbach DM, Olson H, et al (1986) Hospital stay following biliary tract surgery. A comparison of two community hospitals. Arch Surg 121: 693–669

    Google Scholar 

  8. McSherry CK (1989) Cholecytectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg 158: 174–178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moss G, Regal ME, Lichtig L (1986) Reducing postoperative pain, narcotics, and length of hospitalization. Surg 99: 206–210

    Google Scholar 

  10. Munoz E, Tinker MA, Margolis I et al (1984) Surgonomics: The Cost of Cholecystectomy. Surg 96: 642–664

    Google Scholar 

  11. Olsen DO (1991) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 339–344

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, et al (1991) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis of 100 initial patients. Ann Surg 213: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ponsky JL (1991) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 161: 393–395

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sackier JM, Berci G (1990) Diagnostic and interventional laparoscopy for the general surgeon. Contemp Surg 37(4): 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scher KS, Scott-Conner CE (1987) Complications of biliary surgery. Am Surg 53: 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sullivan DM, Hood TR, Griffen WO Jr (1982) Biliary tract surgery in the elderly. Am J Surg 143: 218–220

    Google Scholar 

  17. Unger SW, Edelman DS, Scott JS, et al (1991) Laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vitale GC, Collet D, Larson GM, et al (1991) Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among french and american patients. Am J Surg 161: 396–398

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vogt DP (1987) The biliary system. In: Davies JH (ed) Clinical surgery. CV Mosby Co, St. Louis, pp 1637–1680

    Google Scholar 

  20. Way J (1987) Gallstone disease. In: Way J, Pellegrini D (ed) Surgery of gallbladder and bile ducts. WB Saunders, Philadelphia pp 256–264

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unger, S.W., Rosenbaum, G., Unger, H.M. et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and open treatment of acute cholecystitis. Surg Endosc 7, 408–411 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311731

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311731

Key words

Navigation