Skip to main content
Log in

Neural tissue compatibility of Teflon as an implant material for microvascular decompression

  • Basic Research
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Teflon is utilized in neurosurgery as well as in plastic, vascular and heart surgery. Although the effect of Teflon on different types of cells and tissues has been previously studied, we are not aware of any study in which the effect of Teflon was tested on cells of the central nervous system. We have therefore examined the tissue compatibility of spongy and fibrous Teflon by directly exposing the Teflon to dissociated cerebellar cells containing both glia and neurons in tissue culture. Daily examination of the growth of the cells adjacent to Teflon fibers using an inverted phase contrast microscope revealed that Teflon has little or no effect on the growth of these cells. When the cells are fixed after 7 days in culture and stained by the Jenner-Giemsa method, adhesion of both glia and neurons to the surface of the Teflon was seen. Attachment of neural cells to the Teflon was not extensive, as was shown by indirect immunofluorescence technique in connection with double-label staining with anti-GFAP as glia marker and anti-M6 as mouse neuron marker. Thus, these experiments show that Teflon is relatively inert when used as an implant in the central nervous system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American National Standard: ANSI, ASTM-F649 (1978) 711–714

  2. Ammar, A, S Kobayashi, K Sugita, Y Shimizu: Tissue compatibility of ceramics as compared with other implant materials by means of tissue culture. Proceedings of the First Orthopedic Ceramics Implant Meetings. Japanese Orthopedic Ceramics Assoc. Osaka (1981) 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ammar, A: Tissue compatibility of different intracranial implant materials: in vivo and in-vitro studies. Acta Neurochirur 72 (1984) 45–59

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bignami, A, LF Eng, D Dahl, CT Uyeda: Localization of the glial fibrillary acidic protein in astrocytes by immunofluorescence. Brain Res 43 (1972) 429–435

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boone, CW, JB Jacobs: Sarcomas routinely produced from putatively nontumorigenic cells by subcutaneous inoculation attached to plastic platelets. J Supramol Struct 5 (1976) 131–137

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd, LK, S Schmidt, TR Pippert, SA Hite, WV Sharp: The effect of pore size and endothelial cell seeding upon the performance of small diameter e-PTFF vascular grafts under controlled flow conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 22 (1988) 163–177

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cavallini, G, M Lanfredi, M Lodi, M Govoni, M Pampolini: Detection and measurement of a cellular immune-reactivity towards polyester and polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Acta Chir Scand 153 (1987) 179–184

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cuadros, CL, CE Granatir: Nerve regeneration through a (synthetic microporous tube expanded) polytetrafluoroethylene: experimental study in the sciatic nerve of the rat. Microsurgery 8 (1987) 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eng, LF, JJ Vanderhaeghen, A Bignami, B Gerstl: An acidic protein isolated from fibrous astrocytes. Brain Res 28 (1971) 351–354

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ericksson, AS, LM Bjursten, LE Ericson, P Thomsen: Hollow implants in soft tissue allowing quantitative studies of cells and fluid at the implant interface. Biomaterials 9 (1988) 86–90

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman, MD, RT Sataloff, HY Chio, SK Ballas: Compatibility of autologous fibrin adhesive with implant materials. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 114 (1988) 182–185

    Google Scholar 

  12. Granstrom, L, L Backman, SE Dahlgren: Tissue reaction of polypropylene and polyester in obese patients. Biomaterials 7 (1986) 455–458

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hasson, JE, DH Wiebe, WM Abbott: Adult human vascular endothelial cell attachment and migration on novel bioabsorbable polymers. Arch Surg 122 (1987) 428–430

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter, SK, JR Scott, D Hull, RL Urry: The gamete and embryo compatibility of various synthetic polymers. Fertl Steril 50 (1988) 110–116

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jannetta, PJ: Neurovascular compression in cranial nerve and systemic disease. Ann Surg 192 (1980) 518–521

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jannetta, PJ: Hemifacial spasm. In: Samii, M, PJ Sannetta (eds): The cranial nerved. Heidelberg, West Germany, Springer-Verlag (1981) 484–493

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jannetta, PJ: Microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm. In: Brackman, DE (ed): Neurological surgery of the ear and skull base. New York, Raven Press (1982) 49–54

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jannetta, PJ: Neurogenic hypertension: etiology and surgical treatment. I. Observations in 53 patients. Ann Surg 201 (1985) 391–398

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jannetta, PJ, MB Møller, AR Møller, LN Sekhar: Neurosurgical treatment of vertigo by microvascular decompression of the eight cranial nerve. Clin Neurosurg 33 (1986) 645–665

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lagenaur, C, M Schachner: Monoclonal antibody (M2) to glial and neuronal cell surface. J Supramol Struct Cell Biochem 15 (1981) 335–346

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lagenaur, C, M Schachner, D Solter, B Knowles: Monoclonal antibody against SSEA-1 is specific for a subpopulatins of astrocytes in mouse cerebellum. Neurosci Let 31 (1982) 181–184

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lawrence, WH, JE Turner, J Autian: Reevaluation of plastic tubings currently used in medical and paramedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res 3 (1969) 291–300

    Google Scholar 

  23. Legeais, JM, G Renard: Keratoprotese: etude D'un supporten polytetrafluoroethylene expanse. J Fr Ophthalmol Lo 517 (1987) 425–433

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lund, RD, VH Perry, CF Lagenaur: Cell surface changes in the developing optic nerve of mice. J Comp Neurol 247 (1986) 439–446

    Google Scholar 

  25. McAuslan, BR, G Johnson: Cell responses to biomaterials. I: Adhesion and growth of vascular endothelial cells on poly (hydroxyethyl methacrylate) following surface modification by hydrolytic etching. J Biomed Mater Res 21 (1987) 921–935

    Google Scholar 

  26. Menard, S, GD Porta. Incidence, growth and antigenicity of fibrisarcomas induced by Teflon disc in mice. Tumor I 62 (1976) 565–573

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schmitzer, J, M Schachner: Expression of Thy-1, H-2, and NS-4 cell surface antigen and tetanus toxin receptors in early postnatal and adult mouse cerebellum. J Neuroimmunol 1 (1981) 429–456

    Google Scholar 

  28. Taylor, DE, JE Penhallow: Comparative biotolerance of polyacrylamide-agarose gel. Silicone rubber and microporous PTFE as soft tissue implants. Biomaterials 7 (1986) 277–282

    Google Scholar 

  29. Uretzky, G, J Appelbaum, J Sela: Inhibition of the inductive activity of demineralized bone matrix by different percutaneous implants. Biomaterials 9 (1988) 195–197

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wilsnack, RE: Quantitative cell culture biocompatibility testing of medical devices and correlation to animal tests. Biomat Med Dev Art Org 4 (1976) 235–261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ammar, A., Lagenaur, C. & Jannetta, P. Neural tissue compatibility of Teflon as an implant material for microvascular decompression. Neurosurg. Rev. 13, 299–303 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346368

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346368

Keywords

Navigation