Skip to main content
Log in

Posterior skull surgery in craniosynostosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1984, two young infants with unusual “clover-leaf” patterns of skull deformity were treated by posterior skull-releasing surgery that dramatically improved their overall skull shape, to the extent that further operative intervention was not required. This focused our attention on the posterior skull and its role in craniosynostosis. In cases of multi-suture craniosynostosis and craniofacial syndromes severely raised intracranial pressure is frequent, demanding early surgery. One of the problems identified with such surgery undertaken before 6 months of age is recurrent craniosynostosis needing later re-operation. This occurred in 15 (5%) of 275 patients treated between 1978 and 1994. Since 1986, in the presence of significantly raised intracranial pressure it has been our policy to do an initial posterior skull release or decompression. This takes the pressure of the growing brain away from the orbits, allowing us to defer fronto-orbital advancement until the age of 12 months or later. Three patients managed in this way completely avoided anterior surgery, while in another 9 patients re-operation for recurrent anterior deformity has not been required. The exception to this policy has been the presence of severe exorbitism posing a threat to vision. Under these circumstances early fronto-orbital advancement is mandatory, and an additional posterior skull release may be helpful later. Debate continues especially on the management of unilateral lambdoid synostosis. The recent increase in positional posterior plagiocephaly, possibly related to supine nursing of newborns, has emphasised the need to differentiate between a fixed deformity, which might require surgical correction, and positional moulding of the occiput, which improves spontaneously. This paper reports our experience with 22 patients treated by posterior skull surgery, either alone or as an additional procedure, which we believe has a definitive role in the management of craniosynostosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Infant Positioning and SIDS (1992).Pediatrics 89:1120–1126

    Google Scholar 

  2. Argentina LC, David LR, Wilson JA, Bell, WO (1996) An increase in infant cranial deformity with supine sleeping position. J Craniofac Surg 7:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cinalli G, Renier D, Sebag G, Sainte-Rose C, Arnaud E, Pierre-Kahn A (1995). Chronic tonsillar herniation in Crouzon's and Apert's syndromes: the role of premature synostosis of the lambdoid suture. J Neurosurg 83:575–582

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F (1992) Craniosynostosis: surgical treatment during the first year of life. J Neurosurg Sci 36:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldin JH (1989) The timing of surgical treatment for severe craniosynostosis. In: Caronni E (ed) Craniofacial surgery, vol. 3. Proceedings of the II International Congress of the International Society of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Florence, 1989, pp 307–309

  6. Hinton DR, Becker LE, Muakkassa KF, Hoffman HJ (1984) Lambdoid synostosis. 1. The lambdoid suture: normal development and pathology of “synostosis”. J Neurosurg 61:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaiser G (1984) The clinical significance of bilateral synostosis of the lambdoid suture and the usefulness of its treatment. Child's Brain 11:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leboucq N, Montoya P, Martinez Y, Castan P, Bourbotte G (1993) Lambdoid craniosynostosis. A 3D-computerized tomographic approach. J Neuroradiol 20:24–33

    Google Scholar 

  9. McComb JG (1991) Treatment of functional lambdoid synostosis. Neurosurg Clin North Am 2:665–672

    Google Scholar 

  10. Muakkassa KF, Hoffman HJ, Hinton DR, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP, Ash J (1984) Lambdoid synostosis. 2. Review of cases managed at The Hospital for Sick Children, 1972–1982. J Neurosurg 61:340–347

    Google Scholar 

  11. Persing JA, Delashaw JB, Jane JA, Edgerton MT (1988) Lambdoid synostosis: surgical considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg 81:852–860

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thaller SR, Hoyt J, Boggan J (1992) Surgical correction of unilateral lambdoid synostosis: occipital rotation flap. J Craniofac Surg 3:12–17; discussion 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turk AE, McCarthy JG, Thorne CHM, Wisoff JH (1996) The “back to sleep campaign” and deformational plagiocephaly: is there cause for concern? J Craniofac Surg 7:12–18

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vander Kolk CA, Carson BS (1994) Lambdoid synostosis. Clin Plast Surg 21:575–584

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vander Kolk CA, Carson BS, Robertson BC, Manson PN (1993) The occipital bar and internal osteotomies in the treatment of lambdoidal synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 4:112–118

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wall SA, Goldin JH, Hockley AD, Wake MJC, Poole MD, Briggs M (1994) Fronto-orbital re-operation in craniosynostosis. Br J Plast Surg 47:180–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sgouros, S., Goldin, J.H., Hockley, A.D. et al. Posterior skull surgery in craniosynostosis. Child's Nerv Syst 12, 727–733 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00366158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00366158

Key words

Navigation