Skip to main content
Log in

Urethral closure function in women with prolapse

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 19 patients with different types of severe descensus, all without clinical evidence of stress incontinence, urethral stress pressure profiles and stress tests were done before and after repositioning of the prolapse. In 13 of the 19 patients, continence was artificial, because during repositioning they showed leakage of urine; however, 6 of the patients remained continent. The pressure transmission ratios decreased in different parts of the urethra in all the patients when repositioning with a gynecological speculum was done. The drop was most significant in those patients who lost urine after repositioning, showing poor urethral function. In women with genito-urinary prolapse, a test of urethral function is essential, even if there is no clinical evidence of incontinence after removal of the descensus. In cases of severe stress incontinence under this condition, a procedure for bladder neck stabilization should be added to routine prolapse surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calatroni CJ, Poliak A, Kohan A. A roentgenologic study of stress incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962; 83:649–656

    Google Scholar 

  2. Green TH. Development of a plan for the diagnosis and treatment of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962; 83: 632–648

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA. Predicting postoperative urinary incontinence development in women undergoing operation for genitourinary prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158:1171–1175

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hodgkinson CP. Stress urinary incontinence — 1970. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970; 108:1141–1168

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold EP, Webster JR, Looser H, et al. Urodynamics of female incontinence: factors influencing the results of surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 117:805–813

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bump RC, Copeland WE, Hurt WG, Fantl JA. Dynamic urethral pressure/profilometry pressure transmission ratio determinations in stress incontinence and stress continent subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159:749–755

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eberhard J. Standardisierte Urethradruckmessung mit Normwerten zur Streßinkontinenzdiagnostik. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 1986; 46: 145–150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tanagho EA. Urodynamics: cystometry and the urethral closure pressure profile. In: Ostergard DR, ed. Gynecologic urology and urodynamics, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1980:65–86

    Google Scholar 

  9. Green TH. Urinary stress incontinence: differential diagnosis, pathology, and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122: 368–400

    Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson DA, Bent AE, Ostergard DR. The effect of uterovaginal prolapse on urethrovesical pressure dynamics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 146:910–905

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hertogs K, Stanton SL. Mechanism of urinary continence after colposuspension: barrier studies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 1184–1188

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iosif CS. Operative treatment of women with prolapse and genuine primary stress incontinence. Urol Int 1983; 38:199–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Gregorio, G., Hillemanns, H.G. Urethral closure function in women with prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 1, 143–145 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376600

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376600

Keywords

Navigation