Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of abdominal CT imaging with autopsy findings in patients with malignant tumors

  • Original Papers
  • Clinical Oncology or Epidemiology
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The value of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing localized involvement of liver, pancreas, adrenals, and lymph nodes was evaluated in 117 patients with suspected or known malignant tumors by correlation with autopsy findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT for localized liver disease was calculated to be 80% (84%), 96% (97%), and 90% (92%); for pancreatic tumors: 81% (86%), 98% (100%), and 95% (97%); for adrenal tumors: 65% (92%), 100% (100%), and 92% (98%); and for lymph node enlargement 75 (88%), 97% (98%), and 87% (94%), respectively. Results of routine evaluation could be improved, especially in the adrenal region, when scans were reevaluated by highly experienced examiners (results given in parenthesis). Computed tomography is a highly valuable diagnostic tool in the primary diagnosis and in the follow-up of tumor patients. The high costs are offset by a reduction in invasive procedures and a shortened hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams HL, Siegelman SS, Adams DF, Sanders R, Finberg HJ, Hessel SJ, McNeil BJ (1982) Computed tomography versus ultrasound of the adrenal gland: a prospective Study. Radiology 143:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartolozzi C, Ciatti S, Lucarella E, Villari N, Dominicis R de (1981) Ultrasound and computer tomography in the evaluation of focal liver disease. Acta Radiol (Diagn) 22:545–548

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berland LL, Lawson TL, Foley WD, Melrose BL, Chintapalli KN, Taylor AJ (1982) Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses. AJR 138:853–858

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buck J, Heuck F (1984) Computertomographie bei primären und sekundären Tumoren der Nebennieren. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 109:1494–1499

    Google Scholar 

  5. Castellino RA, Marglin SI (1982) Imaging of abdominal and pelvic lymph nodes; lymphography or computed tomography? Invest Radiol 17:433–443

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chapman GS, Kumar D, Redmond J, Munderloh SH, Gandara DR (1984) Upper abdominal computerized tomography scanning in staging non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 54:1541–1543

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunnick NR, Schaner EG, Doppman JL, Strott CA, Gill JR, Javadpour N (1979) Computed tomography in adrenal tumors. AJR 132:43–46

    Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein RJ, Macintosh PK, Oliver B, Levi JA (1984) Computed tomography of intraperitoneal malignancy. Aust NZ J Med 14:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fiegler W, Wegener OH, Hartmann K, Felix R (1980) Computertomographie und Sonographie Vergleichsstudie bei Erkrankungen des Oberbauchs und des Retroperitonealraumes. Fortschr Röntgenstr 132:262–271

    Google Scholar 

  10. Glazer HS, Weyman PJ, Sagel SS, Levitt RG, McClennan BL (1982) Nonfunctioning adrenal masses: Incidental discovery on computed tomography. AJR 139:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gmelin E, Weiss H-D, Fuchs HD, Reiser M (1981) Vergleich der diagnostischen Treffsicherheit von Ultraschall, Computertomographie und ERCP bei der chronischen Pankreatitis und beim Pankreascarcinom. Fortschr Röntgenstr 134:136–141

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hessel SJ, Siegelman SS, McNeil BJ, Sanders R, Adams DF, Alderson PO, Finburg HJ, Abrams HL (1982) A prospective evaluation of computed tomography and ultrasound of the pancreas. Radiology 143:129–133

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hübener KH (1978) Computertomographische Densitometrie von Leber, Milz und Nieren bei intravenös verabreichten lebergängigen Kontrastmitteln in Bolusform. Fortschr Röntgenstr 129:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  14. Husband JE (1985) Role of the CT scanner in the management of cancer. Br Med J 290:527–530

    Google Scholar 

  15. Itai Y, Nishikawa J, Tasaka A (1979) Computed tomography in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 131:165–170

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson RJ, Bleckledge G, Eddleston B, Crowther D (1983) Abdomino-pelvic computed tomography in the management of ovarian carcinoma. Radiology 146:447–452

    Google Scholar 

  17. Korobkin M, White EA, Kressel HY, Moss AA, Montagne J-P (1979) Computed tomography in the diagnosis of adrenal disease. AJR 132:231–238

    Google Scholar 

  18. Korobkin M (1981) Computed tomography of the retroperitoneal vasculature and lymph nodes. Semin Roentgenol 16:251–267

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lammer J, Lepuschütz H, Sager WD, Kratochvil P, Brandstätter G, Zalaudek G (1980) ERCP und CT in der Diagnostik von chronischer Pankreatitis, Pseudozysten und Pankreaskarzinom — ein Vergleich. Röntgenblätter 33:602–611

    Google Scholar 

  20. McMillan JH, Levine E, Stephens RH (1982) Computed tomography in the evaluation of metastatic adenocarcinoma from an unknown primary site. Radiology 143:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moss AA, Federle M, Shapiro HA, Ohto H, Goldberg H, Korobkin M, Clemett R (1980) The combined use of computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the assessment of suspected pancreatic neoplasm: a blind clinical evaluation. Radiology 134:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nielsen ME, Heaston DK, Dunnick NR, Korobkin M (1982) Preoperative CT evaluation of adrenal glands in non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. AJR 139:317–320

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ohnhäuser WP (1981) Optimierung der computertomographischen Diagnostik von Leberläsionen nach intravenöser Zufuhr eines nierengängigen Kontrastmittels in Bolusform. Dissertation, Universität Düsseldorf

  24. Pagani JJ (1983) Normal adrenal glands in small cell lung carcinoma — CT-guided biopsy. AJR 140:949–951

    Google Scholar 

  25. Peters PE, Beyer K (1985) Querdurchmesser normaler Lymphknoten in verschiedenen anatomischen Regionen und ihre Bedeutung für die computertomographische Diagnostik. Radiologe 25:193–198

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rubenstein WA, Auh YH, Kazam E (1984) Computed tomography of the abdomen. Adv Surg 17:171–196

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scherer U, Lissner J, Brall B, Eisenburg J, Zrenner M, Schildberg F-W (1979) Computertomographie der Leber. Treffsicherheit der Methode bei bioptisch gesicherten Diagnosen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 130:531–535

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schneider GH, STeiner H, Ebner F (1985) Raumfordernde Prozesse der Nebennieren — Diagnostischer Stellenwert der Methoden. Röntgenblätter 38:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schoppe WD, Jungblut RM (1982) Stellenwert der Computertomographie in der Diagnostik gastrointestinaler Erkrankungen. Z Gastroenterol 20:9–28

    Google Scholar 

  30. Snow JH, Goldstein HM, Wallace S (1979) Comparison of scintigraphy, sonography and computed tomography in the evaluation of hepatic neoplasms. AJR 132:915–918

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thurn P, Büchler E (1982) Einführung in die Röntgendiagnostik. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weyman PJ, Glazer HS (1983) Adrenals. In: Lee Ykt, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ (eds) Computed body tomography. Raven Press, New York, p 379

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wittenberg J (1983) Computed tomography of the body. N Engl J Med 309:1160–1165 and 1224–1229

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wolfman NT, Karstaedt N, Kawamoto EH (1985) Pleomorphic carcinoma of the pancreas: computed-tomographic, sonographic and pathologic findings. Radiology 154:329–332

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winkelmann, M., Schoppe, W.D., Volk, N. et al. Correlation of abdominal CT imaging with autopsy findings in patients with malignant tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 113, 279–284 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396386

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396386

Key words

Navigation