Skip to main content
Log in

Increased response switching, perseveration and perseverative switching following d-amphetamine in the rat

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four experiments examined the effects of d-amphetamine on response switching and perseveration in apparatus allowing a choice of response location. The relative ‘cost’ of a switch between two response locations and repetitive responding at a single location by rats was manipulated in the various test settings to provide baseline probabilities of switching. d-Amphetamine (0.2–2.3 mg/kg) increased response switching. This effect did not depend on switching being necessary to produce reinforcement and was not explained by increases in locomotor activity, motivational change or randomisation of responding. Further evidence was provided in support of a ‘probability-dependency’ hypothesis, that the effect of the drug depends in part upon the baseline probability of a response. A measure of perseveration independent of response switching (extra responses made prior to the collection of food) showed that increased switching and increased perseveration occurred in the same situation at the same doses, although perseveration generally occurred at higher doses than increased switching. Therefore the effect of amphetamine on response switching or repetition depends on the dose of drug, the context of the response and its probability of occurrence under control conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Branch MN, Gollub LR (1974) A detailed analysis of the effects of d-amphetamine on behavior under fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 21: 519–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Dews PB, Wenger GR (1977) Rate-dependency of the behavioral effects of amphetamine. In: Thompson T, Dews PB (eds) Advances in behavioural pharmacology, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 167–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenden JL, Robbins TW (1983) Dissociable effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and α-flupenthixol on choice and rate measures of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 79: 180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RT (1970) Facilitation of conditioned reinforcement as a mechanism of psychomotor stimulation. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamine and related compounds. Raven, New York, pp 781–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Laties VG (1972) The modification of drug effects on behavior by external discriminative stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 183: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Laties VG, Wood RW, Cooper Rees D (1981) Stimulus control and the effects of d-amphetamine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 75: 277–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea SEG, Morgan MJ (1972) The measurement of rate-dependent changes in responding. In: Gilbert RM, Millenson JR (eds) Reinforcement: behavioural analysis. Academic, New York, pp 129–145

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan DE (1968) The effects of sympathomimetic amines on schedule-controlled behavior in the pigeon. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 160: 315–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerschbaecher JM, Thompson DM, Thomas JR (1979) Effects of methamphetamine and scopolamine on variability of response location. J Exp Anal Behav 32: 255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MJ (1974) Effects of random reinforcement sequences. J Exp Anal Behav 22: 301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton S (1973) Amphetamine as a model for hyperactivity in the rat. Physiol Behav 11: 181–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Randrup A, Munkvad I (1970) Biochemical, anatomical and psychological investigations of stereotyped behaviour induced by amphetamine. In: Costa E, Garattini S (eds) Amphetamine and related compounds, Raven, New York, pp 695–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW (1978) The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: Effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology 58: 79–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW (1980) Stereotypy of a learned response after apomorphine. Br J Pharmacol 69: 275–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW (1982) Behavioural determinants of drug action. In: Cooper SJ (ed) Theory in psychopharmacology, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins TW, Watson BA (1981) Effects of d-amphetamine on response repetition and win-stay behaviour in the rat. In: Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Lowe CF (eds) Quantification of steady-state operant behaviour. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 441–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal DS (1975) Behavioural characterisation of d- and l-amphetamine: Neurochemical implications. Science 190: 475–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon JER, Hanson JM, Kram R (1981) Optimal choice. J Exp Anal Behav 35: 397–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitelbaum P, Derks P (1958) The effect of amphetamine on forced drinking in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 51: 801–810

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorov JC, Gorayeb SRP, Correa DL, Graeff FG (1972) Effects of amphetamine on choice behavior of pigeons. Psychopharmacologia 26: 395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss B, Gott CT (1972) A microanalysis of drug effects on fixed-ratio performance in pigeons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 180: 189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw Hill-Kogakusha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evenden, J.L., Robbins, T.W. Increased response switching, perseveration and perseverative switching following d-amphetamine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 80, 67–73 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427498

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427498

Key words

Navigation