Skip to main content
Log in

The use of two measures of health-related quality of life in HIV-infected individuals: a cross-sectional comparison

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two measures of health-related quality of life in 65 HIV-infected individuals were compared in a cross-sectional design. The Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB) results in a single score ranging from death to perfect health. The MOS-HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV, 34-item version) gives scores in 11 dimensions. The QWB score distinguished subjects with AIDS from those who were asymptomatic (p=0.027). For the seven multi-item scales of the MOS-HIV, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.85–0.95, indicating good internal consistency reliability. Clinical HIV-infection status was significantly associated with the dimensions of Overall Health (p=0.002), Role Function (p=0.022), Social Function (p=0.037), Energy/Fatigue (p=0.027) and Health Distress (p=0.025). All eleven dimensions of the MOS-HIV were significantly correlated with the QWB score (Spearman's coefficient = 0.405–0.670; for all, p<0.01) and the QWB score could be predicted from the MOS-HIV dimension scores using multiple regression. The QWB and the MOS-HIV may be useful in assessing health-related quality of life in patients infected with HIV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pantaleo G, Graziosi C, Fauci AS. New concepts in the immunopathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton JD, Hartigan PM, Simberkoff MS, et al. A controlled trial of early versus late treatment with zidovudine in symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. Results of the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med 1992; 326: 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Concorde Coordinating Committee. Concorde: MRC/ANRS randomised double-blind controlled trial of immediate and deferred zidovudine in symptom-free HIV infection. Lancet 1994; 343: 871–881.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Melbye M, Biggar RJ, Ebbesen P, et al. Long-term seropositivity for human T-lymphocyte virus type III in homosexual men without the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: development of immunologic and clinical abnormalities. Ann Intern Med 1986; 104: 496–500.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fahey JL, Taylor JMG, Detels R, et al. The prognostic value of cellular and serologic markers in infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  6. deBoer JB, vanDam FSAM, Sprangers MAG, Frissen PHJ, Lange JMA. Longitudinal study on the quality of life of symptomatic HIV-infected patients in a trial of zidovudine versus zidovudine and interferon-α. AIDS 1993; 7: 947–953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gelber RD, Lenderking WR, Cotton DJ, et al. Quality-of-life evaluation in a clinical trial of zidovudine therapy in patients with mildly symptomatic HIV infection. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 961–966.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP, Wu AW, Mathews WC, Kozin F, Orenstein D. The Quality of Well-Being Scale: Applications in AIDS, cystic fibrosis, and arthritis. Med Care 1989; 27: S27-S43.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lenderking WR, Gelber RD, Cotton DJ, et al. Evaluation of the quality of life associated with zidovudine treatment in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 738–743.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lubeck DP, Bennett CL, Mazonson PD, Fifer S, Fries JF. Quality of life and health service use among HIV-infected patients with chronic diarrhea. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1993; 6: 478–484.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wachtel T, Piette J, Mor V, Stein M, Fleishman J, Carpenter C. Quality of life in persons with human immunodeficiency virus: measurement by the medical outcomes study instrument. Ann Int Med 1992; 116: 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wu AW, Rubin HR, Mathews WC, et al. A health status questionnaire using 30 items from the Medical Outcomes Study: Preliminary validation in persons with early HIV infection. Med Care 1991; 29: 786–798.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bozzette SA, Kanouse DE, Berry S, Duan N. Health status and function with zidovudine or zalcitabine as initial therapy for AIDS. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1995; 273: 295–301.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Burgess A, Dayer M, Catalan J, Hawkins D, Gazzard B. The reliability and validity of two HIV-specific health-related quality-of-life measures: a preliminary analysis. AIDS 1993; 7: 1001–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schag CA, Ganz PA, Kahn B, Petersen L. Assessing the needs and quality of life of patients with HIV infection: development of the HIV Overview of Problems—Evaluation System (HOPES). Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Services Res 1976.

  17. Kaplan RM, Atkins CJ, Timms R. Validity of a quality of well-being scale as an outcome measure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Chron Dis 1984; 2: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wu AW, Mathews WC, Brysk LT, et al. Quality of life in a placebo-controlled trial of zidovudine in patients with AIDS and AIDS-related complex. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1990; 3: 683–690.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JEJr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26: 724–735.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, ed. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1949: 199–205.

    Google Scholar 

  21. CDC. 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR 1992; 41 (No RR-17): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–335.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Soakl RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. San Francisco: WH Freeman and Company, 1981: 1–859.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McHorney CA, Ware JEJr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JFR. The validity and relative precision of MOS short-and long-form status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Med Care 1992; 30: MS253-MS265.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fryback DG, Dasbach ED, Klein R, et al. Health assessment by SF-36, Quality of Well-Being Index, and Time-Trade-offs: predicting one measure from another [abstract]. Med Decis Making 1992; 12: 348.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu AW, Lamping DL. Assessment of quality of life in HIV disease. AIDS 1994; 8(Suppl): S349-S359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Funding support for this study provided by the Center for Pharmaceutical Economics of the University of Arizona.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Copfer, A.E., Ampel, N.M., Hughes, T.E. et al. The use of two measures of health-related quality of life in HIV-infected individuals: a cross-sectional comparison. Qual Life Res 5, 281–286 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434750

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00434750

Key words

Navigation