Skip to main content
Log in

Intrasubstance meniscal tears

Clinical aspects and the role of MRI

  • Clinical and Experimental Forum
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Forty-five athletes with the clinical features of a possible meniscus lesion underwent evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All the patients examined had pain in the medial or lateral compartment on effort, but at least three of the typical symptoms of a meniscus tear (effusion, restricted movement, impactions, blockades, synovial reaction) were at the same time absent. A meniscus lesion was identified on MRI in 43 patients (95.5%). Thirty-five patients (77.7%) had a pure intrasubstance tear, with a predominance of the linear grade-II lesion type (n = 31; 68.8%). Exactly this type of lesion in the posterior horn represents the most frequent cause of false-negative results in other investigational procedures (arthrography, arthrotomy, arthroscopy). In ten cases conservative treatment was performed, 28 patients had a rationale or partial meniscectomy, and in 7 cases refixation of the meniscus was performed. Forty-two patients were free of symptoms at follow-up with this treatment. The advantages of MRI in the diagnosis of a meniscus lesion are: early detection of grade-I and grade-II lesions, visualization of all the extra-articular structures, no radiation loading, noninvasive investigation, definition of a surgical intervention, possibility of monitoring the clinical course, and postoperative follow-up. MRI is indicated when there is a suspected significant meniscus lesion but typical symptoms are absent, in children, and in all cases where conservative treatment seems possible. In only 10% of our patients was any of these indications present. During the period of the study (4 years) we performed 489 arthroscopic operations on menisci with no additional investigations. In summary, MRI can be very helpful for the classification and the surgical intervention, but the patients must be specifically selected and the interpretation needs a lot of experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnoczky SP (1985) Meniscus healing. Contemp Orthop 10:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnoczky SP, Warren RE (1982) Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med 10:90–95

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arnoczky SP, Warren RF, Spivak JM (1988) Meniscal repair using an exogenous fibrin clot: an experimental study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 70:1209–1217

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper DE, Arnoczky SP, Warren RF (1991) Meniscal repair. Clin Sports Med 10:529–548

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crues J, Mink J, Levy T, et al (1987) Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology 164:445–448

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dumas JM, Edde DJ (1986) Meniscal abnormalities: prospective correlation of double contrast arthrography and arthroscopy. Radiology 160:453

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gershuni DH, Skyhar MJ, Danzig LA, et al (1989) Experimental models to promote healing of tears in the avascular segment of canine knee menisci. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71:1363–1370

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gillies H, Seligson O (1979) Precision in the diagnosis of meniscal lesions. A comparison of clinical evaluation, arthrography and arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 61:343–346

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henning CE, Lynch MA, Yearout KM, et al (1990) Arthroscopic meniscal repair using an exogenous fibrin clot. Clin Orthop 252:64

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herman L, Beltran J (1988) Pitfalls in MR imaging of the knee. Radiology 167:775–781

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herzog RJ (1992) MRI Diagnostic techniques. ACL Study Group, Vail

  12. Ireland I, Trickey EL, Stoker DJ, et al (1980) Arthroscopy and arthrography of the knee: a critical review. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 62:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jerosch J, Lahm A, Castro WHM, et al (1991) Kernspin- und Computertomographie bei Meniscusverletzungen des Kniegelenkes. Unfallchirurg 94:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levinsohn EM (1980) Prearthrotomy diagnostic evaluation of the knee: review of 100 cases diagnosed by arthrography and arthroscopy. AJR 134:107–111

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lotysch M (1986) MR imaging in the detection of meniscal injuries. Magn Reson Imaging 4:185

    Google Scholar 

  16. McGlade CT (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging of the meniscus. Clin Sports Med 9:551–559

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mink F (1988) Tears of the anterior cruciate ligament and menisci of the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 167:769–774

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reicher MA, Hartzman S, Duckwiler GR, et al (1986) Detection using MR imaging. Radiology 159:753–757

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reinig JW, McDevitt ER, Ove PN (1991) Progression of meniscal degenerative changes in college football players: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 181:255–257

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stoller DW, Martin C, Crues JV, et al (1987) Meniscus tears: pathologic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology 163:731–735

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thijn C (1982) Accuracy of double-contrast arthrography and arthroscopy of the knee joint. Skeletal Radiol 8:187–192

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biedert, R.M. Intrasubstance meniscal tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 112, 142–147 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449992

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449992

Keywords

Navigation