Summary
A total of 28 patients with non-traumatic coma were studied both with somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials. While somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) have proved to be useful in predicting the outcome in patients with severe brain damage, the aim of this study was to find out whether the additional evaluation of motor-evoked potentials (MEP) could contribute to a better prediction of the outcome than SEP alone. Our results clearly indicate that in terms of prognostic value, SEP are superior to MEP. Nine patients with bilaterally preserved MEP died, while all of the patients with bilaterally preserved SEP and a central conduction time ≤ 6.5 ms survived, with a Glasgow outcome score of 1 to 3. Therefore, we cannot recommend the inclusion of MEP in the prognostic evaluation of patients with non-traumatic coma.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agnew AT, Mc Creery DB (1987) Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials. Neurosurg 20:143–147
Cant BR, Hume AL, Judson JA, et al (1986) Reassessment of severe head injury by short latency somatosensory and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. EEG Clin Neurophysiol 65:188–195
Greenberg RP, Becker DP, Miller JD, et al (1977) Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. Part 2. Localization of brain dysfunction and correlation with posttraumatic neurological conditions. J Neurosurg 47:163–177
Hume AL, Cant BR (1981) Central somatosensory conduction time after head trauma. Ann Neurol 10:411–419
Hume AL, Cant BR, Shaw NA (1979) Central somatosensory conduction time in comatose patients. Ann Neurol 5:379–384
Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet 1:480–484
Lindsay KW, Carlin J, Kennedy I, et al (1981) Evoked potentials in severe head injury — analysis and relation to outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 44:796–802
Merton PA, Morton HB (1980) Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature 285:227
Narayan RK, Greenberg RP, Miller JO, et al (1981) Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury: a comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials. CT scanning and intracranial-pressure. J Neurosurg 54:751–762
Obeso JA, Masso JFM, Teijeira J (1980) On the meaning of a monophasic positive somatosensory evoked potential in deep coma. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 20:343–349
Rumpl E (1985) Anwendung der SEP in der Intensivmedizin. Acta Neurol 12:53–57
Rumpl E, Prugger M, Gerstenbrand F, et al (1983) Central somatosensory conduction time and short latency evoked potentials in posttraumatic coma. Elektroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 56:583–596
Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet II:81–84
Walser H, Mattle H, Keller MH, et al (1985) Early cortical median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: prognostic value in anoxic coma. Arch Neurol 42:32–38
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zentner, J., Ebner, A. Prognostic value of somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials in patients with a non-traumatic coma. Eur Arch Psychiatr Neurol Sci 237, 184–187 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451288
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451288