Skip to main content
Log in

Use of perceived effort ratings to control exercise intensity in young healthy adults

  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) as a means of regulating the intensity of exercise during running. The subjects were healthy, relatively fit young adults (16 men and 12 women). Estimates of effort were recorded using the Borg 6–20 Scale whilst the maximal oxygen uptake of the subjects was measured as they ran on an electrically driven treadmill. In a further session, the same subjects were requested to run on the treadmill at constant exercise intensity based on their interpretation of levels 9, 13 and 17 of the Borg Scale. They regulated their running speed and the treadmill gradient but had no knowledge of performance from the equipment display panel. A linear regression analysis was carried out to examine the relationship between heart rate, perceived exertion and relative metabolic demand. This revealed that the rating of perceived exertion was at least as good a predictor of exercise intensity as heart rate in both the graded exercise test and effort production test. The results support the view that RPE may be used to predict relative metabolic demand, especially at higher workloads and could be a useful medium for controlling intensity of effort during vigorous exercise in such subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American College of Sports Medicine (1986) Guidelines for graded exercise testing and prescription. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg GAV (1977) Physical Work and Effort. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg GAV, Linderholm H (1970) Exercise performance and perceived exertion in patients with coronary insufficiency, arterial hypertension and vasoregulatory asthesia. Acta Med Scand 187:7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton RL, Rhodes EC (1985) A critical review of the literature on ratings scales for perceived exertion. Sports Med 2:198–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan WP (1981) Psychophysiology of self-awareness during vigorous physical activity. Res Quart Exerc Sport 52:385–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble BJ (1982) Clinical applications of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:406–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble BJ, Maresh CM, Ritchey M (1981) Comparison of exercise sensations between females and males. In: Borms J, Hebbelinck M, Venerando A (eds) Women and sport. S Karger, Basel, pp 175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandolf KB (1983) Advances in the study and application of perceived exertion. In: Terjung R (ed) Exercise and sports science reviews. 11 Academic Press, New York, pp 118–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis JW, Cureton KWJ (1981) Ratings of perceived exertion at the anaerobic threshold. Ergonomics 24:295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Smutok MA, Skrinar GS, Pandolf KB (1980) Subjective regulation by perceived exertion. Arch Physic Med Rehab 61:569–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoden JS, Wilson BA, MacDougall JD (1985) Testing aerobic power. In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (eds) Physiological testing of the elite athlete. Canadian Association of Sports Sciences, Winsor Ontario, pp 39–60

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eston, R.G., Davies, B.L. & Williams, J.G. Use of perceived effort ratings to control exercise intensity in young healthy adults. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 56, 222–224 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00640648

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00640648

Key words

Navigation