Skip to main content
Log in

A correlative study of ultrasound calcaneal and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements of the lumbar spine and femur in 1000 women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objectives of the study were firstly to determine the accuracy of ultrasound calcaneal measurements in the prediction of bone mineral density determinations with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and Ward's triangle (FW) in a mixed population of 1000 women, unsorted as to diagnosis, and secondly to determine the accuracy of the various site-specific measurements in predicting each other. Ultrasound measurements [stiffness, speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA)] were made with the Lunar Achilles device, and the bone mineral density (BMD) of the LS, FN and FW were determined with the Lunar DPX. The data were analyzed for correlation, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of various paired sites. The coefficients of correlation of the young adultt-scores in the total group between calcaneal stiffness and BMDs of the LS, FN, and FW varied between 0.53 and 0.60. Coefficients for LS versus IN and FW were 0.70 and 0.62, respectively. A comparison of SOS and BUA values obtained at the calcaneus with BMDs of the LS, FN and FW yielded correlation coefficients that varied from 0.54 to 0.56. The general accuracy of prediction of one site by another ranged from 64.2% to 74.4%, where normality was defined as at-score >−2. It is concluded that no site can predict the status of another site with sufficiently high accuracy to be clinically useful. The role of ultrasound transmission in bone as a predictor of fracture risk is theoretically promising, but has yet to be proved by a long term prospective study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gluer CC, Wu CY, Jergus M, Goldstein A, Genant HK. Three quantitative parameters reflect bone structures.Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 55: 46–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Langton CM, Evans GP, Hodgkinson R, Riggs CM. Ultarsonic, elastic and structural properties of cancellous bone. London: British Institute of Radiology, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg D, Bonnin-Fayet P, Bergot C, Laval-Jeantet M. Comparison by different technics of calcaneum bone mass measurements in Caucasian women [abstract].Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Osteoporosis, Gardiner-Caldwell Communications Ltd., Hong Kong. 1993: 65.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mautalen C, Gonzales D, Circosta A. Ultrasonic assessment of bone in normal and osteoporotic women [abstract].Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Osteoporosis, Gardiner-Caldwell Communications Ltd., Hong Kong. 1993: 43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Young H, Howey S, Purdie DW. Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening postmenopausal low bone density.Osteoporosis Int 1993; 3: 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lees B, Stevenson JC. Evaluation of a new ultrasound densitometer.Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Osteoporosis, Gardiner-Caldwell Communications Ltd., Hong Kong. 1993: 53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Faulkner KG, McClung MR, Coleman LJ, Kingston-Sandahl E. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel: correlation with densitometric measurements at different skeletal sites.Osteoporosis Int 1994; 4: 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schott AM, Hans D, Sornay-Rendu E, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ. Ultrasound measurements on os calcis: precision and agerelated changes in a normal female population.Osteoporosis Int 1993; 3: 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner WS. Appendicular bone density and age predict fracture in women.JAMA 1990; 263: 665–668.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandenberger GH. Clinical determination of bone quality: Is ultrasound the answer?Calcif Tissue Int 1993; 53 (Suppl 1): S151-S156.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kimmel DB, Heany RP, Avioli LU, et al. Patellar ultrasound velocity in osteoporotic and normal subjects of equal forearm and spinal bone density [abstract].J Bone Miner Res 1991; 6 (Suppl 1): S366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenthall, L., Tenenhouse, A. & Caminis, J. A correlative study of ultrasound calcaneal and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements of the lumbar spine and femur in 1000 women. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 402–406 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00839053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00839053

Key words

Navigation