Skip to main content
Log in

A daily stress inventory: Development, reliability, and validity

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describes the development of the Daily Stress Inventory, a measure introduced to provide researchers and clinicians with a psychometrically sound self-report instrument for the daily assessment of the sources and individualized impact of relatively minor stressful events. It was designed to assess sources of stress not typically assessed by major life-event scales. Generalizability coefficients indicate that the scale has significant homogeneity and a useful degree of stability. Several studies investigating the concurrent and construct validities suggest that the scale measures the construct commonly referred to as “stress”. Implications for uses in theoretical and basic research as well as clinical assessment are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatrie Association (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd ed., American Psychiatrie Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1976).Psychological Testing, 4th ed., Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, C. (1980). Sex differences in reporting and rating of life events: A comparison of diabetic and healthy subjects.J. Psychosom. Res. 24: 35–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. W. (1981). Life events, psychiatric disorder and physical illness.J. Psychosom. Res. 25: 461–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychol. Bull. 56: 81–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, P. J. (1980). A checklist for life events research.J. Psychosom. Res. 24: 199–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Delongis, A., Coyne, J. C., Dakof, G., Folkman, S., and Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Relationship of daily hassles, uplifts, and major life events to health status.Health Psychol. 1(2): 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenwend, B. S., and Dohrenwend, B. P. (1978). Some issues in research on stressful life events.J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 106: 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenwend, B. P., and Shrout, P. E. (1985). “Hassles” in the conceptualization and measurement of life stress variables.Am. Psychol. 40: 780–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S. (1975). A person-situation interaction model of anxiety. In Spielberger, C. D., and Sarason, I. G. (eds.),Stress and Anxiety, Vol. 1, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S. (1980). Person-situation interaction and anxiety. In Kutash, I. L., and Schlesinger, L. B. (eds.),Handbook on Stress and Anxiety: Contemporary Knowledge, Theory, and Treatment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., and Edwards, J. (1982). Stress and personality. In Goldberg, L., and Breznitz, S. (eds.),Handbook of Stress, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, N. C., Davies, R., and Holmes, T. H. (1957). Evidence of psychosocial factors in the development of pulmonary tuberculosis.Am. Rev. Tuberc. Pulmon. Disord. 75: 768–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. H., and Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale.J. Psychosom. Res. 11: 213–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M., Schaefer, C., Hiroto, D., Wilmer, N., and Levin, B. (1977). Life events questionnaires for measuring presumptive stress.Psychosom. Med. 39(6): 413–431.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., and Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events.J. Behav. Med. 4: 1–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1984). Puzzles in the study of daily hassles.J. Behav. Med. 7: 375–389.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., and Gruen, R. (1985). Stress and adaptational outcomes: The problem of confounded measures.Am. Psychol. 40: 770–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, H., and Skinner, H. S. (1980). A psychometric study of life events and social readjustment.J. Psychosom. Res. 24: 57–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1977).The Meaning of Anxiety, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearlin, L. I. (1982). The social contexts of stress. In Goldberger, L., and Brenznitz, S. (eds.),Handbook of Stress, Free Press, New York, pp. 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. V. (1982). The assessment of stress using life events scales. In Goldberger, L., and Brenznitz, S. (eds.),Handbook of Stress, Free Press, New York, pp. 320–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin, J. G., and Struening, E. L. (1976). Life events, stress and illness.Science 194: 1013–1020.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J. M. (1982).Assessment of Children's Intelligence and Special Abilities, 2nd ed., Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1979).Understanding Stress and Anxiety, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., and Lushene, R. E. (1970).Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., and Lubin, B. (1965).Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List, Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We gratefully acknowledge Frank M. Gresham for his statistical consultation and editorial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brantley, P.J., Waggoner, C.D., Jones, G.N. et al. A daily stress inventory: Development, reliability, and validity. J Behav Med 10, 61–73 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845128

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845128

Key words

Navigation