Abstract
Teachers use both positive and negative consequences to influence classroom behaviors. Four experiments were conducted to examine the differential affects of these two types of consequences on the maintenance of appropriate behaviors of hyperactive children. Results of Experiment 1 showed that the use of both positive and negative consequences (combined) was associated with high levels of on-task behaviors. Withdrawal of negative consequences caused a significant and dramatic decrease in on-task performance. The withdrawal of positive consequences produced no change in the rate of on-task behaviors. In Experiments 2, 3, and 4, the on-task results of Experiment 1 were replicated using a different teacher, different children, a counterbalanced design, longer phases, and different types of negative consequences. The withdrawal of negative consequences led to decreases in productivity in Experiment 2. The results of Experiment 3 also suggested that a prudent (e.g., calm, concrete, and consistent) approach to discipline was more effective than an imprudent (e.g., loud, emotional, and inconsistent) approach. Some level of mild negative consequences for inappropriate behavior is an important ingredient in effective classroom management, and qualitatively different negative consequences may have drastically different effects on the behavior of hyperactive students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, W. C., Madsen, C. H., Jr., Arnold, C. R., & Thomas, D. R. (1967). The contingent use of teacher attention and praise in reducing classroom behavior problems.Journal of Special Education, 1, 287–307.
Brackbill, Y., & O'Hara, J. (1958). Relative effectiveness of reward and punishment for discrimination learning in children.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 747–751.
Conners, C. K. (1969). A teacher rating scale for use in drug studies with children.American Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 884–888.
Firestone, P., & Douglas, V. (1975). The effects of reward and punishment on reaction times and autonomic activity in hyperactive and normal children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3, 201–216.
Hall, R. V., Fox, R., Willard, D., Goldsmith, L., Emerson, M., Owen, M., Davis, G., & Porcia, E. (1971). The teachers as observer and experimenter in the modification of disrupting and talking-out behaviors.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 141–149.
Hall, R. V., Lund, D., & Jackson, D. (1968). Effects of teacher attention on study behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 1–12.
Hart, B. M., Reynolds, N. J., Baer, D. M., Brawley, E. R., & Harris, F. R. (1968). Effective use of contingent and noncontingent social reinforcement on the cooperative play of a preschool child.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 73–76.
Jones, F. H., & Miller, W. H. (1974). The effective use of negative attention for reducing group disruption in special elementary school classrooms.Psychological Record, 24, 435–448.
Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (1981).Responsible classroom disciplines. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
MacMillan, D., Forness, S. R., & Trumbull, B. M. (1973). The role of punishment in the classroom.Exceptional Children 40, 85–96.
Madsen, C. H., Becker, W. C., & Thomas, D. R. (1968). Rules, praise and ignoring: Elements of elementary classroom control.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 139–150.
Madsen, C. H., Jr., Becker, W. C., Thomas, D. R., Koser, L., & Plager, E. (1968). An analysis of the reinforcing function of “sit down” commands. In R. K. Parker (Ed.),Readings in educational psychology (pp. 265–278). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Madsen, C. H., Madsen, C. K., Saudargas, R. A., Hammond, W. R., & Egar, D. E. (1970). Classroom RAID (rules, approval, ignore, disapproval): a cooperative approach for professionals and volunteers.Journal of School Psychology.8, 180–185.
O'Leary, K. D., Becker, W. C., Evans, M. B., & Saundargas, R. A. (1969). A token reinforcement program in a public school: A replication and systematic analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 3–13.
O'Leary, K. D., Kaufman, K. F., Kass, R. E., & Drabman, R. S. (1970). The effects of loud and soft reprimands on the behavior of disruptive students.Exceptional Children, 37, 145–155.
O' Leary, K. D., & O' Leary, S. G. (1977).Classroom management: The successful use of behavior modification (2nd ed.) New York: Pergamon Press.
Parry, P. A., & Douglas, V. I. (1983). Effects of reinforcement on concept identification in hyperactive children.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 11, 327–340.
Ratliff, R. G. (1972). Two-choice discrimination learning in children as a function of punishment modality and reinforcement combination.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 14, 365–371.
Ratliff, R. G., & Root, J. R. (1974). Two-choice discrimination learning in children as a joint function of incentive level and punishment.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 124, 249–257.
Redd, W. H., Morris, E. K., & Martin, J. A. (1975). Effects of positive and negative adult-child interactions on children's social preferences.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19, 153–164.
Sajwaj, T., Twardosz, S., & Burke, M. (1972). Side effects of extinction procedures in a remedial preschool.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 163–175.
Stevenson, J., Weir, M., Zigler, E. F. (1959). Discrimination learning in children as a function of motive-incentive condition.Psychological Reports, 5, 95–98.
Strain, P. S., Lambert, D. L., Kerr, M. M., Stagg, V., & Lenker, D. A. (1983). Naturalistic assessment of children's compliance to teachers' requests and consequences for compliance.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 243–249.
Thomas, D. R., Becker, W. C., & Armstrong, M. (1968). Production and elimination of disruptive classroom behavior by systematically varying teacher's behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1, 34–45.
Thomas, J. D., Presland, I. E., Grant, M. D., & Glynn, T. L. (1978). Natural rates of teacher approval and disapproval in grade-7 classrooms.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 91–94.
van Houten, R., Nau, P. A., Mackenzie-Keating, S. E., Sameoto, D., & Colavecchi, B. (1982). An analysis of some variables influencing the effectiveness of reprimands.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 65–83.
White, M. A. (1975). Natural rates of teacher approval and disapproval in the classroom.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 367–372.
Willner, A. G., Braukmann, C. T., Kirigin, K. A., Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E., & Wolf, M. M. (1977). The training and validation of youth-preferred social behaviors of child-care personnel.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 219–230.
Witte, K., & Grossman, E. (1971). The effects of reward and punishment upon children's affection, motivation, and discrimination learning.Child Development, 42, 537–542.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Middle Country Central School District No. 11, Centereach, New York, to the second author. We are grateful for the district's continued support. In addition, the authors wish to thank K. Daniel O' Leary for his helpful editorial comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rosén, L.A., O'Leary, S.G., Joyce, S.A. et al. The importance of prudent negative consequences for maintaining the appropriate behavior of hyperactive students. J Abnorm Child Psychol 12, 581–604 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916852
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916852