Skip to main content
Log in

Development of the severity of violence against women scales

  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In response to the need for more sensitive assessment instruments, scales were developed applicable to the evaluation of male violence against women. Two versions of the Severity of Violence Against Women Scale (SVAWS) were developed. On 10-point scales, college females (N = 707) rated how serious, aggressive, abusive, violent, and threatening it would be if a man carried out each of 46 acts with a woman. The mean of each act across ratings was calculated and submitted to factor analysis. Nine factors represented symbolic violence: threats of mild, moderate, and serious violence; actual mild, minor, moderate, and serious violence; and sexual violence. Community women (N = 208) rated the acts on seriousness, aggressiveness, and abusiveness. All factors were unidimensional. Second-order factor analysis confirmed the existence of two broader dimensions representing physically threatening acts and actual violence. Ratings of the amount of physical and emotional harm provided the weightings for future research with student (SVAWS-S) and adult (SVAWS) samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arias, L, and Johnson, P. J. (1986).Evaluations of Physical Aggression in Marriage, Paper presented at the 20th Annual Convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Chicago, IL.

  • Arias, I., and Johnson, P. J. (1989). Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads.J. Interpers. Viol. 4: 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barling, J., O'Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, P., and MacEwen, K. E. (1987). Factor similarity of the conflict tactics scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Issues and implications.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, P., Hotaling, G. T., and Yllo, K. (1988).Stopping Family Violence, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W. (1987). Evaluating programs for men who batter: Problems and prospects.J. Fam. Viol. 2: 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1988). Skills training for treatment of spouse abusers: An outcome study.J Fam. Viol. 3: 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. W., and McIntosh, S. R. (1981). The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions.J. Marr. Fam. 43: 873–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koski, P. R., and Mangold, W. D. (1988). Gender effects in attitudes about family violence.J. Fam. Viol. 3: 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1986). Gender differences in courtship violence victimization.Fam. Relat. 35: 383–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, L. L. (in press). The severity of violence against men scales.J. Fam. Viol.

  • Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (1989). The help-seeking behavior of physically and sexually abused college students. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.J. Marr. Fam. 41: 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. C., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. K. (1980).Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family, Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D. B., and Hotaling, G. T. (1989). Dating violence: prevalence, context, and risk markers. In Pirog-Good, M. A., and Stets, J. E. (eds.),Violence in Dating Relationship: Emerging Social Issues, Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners.Viol. Vict. 4: 159–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, J. G. (1989). Family violence research methodology and design. In Ohlin, L., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Family Violence, University of Chicago Press.

  • Windle, M. (1988). Psychometric strategies of measures of temperament: A methodological critique.Int. J. Behav. Devel. 11: 171–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yllo, K. (1989). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. In Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (eds.),Feminist Perspectives on Wife Abuse, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, L.L. Development of the severity of violence against women scales. J Fam Viol 7, 103–121 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00978700

Key words

Navigation