Skip to main content
Log in

Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach

  • Clinical Applications
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The return to work process of an injured worker is dependent upon matching the physical abilities of the worker with physical demands of work tasks. Functional work movements and tasks are complex. Machines, equipment and isolated musculoskeletal testing have not produced data that is broad enough to project multi-faceted work ability. Functional capacity evaluations, which are sets of dynamic work tests, have seen a growing acceptance because of their whole-worker approach. The basic items of functional evaluations (lifting, carrying, bending, reaching, climbing) are compiled into a comprehensive test which results in information about the whole of work and overall ability of the worker. Projections into an eight-hour day and comparison to physical demands of the job are included in outcome of a functional capacity evaluation. The Kinesiophysical design approach also produces information on safety, compliance, movement characteristics and physical reasons behind work limitations. Utility of functional evaluation is exemplified when employers, and physicians use it as a basis for safe work return of the employee.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Ergonomics Program Management Guidelines for Meatpacking Plants, 1990.

  2. EEOC: American's with Disabilities Act: Technical Assistance Manual. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, D.C., 1992.

  3. EEOC: American's with Disabilities Act: Handbook. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, Washington, D.C., 1992.

  4. Pizatella R, et al. The NIOSH strategy of reducign musculoskeletal injuries in work injury: Management and prevention, Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications, 1988, pp. 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Isernhagen S. Isolated testing, functional capacity evaluation and work tolerance testing. Industrial Rehabilitation Quarterly. Irvine, California: Roy Matheson & Associates, Spring 1991, pp. 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miller M. Functional assessments.Work 1991; 1: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Isernhagen S. The role of functional capacity assessment after rehabilitation. In Bullock M, ed.Ergonomics—The physiotherapist in the workplace. London: Churchill-Livingstone, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Key G. Work capacity analysis. In Scully M, Barnes M, eds.Physical therapy. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lippincott Co., 1989, pp. 652–667.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayer T, et al. Objective assessment of spine functional following industrial injury: A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up.Spine 1985, 10: 482–493.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Waddell G, McCulloch J, Jummel E, et al. Nonorganic physical signs in low back pain.Spine 1980; 5: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waddell G, Main C, Morris E, et al. Chronic low back pain, psychologic distress, and illness behavior.Spine 1984; 9: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isernhagen S. Functional capacity evaluation. In Isernhagen S, ed.Work Injury: Management and prevention. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, 1988, pp. 139–192.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shultz-Johnson K. Evaluating the Workers Functional Capacities for Repetitive Work. Seminars in Occupation Medicine-Repetitive Motion Disorders, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1987, pp. 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodgers S. Job evaluation in worker fitness determination. In Himmelstein J, Pransky B, eds.Worker fitness and risk evaluation. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Hanley & Belfus, 1988, pp. 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bullock M. The development of optimum worker-task relationships. In Bullock M, ed.Ergonomics: The physiotherapist in the workplace. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1990, pp. 13–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isernhagen, S.J. Functional capacity evaluation: Rationale, procedure, utility of the kinesiophysical approach. J Occup Rehab 2, 157–168 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077187

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01077187

Key Words

Navigation