Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised: Psychometric characteristics and clinical application

  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The psychometric characteristics of the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised (WMS-R) are evaluated and related to dits clinical utility. The accuracy of the scale scores is shown to be limited by their high standard error, low reliabilities, and consequent large standard errors of measurement. Specific procedures are discussed for establishing confidence intervals and for testing the significance of differences between scores. It is concluded that the WMS-R, like the original Wechsler Memory Scale, provides only a rough estimate of overall memory functioning. The multidimensional index scores have not been shown effective in describing the nature or the pattern of memory deficits. Recommendations for the clinical use of the WMS-R are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1987).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., rev.), Author, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1981). Ethical principles of psychologists.American Psychologist 36: 633–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi, A. (1988).Psychological Testing (6th ed.), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, L. (1991). Three standard errors of measurement and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 3: 136–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldessarini, R. J., Finklestein, S., and Arana, G. W. (1983). The predictive power of diagnostic tests and the effect of prevalence of illness.Archives of General Psychiatry 40: 569–573.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. A., and Chelune, G. J. (1988). Factor structure of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2: 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. A., Chelune, G. J., and Prifitera, A. (1989). IQ-memory discrepancies in normal and clinical samples.Psychological Assessment 1: 203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butters, N., Salmon, D. P., Cullum, C. M., Cairns, P., Tröster, A. I., Jacobs, D., Moss, M. and Cermak, L. S. (1988). Differentiation of amnesic and demented patients with the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2: 133–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelune, G. J., and Bornstein, R. A. (1988). WMS-R patterns among patients with unilateral brain lesions.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2: 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1988). The eigenvalues-greater-than-one rule and reliability of components.Psychological Bulletin 103: 276–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods.Multivariate Behavior Research 56: 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1970).Essentials of Psychological Testing, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. R. (1986). Psychometric perspectives: Validity and reliability. In Poon, L. W. (ed.),Clinical Memory Assessment in Older Adults, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Elia, L., Satz, P., and Schretlen, D. (1989). Wechsler Memory Scale: A critical appraisal of the normative studies.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 11: 551–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dudek, F. J. (1979). The continuing misinterpretation of the standard error of measurement.Psychological Bulletin 86: 335–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, R. W. (1991). Delayed recall on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R): The factor structure revisited. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Elwood, R. W. (in press). Factor structure of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) in a clinical sample: A methodological reappraisal.The Clinical Neuropsychologist.

  • Erickson, R. C., and Howieson, D. (1986). The clinician's perspective: Measuring change and treatment effectiveness. In Poon, L. W. (ed.),Clinical Memory Assessment in Older Adults American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 69–80.

  • Fisher, J. S. (1988). Using the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised to detect and characterize memory deficits in multiple sclerosis.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2: 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, M. D. (1989).Reliability and Validity in Neuropsychological Assessment, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutting, J. J., McDermott, P. A., and Stanley, J. C. (1987). Resolving differences among methods of establishing confidence limits for test scores.Educational and Psychological Measurement 47: 607–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Sawicki, R. F., and Franzen, M. D. (1984). Test construction. In Goldstein, G., and Hersen, M. (eds.),Handbook of Psychological Assessment, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch, R. L. (1983).Factor Analysis (2d ed.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs, R. W. (1990). Current and emergent applications of neuropsychological assessment: Problems of validity and utility.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 3: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, R. M. (1984).Sampling in Education and the Social Sciences, Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S. (1990).Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence, Allyn and Bacon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, R. R. (1983). On interpreting the several standard errors of the WAIS-R: Some further tables.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51: 671–673.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M. (1983).Neuropsychological Assessment (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. R. (1968).Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring, D. A. (1989). The Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, or the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revisited?The Clinical Neuropsychologist 3: 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loring, D. W., Lee, G. P., Martin, R. C., and Meador, K. J. (1989). Verbal and visual memory index discrepancies from the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised: Cautions in interpretation.Psychological Assessment 1: 198–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D. (1990). Psychological assessment versus psychological testing.American Psychologist 45: 999–1017.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D., and Herman, D. O. (1984). Base rate data for the WAIS-R: Test-retest stability and VIQ-PIQ differences.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 6: 351–366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores.Psychological Bulletin 52: 194–216.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Burton, D. B., Thompson, G. B., and Darrow, E. (1991, February) Normative data for the WMS-R: 25- to 34-year-olds. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, San Antonio, TX.

  • Mortensen, R. L., Gade, A., and Reinisch, J. M. (1991). A critical note on Lezak's ‘best performance method’ in clinical neuropsychology.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 13: 361–371.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J. A. (1982). Two types of tables for use with the WAIS-R.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 50: 319–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1967).Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powel, J. (1988). Review of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 3: 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G. P. (1977). The Wechsler Memory Scale is a poor screening test for brain dysfunction.Journal of Clinical Psychology 33: 772–777.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prigatano, G. P. (1978). Wechsler Memory Scale: A selective review of the literature.Journal of Clinical Psychology 34: 816–832.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, D. B., and Kelly, M. P. (1991). A study of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised in closed-head injury. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, San Antonio, TX.

  • Reynolds, C. R., Wilson, V. L., and Clark, P. L. (1983). A four-test short form of the WAIS-R for clinical screening.Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 5: 111–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roid, G. H., Prifitera, A., and Ledbetter, M. (1988). Confirmatory analysis of the factor structure of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2: 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1990, March/April). Misleading reliability.The Sciences pp. 6–8.

  • Roth, D. L., Conboy, T. J., Reeder, K. P., and Boll, T. J. (1990). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised in a sample of head-injured patients.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 12: 834–842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, E. W. (1975). A multiple scoring method for the assessment of complex memory functions.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43: 800–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. J., and Lewis, C. V. (1988). Comparison of normal controls and recently detoxified alcoholics on the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised.The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2: 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, A. B. (1982). Two- and four-subtest short forms of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 50: 415–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, A. B. (1989). Confidence intervals for test scores and significance tests for test score differences: A comparison of methods.Journal of Clinical Psychology 45: 828–832.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. (1980).Statistical Methods (7th ed.), Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreen, O., and Strauss, E. (1991).A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1971). Reliability. In R. L. Thorndike, R. L. (ed.),Educational Measurement (2nd ed.), American Council on Education, Washington, DC, pp. 356–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981).Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, The Psychological Corporation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1987).Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised, The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, R., and Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of factors.Psychological Bulletin 99: 432–442.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology Service (116B), Veterans Administration Medical Center, 54660, Tomah, Wisconsin

    Richard W. Elwood

Authors
  1. Richard W. Elwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elwood, R.W. The Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised: Psychometric characteristics and clinical application. Neuropsychol Rev 2, 179–201 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01109053

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01109053

Key words

Search

Navigation