Summary
Using multichannel measurements of EEG and/or MEG, macroscopic source activities can be estimated in the human brain using brain electric source analysis (BESA, Scherg 1990). If a discrete number of brain areas is active, functional brain images which depict the locations and orientations of equivalent dipole sources as well as the dynamics of the local macroscopic currents can be obtained from such data - in principle -without external knowledge. However, given a certain number of sources or ‘neural masses’ (Freeman 1975) which contribute to an event related response (ERP), it can be difficult to find the correct solution due to background noise in the data and distortions from the head model. Prior knowledge based on anatomy and physiology can be useful to constrain spatial or temporal parameters of the model and to define better cost functions for fitting locations and orientations. An analysis of the auditory evoked N100 complex and of the auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) is presented which illustrates the use of spatial constraints. Also, the use of a modified cost function is demonstrated which limits source currents in certain time intervals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achim, A., Richer, R. and Saint-Hilaire, J.M. Methods for separating temporally overlapping sources of neuroelectric data. Brain Topography, 1988, 1: 22–28.
Baumgartner, C., Barth, D.S. and Sutherling, W.W. Spatiotemporal modeling of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields. In: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink, M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, 1989: 161–164.
De Munck, J.C. The estimation of time varying dipoles on the basis of evoked potentials. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1990, 77: 156–60.
De Munck, J.C., van Dijk, B.W. and Spekreijse, H. Mathematical dipoles are adequate to describe realistic generators of human brain activity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1988, 35: 960–966.
Freeman, W.J. Mass action in the nervous system. New York, Academic Press, 1975.
Freeman, W.J. Use of spatial deconvolution to compensate for distortion of EEG by volume conduction. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1980, 27: 421–429.
Haneishi, H., Ohyama, N. and Sekihara, K. Discussion of biomagnetic imaging system and reconstruction algorithm. In: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink, M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, 1989: 575–578.
Ioannides, A.A., Bolton, J.P.R. and Clarke, C.J.S. Continuous probabilistic solutions to the biomagnetic inverse problem. Inverse Problems, 1990, 6: 523–542.
Maier, J., Dagnelie, H., Spekreijse, H. and van Dijk, B.W. Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man. Vision Res. 1987, 27: 165–177.
Okamoto, Y., Teramachi, Y. and Musha, T. Limitation of the inverse problem in body surface potential mapping. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 1983, 30: 749–754.
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., Giard, M.H. and Echallier, J.F. Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolations. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 66: 75–81.
Scherg, M. Spatio-temporal modelling of early auditory evoked potentials. Rev. Laryngol. (Bordeaux) 1984, 105: 163–170.
Scherg, M. Fundamentals of dipole source potential analysis. In: F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Romani (Eds.), Auditory evoked magnetic fields and potentials. Adv. Audiol., Vol. 6, Basel, Karger, 1990: 40–69.
Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985a, 62: 32–44.
Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I-V: Results of a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985b, 62: 290–299.
Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 65: 344–60.
Scherg, M. and Buchner, H. Somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetic fields: Separation of multiple source activities. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. Suppl., 1991, in press.
Scherg, M. and Picton, T.W. Separation and identification of event- related potential components by brain electric source analysis. In: C.H.M. Brunia (Ed.), Event-Related Potentials of the brain (EEG Suppl. 42). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991: in press.
Scherg, M., Vajsar, J. and Picton, T.W. A source analysis of the human auditory evoked potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1989a, 1: 336–355.
Scherg, M., Hari, R. and Hämäläinen, M. Frequency-specific sources of the auditory N19-P30-P50 response detected by a multiple source analysis of evoked magnetic fields and potentials. In: S.J. Williamson, M. Hoke, G. Stroink, M. Kotani (Eds.), Advances in Biomagnetism. Plenum Press, New York, 1989b: 97–100.
Vaughan, H.G., Jr. The analysis of scalp-recorded brain potentials. In: R.F. Thompson and M.M. Patterson (Eds.), Bioelectric recording techniques, part B. Academic Press, New York, 1974, 158–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scherg, M., Berg, P. Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis. Brain Topogr 4, 143–150 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132771
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132771