Abstract
Factor analyses were used to develop new scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List (MAACL) measuring anxiety, depression, hostility, positive, and sensation-seeking affects. Anxiety, depression, and hostility scales were moderately intercorrelated and a combined score called “dysphoria” was formed from their addition. Positive and sensation-seeking affects were also correlated and combined in a summary score (PASS). The dysphoric and PASS scores were not highly correlated. The number of items checked correlated highly with the positive affect scale, moderately with sensation seeking, and relatively low with the negative affect scales. Internal reliabilities were high and retest reliabilities were low, in conformance with the model for state scales. The anxiety score increased and the positive affect score and number of items checked decreased just prior to a classroom examination. Further plans for scale development are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gough, H. G., and Heilbrun, A. B.The Adjective Check List Manual. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1965.
Hase, H. D., and Goldberg, L. R. The comparative validity of different strategies of deriving personality inventory scales.Psychological Bulletin 1967,67 231–248.
Lubin, B., and Zuckerman, M. Bibliography for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List, Unpublished, August 1982.
Neary, R. S.The development and validation of a state measure of sensation seeking, unpublished doctoral dissertation. Newark: University of Delaware, June 1965.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., and Lushene, R. E.STAI Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.
Zuckerman, M. The development of an Affect Adjective Check List for the measurement of anxiety.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1960,24 457–462.
Zuckerman, M. Response set in a check list test: A sometimes thing.Psychological Reports 1969,25, 773–774.
Zuckerman, M. General and situation specific traits and states: New approaches to assessment of anxiety and other constructs. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.),Emotions and anxiety: New concepts, methods, and applications. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1976.
Zuckerman, M. Development of a situation-specific trait-state test for the prediction and measurement of affective responses.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1977,45, 513–523.
Zuckerman, M.Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1979.
Zuckerman, M. To risk or not to risk: Predicting behavior from negativeand positive emotional states. In K. R. Blanksteen, P. Pliner, and J. Polivy (Eds.),Advances in the study of communications and affect. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.
Zuckerman, M. The distinction between trait and state scales is not arbitrary: Comments on Allen and Pokay's “on the arbitrary distinction between traits and states.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1983,44 1083–1086.
Zuckerman, M., and Biase, D. V. Replication and further data on the Affect Adjective Check List measure of anxiety.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1962,26 291.
Zuckerman, M., and Lubin, B.Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. San Diego, Calif.: Educational and Industrial Testing Service, 1965.
Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B., Vogel, L., and Valerius, E. Measurement of experimentally induced affects.Journal of Consulting Psychology 1964,28 418–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B. & Rinck, C.M. Construction of new scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List. Journal of Behavioral Assessment 5, 119–129 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321444
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321444