Skip to main content
Log in

Penetrating craniocerebral shrapnel injuries during “Operation Desert Storm”: Early results of a conservative surgical treatment

  • Clinical Articles
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A follow-up study is presented of the initial neurosurgical treatment of 20 patients who sustained penetrating eraniocerebral injuries during “Operation Desert Storm”. Fifteen of these patients had received intracranial debridement through a craniectomy and five patients had received care of scalp wounds only. Following treatment and stabilisation in a frontline hospital, these patients were transferred to the Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital for further evaluation and management.

On admission, all the patients received a computerised tomographic scan which revealed shrapnel fragments inside their brain. No attempt had been made to remove the metal fragments. A patient with an infected scalp wound was treated with a course of appropriate antibiotics and the wound dressed. Dexamethasone was not used. Anticonvulsants were used only in one patient who had been treated for a presumed cerebral abscess.

The neurological status of the patients improved along with the reduction of oedema and the swelling of the brain as shown in the follow-up CT scans. No patient died or developed a seizure disorder.

These results suggest that re-operation for removal of retained fragments is unnecessary. It is concluded that the initial treatment of shrapnel wounds of the brain should be to preserve maximal cerebral tissue and function either by limiting the wound debridement performed through a craniectomy or by care of scalp wounds only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarabi B (1987) Comparative study of bacteriological contamination between primary and secondary exploration of missile head wounds. Neurosurgery 20: 610–616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aarabi B (1989) Causes of infections in penetrating head wounds in the Iran-Iraq war. Neurosurgery 25: 923–926

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aarabi B (1990) Surgical outcome in 435 patients who sustained missile head wounds during the Iran-Iraq war. Neurosurgery 27: 692–695

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ameen AA (1984) The management of acute craniocerebral injuries caused by missiles: analysis of 110 consecutive penetrating wounds of the brain from Basrah. Injury 16: 88–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arendall REH, Meirowsky AM (1983) Air sinus wounds: an analysis of 163 consecutive cases incurred in the Korean War 1950–52. Neurosurgery 13: 377–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakay L (1984) The value of CT scan in gunshot injuries to the brain. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 71: 189–204

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barnett JC, Meirowsky AM (1955) Intracranial hematomas associated with penetrating wounds of the brain. J Neurosurg 12: 34–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bashir EM, Choudhury AR, Cybulski GR, Al Moutaery KR (1992) Management of penetrating cranio-cerebral gunshot injuries in civilians. Saudi Medical Journal 13: 170–171

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brandvold B, Levi L, Feinrod M, George ED (1990) Penetrating craniocerebral injuries in the Israeli involvement in the Lebanese conflict, 1982–1985: analysis of a less aggressive surgical approach. J Neurosurg 72: 15–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carey ME, Young HF, Mathis JL (1972) The neurosurgical treatment of craniocerebral missile wounds in Vietnam. Surg Gynecol Obstet 135: 386–390

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carey ME, Sacco W, Merkler J (1982) An analysis of fatal and non-fatal head wounds incurred during combat in Vietnam by U.S. forces. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 508: 351–356

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark WC, Muhlbauer MS, Watridge CB,et al (1986) Analysis of 76 civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. J Neurosurg 65: 9–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grahm TW, Williams FC Jr, Harrington T,et al (1990) Civilian gunshot wounds to the head: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 27: 696–699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurgian ES (1974) The treatment of penetrating wounds of the brain sustained in warfare: a historical review. J Neurosurg 39: 157–167

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammon WM (1971) Analysis of 2187 consecutive penetrating wounds of the brain from Vietnam. J Neurosurg 34: 127–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jennet B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1: 480–484

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathews WE (1972) The early treatment of craniocerebral missile injuries; experience with 92 cases. J Trauma 12: 939–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Myers PW, Brophy J, Salazar AM,et al (1989) Retained bone fragments after penetrating brain wound: long-term follow-up in Vietnam veterans. J Neurosurg 70: 319 A (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rappaport ZH, Sahar A, Shaked I,et al (1984) Computerised tomography in combat-related craniocerebral penetrating missile injuries. Br J Med Sci 20: 668–671

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salazar AM, Jabbari B, Vance SC,et al (1985) Epilepsy after penetrating head injury. I: Clinical correlates: a report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study. Neurology 35: 1406–1414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shoung HM, Sichez JP, Pertuiset B (1985) The early prognosis of craniocerebral gunshot wounds in civilian practice as an aid to the choice of treatment. A series of 56 cases studied by computerised tomography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 74: 27–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaudhri, K.A., Choudhury, A.R., Al Moutaery, K.R. et al. Penetrating craniocerebral shrapnel injuries during “Operation Desert Storm”: Early results of a conservative surgical treatment. Acta neurochir 126, 120–123 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476420

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476420

Keywords

Navigation