Abstract
In order to decide on a treatment strategy against gastric cancers, an accurate preoperative evaluation of the depth of cancer invasion is essential. Preoperative endoscopic diagnosis of the depth of invasion was compared with pathological results of the resected specimen in 206 early gastric cancers and 32 early-like advanced gastric cancers. The endoscopic distinction between early and early-like advanced cancers was correctly made in 83.6% of the cases. Among the early gastric cancers, mucosal and submucosal invasion was correctly presumed in 71.9% of the cases. When the tumor was an elevated type, or located in the antrum, the endoscopic diagnosis tended to be deeper than the true depth. The size of tumor contributed little to the depth diagnosis. Pathomorphological changes on the tips of converging folds were the important clue for diagnosing depth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tominaga S: Decreasing trend of stomach cancer in Japan. Jpn J Cancer Res (Gann) 78:1–10, 1987
Miller AB: Trends in cancer mortality and epidemiology. Cancer 51:2413–2418, 1983
Ohta H, Noguchi Y, Takagi K, Nishi M, Kajitani T, Kato Y: Early gastric carcinoma with special reference to macroscopic classification. Cancer 60:1099–1106, 1987
Furukawa H, Hiratuka M, Iwanaga T: A rational technique for surgical operation on Borrmann type 4 gastric carcinoma: Left upper abdominal evisceration plus Appleby's method. Br J Surg 75:116–119, 1988
Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer: The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Jpn J Surg 11:127–139, 1981
Tada M, Shimada M, Murakami F, Mizumachi M, Arima K, Yanai H, Oka S, Shigeeda M, Aibe T, Okazaki Y, Takemoto T, Murata M, Ogino M, Kinoshita Z, Kinoshita K: Development of the strip-off biopsy. Gastroenterol Endosc 26:833–839, 1984 (in Japanese, with English abstract)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sano, T., Okuyama, Y., Kobori, O. et al. Early gastric caner. Digest Dis Sci 35, 1340–1344 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536738
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536738