Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of bone mineral density in immobilization: A study on hemiplegic patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoporosis that develops during immobli-zation is a severe condition that confers increased risk of fractures with their burden of mortality and disability. The aim of this study was to investigate the determinants of immobilization osteoporosis. As a model of this condition we studied hemiplegic subjects, measuring bone mineral density in the paralyzed lower limb as compared with the non-paralyzed one. In spite of the limits related to the loss of nervous stimulation, this model offers the advantage of a proper control for the complex genetic and environmental cofactors involved. We examined 48 hemiplegic subjects (31 men, 17 women in menopause) admitted consecutively over a 9-month period. Mean length of immobilization was 10.9 months for men (range 1–48 months) and 7.8 months for women (range 1–40 months). The average time since menopause was 14.9 years (range 1.7–23.9 years). For each subject the following were performed: questionnaire, medical examination, anthropometric measurements, evaluation of the scores for spasticity and for lower limb motor capacity in order to account for the different degrees of disability among patients. Bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at both femoral necks. For each patient we defined a percentage difference in bone loss between the paralyzed and non-paralyzed limb. Regression coefficient were calculated by multiple logistic regression. There was significant bone loss in the paralyzed limb in both sexes, accounting for up to 6.3% in women. Multiple regression analysis showed that the degree of bone loss depends significantly and directly on the length of immobilization, even when controlling for age and sex in the regression model (R=0.193,p=0.034). However, when time since menopause was included in the regression model, with length of immobility as a covariate, it was the only significant determinant of bone loss (R=0.312,p=0.039). No additional factors were observed among men. No differences were shown with regard to anthropometric measurements or functional scores. Length of immobilization accounts only for a small fraction of bone loss, which does not exceed 5% of the total variance. Our data show that postmenopausal women should be considered at highest risk for osteoporosis in cases of immobility and that different factors, other than length of immobility, might come into play in determining bone loss in this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Minaire P. Immobilization osteoporosis: a review. Clin Rheumatol 1989;8:95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avoli LV. Significance of osteoporosis: a growing international health care problem. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49(Suppl):S5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiu KY, Pun WK, Lud KD, Chow SP. A prospective study on hip fractures in patients with previous cerebrovascular accidents. Injury 1992;23:297–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Donaldson CL, Hulley SB, Vogel JM, Hattner RS, Bayers JH, McMillan DE. Effect of prolonged bed rest on bone mineralization. Metabolism 1970;19:1071–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rodan GA, Thompson DD, Weinreb M. Characterization and pharmacological control of immobilization-induced bone resorption. In: Christiansen C, Johansen JS. Riis BJ, editors. Osteoporosis 1987. Copenhagen, Denmark: Osteopress, 1987:762–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uhthoff HK, Jaworski ZFG. Bone loss in response to long-term immobilization. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1978;60:420–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rambaut PC, Goode AW. Skeletal changes during space flight. Lancet 1985;4:1050–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hamdy RC, Krishnaswamy G, Cancellaro V, Whalen K, Harvill L. Changes in bone mineral content and density after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993;72:188–91.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Iversen E, Hassager C, Christiansen C. The effect of hemiplegia on bone mass and soft tissue body composition. Acta Neurol Scand 1989;79:155–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gluer CC, Faulkner KG, Estilo MJ, Engelke K, Rosin J, Genant HK. Quality assurance for bone densitometry research studies: concept and impact. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:227–35.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ashworth B. Preliminary trials of carisoprodal in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner 1964;192:540–2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lindmark B, Hamrin E. Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention: presentation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment and its reliability. Scand J Rehabil Med 1988;20:103–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mazess RB. Bone densitometry of the axial skeleton. Orthop Clin North Am 1990;21:51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kahn HA, Sempos CT. Statistical methods in epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989:137–67.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elias AN, Gwinup G. Immobilization osteoporosis in paraplegia. J Am Paraplegia Soc 1992;15:163–70.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Whedon GD. Disuse osteoporosis: physiological aspects. Calcif Tissue Int 1984;36:146–50.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reid IR, Ames R, Evans MC, Sharpe S, Gamble G, France JT, Lim TMT, Cundy TF. Determinants of total body and regional bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women: a key role for fat mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;75:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barzel US. Estrogens in the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review. Am J Med 1988;85:847–50.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Girasole G, Jilka RL, Passed G, Boswell S, Boder G, Williams DC, Manolagas SC. 17β-Estradiol inhibits interleukin-6 production by bone marrow-derived stromal cells and osteoblasts in vitro: a potential mechanism for the antiosteoporotic effect of estrogens. J Clin Invest 1992;89:883–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

del Puente, A., Pappone, N., Mandes, M.G. et al. Determinants of bone mineral density in immobilization: A study on hemiplegic patients. Osteoporosis Int 6, 50–54 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626538

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626538

Keywords

Navigation