Skip to main content
Log in

The natural history of symptomatic haemorrhoids

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to calculate the prognosis for a person who has developed a first episode of second degree haemorrhoids, 186 patients were randomly assigned to either no active treatment (expectant management) (n=91) or rubber band ligation (n=98) and reviewed every 6 months. The median follow-up period was 48 months in both groups with a range from 6–48 months in the banding group and from 18–48 months in the expectant management group. Rubber band ligation was performed at most three times with three weekly intervals. There were 6 treatment failures in the banding group in contrast to 31 in the expectant management groupp<0.01). The calculated recurrence rate by actuarial analysis among patients initially cured by rubber band ligation was 33% (95% confidence limits: 23–45) at four years and 61% (95% confidence limits: 48–74) in the expectant management group (p<0.05). It is concluded that rubber band ligation of symptomatic second degree haemorrhoids in up to three single treatments at three weekly intervals at the time of diagnosis significantly altered the prognosis without causing significant morbidity. However, 25% of the patients treated by expectant management never developed another episode during the four years observation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jensen SL, Harling H (in press) The natural history of silent haemorrhoids and the influence of dietary fibre on prognosis. Scand J Gastroent

  2. Goligher JC (1980) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, 4th edn. Baillière Tindall, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jensen SL, Harling H, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Nielsen OV, Tange G (1988) Maintenance bran in the prevention of haemorrhoidal symptoms after rubber band ligation of third degree haemorrhoids. Acta Chir Scand 154:395–398

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armitage P (1971) Statistical methods in medical research, 4th edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, London, Edinburgh, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baron J (1963) Office ligation treatment of haemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 6:109–113

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards FS (1988) The treatment of piles by injection. Br Med J 2:815–817

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chant ADB, May A, Wilken BJ (1972) Haemorrhoidectomy versus manual dilatation of the anus. Lancet 2:398–399

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goligher JC (1976) Cryosurgery for hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 19:213–218

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arabi Y, Gatehouse D, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MRB (1977) Rubber band ligation or lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 64:737–740

    Google Scholar 

  10. Murie JA, Sim AJW, Mackenzie I (1982) Rubber band ligation versus haemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing haemorrhoids: a long term prospective clinical trial. Br J Surg 69:536–538

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, S.L., Harling, H., Årseth-Hansen, P. et al. The natural history of symptomatic haemorrhoids. Int J Colorect Dis 4, 41–44 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648549

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648549

Keywords

Navigation