Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting leakage following esophageal anastomosis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Esophageal anastomotic leaks remain the most serious problem following extirpative procedures for esophageal carcinoma. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 352 patients with carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus who had undergone esophageal anastomosis following esophagectomy at the Kurume University Hospital between 1981 and 1990. Of these, 94 patients (27%) developed anastomotic leaks, and out of this subgroup, 21 (6%) died as a direct result of the leak. A further 20 patients (6%) underwent repair of the leak, after which they were able to tolerate oral intake. The anastomotic leak healed spontaneously in the other 53 patients (15%). The risk factors predisposing to leaks from esophageal anastomoses were determined as: (1) the anastomosis being performed via a retrosternal or subcutaneous route as opposed to an intrathoracic route, (2) the use of colonic interposition as opposed to a gastric pedicle, (3) performing a manual anastomosis as opposed to a mechanical anastomosis, and (4) employing an end-to-end anastomosis, as opposed to an end-to-side anastomosis, using a mechanical method. By introducing an anastomotic stapling device, a microvascular technique, a staged operation based on the preoperative risk analysis, and improvement in pre- and postoperative management, the incidence of anastomotic leakage could be decreased from 35% to 14%, and that of consequent hospital mortality, from 9% to 2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K (1991) Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 48:411–420

    Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases (1992) Guidelines for the clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus. Kanehara, Tokyo

  3. Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Tai Y, Yamana H, Shirohzu G, Yoshimura Y, Minami T, Negoto Y, Irie H, Shima I, Machi J (1988) Surgical treatment of cervical esophageal fistula following reconstruction. Dis Esophag 1:179–183

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fujita H, Inoue Y, Tanaka S, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Shirohzu G, Minami T, Tai Y, Hirano M (1991) Atypical free-gut transfer for esophageal reconstruction (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Kikan Shyokudouka Gakkai Kaiho (J Jpn Bronchoesophagol Soc) 42:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Diabetes Data Group (1979) Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 28:1039–1057

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dark JF, Mousalli H, Vaughan R (1981) Surgical treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus. Thorax 36:891–895

    Google Scholar 

  7. Postlethwait RW (1983) Complications and deaths after operation for esophageal carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 85:827–831

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu YK, Li YM, Gu YZ (1987) Cancer of esophagus and esophagogastric junction: Analysis of results of 1025 resections after 5 to 20 years. Ann Thorac Surg 43:176–181

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peracchia A, Bardini R, Ruol A, Asolati M, Scibetta D (1988) Esophageal anastomotic leak: A prospective statistical study of predisposing factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 95:685–691

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sugimachi K, Inokuchi K, Okudaira Y, Ueo H, Natsuda Y, Ikeda M, Nakamura T, Yaita A (1979) A safer and more reliable operative technique for esophageal reconstruction using a gastric tube (in Japanese with English abstract). Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi (J Jpn Surg Soc) 80:1164–1167

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sugimachi K, Ikeda M, Ueo H, Kai M, Okudaira Y, Inokuchi K (1982) Clinical efficacy of the stapled anastomosis in esophageal reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 33:374–378

    Google Scholar 

  12. Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Kawamura T (1979) Use of the stomach as a substitute of the esophagus (in Japanese). Rinshyo Geka (J Clin Surg) 34:695–702

    Google Scholar 

  13. Isono K, Onoda S, Okuyama K, Yamamoto Y, Asano T, Koide Y, Sato H (1985) Protection against suture insufficiency in antethoracic esophagogastrostomy. Jpn J Surg 15:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hermreck AS, Crawford DG (1976) The esophageal anastomotic leak. Am J Surg 132:794–798

    Google Scholar 

  15. El-Domeiri A, Martini N, Beattie EJ (1970) Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition. Arch Surg 100:358–362

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fujita H, Inoue Y, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Shirohzu G, Minami T, Tai Y (1991) Esophageal reconstruction using microvascular anastomosis to the thoracoacromial artery and cephalic vein. Jpn J Surg 21:512–516

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Fujita, H., Yamana, H. et al. Factors affecting leakage following esophageal anastomosis. Surg Today 24, 24–29 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676880

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01676880

Key Words

Navigation