Abstract
Objective
To describe the changes that have occurred in the United States since medicine has moved away from a paternalistic model to one that promotes patient autonomy and self-determination. To discuss the implications for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the increasing use of when not to perform CPR and other life-sustaining therapies. To describe the various interpretations of the ritual term Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) and to introduce the concept of futility in the context of non-beneficial over-treatment and discriminatory under-treatment.
Setting
Selected clinical, philosophical and public policy literature and two illustrative case examples.
Results
1. There is no longer a mandate to perform CPR on all dying patients, even though the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association in 1991 said that the only restrictions should be in patients with an irreversible terminal condition or when the physician writes the order, DNR. 2. The DNR order ususally requires the informed refusal of CPR by the patient or family. There is only minimal support for a unilateral decision even for patients with far advanced disease. 3. DNR is often the first step in the negotiated process of forgoing care in the ICU. There are multiple interpretations of DNR both in and outside of the ICU. 4. Health Proxy is the latest attempt to have a person clarify his/her wishes and preferences by naming a decision maker, if the individual losses mental capacity. 5. Although ethical principles seem well established, there are inconsistent interpretations and practices at the bedside in the United States in part due to the restructuring of the relationship between physicians and patients, providers and consumers/clients. 6. Objective severity scores such as Apache III, SAPS II, MPM II are generally not applicable for individual patient end-of-life decisions.
Conclusions
Although Health Proxy in its current formulation has been disappointing, there is a clear trend for wider application of DNR and for more active discussions about withholding or forgoing other life-sustaining therapies. DNR has a different interpretation late into the ICU course (>72h) than when applied at or shortly after ICU admission. Late in the ICU course, it has been decided by the medical team and family or surrogate decision maker/Health Proxy that the patient has failed or is in the process of failing aggressive ICU therapy. Early use of DNR may be related to limitations based on pre-existing chronic or subacute disease burden or an unwillingness to proceed with a full ICU course of therapy. It is unclear how Ethics Committees, risk management and hospital administrators, national practice guidelines, governmental sponsored health care reform will interface with the highly complex individual patient — physician — family — Health Proxy interface as practiced in the United States. Dialogue between the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Critical Care Medicine and among interested physicians could provide a format for a multi-cultural context to discuss end of life issues in the ICU setting.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
(1990) Advanced cardiac life support in perspective. In: Textbook of advanced cardiac life support, 2nd edn. American Heart Association
Bedell SE; Delbanco TL, Cook EF et al (1983) Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. N Engl J Med 309:569–576
(1986) Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial I Study Group: randomized clinical study of thiopental loading in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 314:397–403
Lawler J (1976) The ethical dilemma of resuscitation. Lancet 33:27
Spenser SS (1979) Code or no code: a non-legal opinion. New Engl J Med 300:138
(1991) Guidelines for the appropriate use of do-not-resuscitate orders. Council Report, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. JAMA 265:1868–1871
Stern SG; Orlowski JP (1992) DNR or CPR — the choice is ours. Crit Care Med 20:1263–1272
Teres D (1992) Les decisions de ne pas réanimer: la tendance actuelle aux Etats-Unis. Annales Medicales de Nancy et de L'Est 31:301–304
Tomlinson T, Brody H (1988) Ethics and communication in do-not-resuscitate orders. N Engl J Med 318:43
Dinnerstein 380 NE2d. 134–135 (Mass App 1978)
Taffet GE, Teasdale TA, Luchi RJ (1988) In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. JAMA 260:2069–2072
Lipton HL (1986) Do-not-resuscitate decisions in a community hospital — incidence, implications and outcomes. JAMA 256: 1164–1169
Smedira NG, Evans BH, Grais LS et al. (1990) Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med 322:309–315
Rapoport J, Teres D, Lemeshow S (1992) Resource use implications of do not resuscitate orders for ICU patients. Intensive Care Medicine 18:S83
Teres D, Rapoport J, Lemeshow S (1993) Crit Care Med 21:S178
Groeger JS, Guntupalli KK, Strosberg M et al (1993) Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States: patient characteristics and intensive care unti utilization. Crit Care Med 21:279–291
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Bioethical Behavioral Research: Deciding to forego lifesustaining treatment. Washington DC, US Government Printing Office, 1983
Danis M, Southerland LI, Garrett JM et al (1991) A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care. N Engl J Med 324:882–888
Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JM et al (1991) Advance directives for medical care: a case for greater use. N Engl J Med 324:889–895
Cruzan V, Director Missouri Department of Health, 50 CCH S. Ct. Bull. p B4139 (July 25, 1990)
(1991) Special report: sources of concern about the patient self-determination act. N Engl J Med 325:1666–1671
Paris JJ, Reardon FE (1991) An ethical and legal analysis of problems in critical care medicine. In: Rippe J (ed) Intensive care medicine, 2nd edn. Little, Brown and Company, Boston
(1986) NIH Workshop Summary. Withholding and withdrawing mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 134:1327–1330
Wanzer SH, Adelstein SJ, Cranford RE (1984) The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. N Engl J Med 310:955–959
American College of Physicians Ethics Committee (1992) American College of physicians ethics manual, 3rd edn. Ann Intern Med 117:947–960
Ruark JE, Raffin TA and The Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics (1988) Initiating and withdrawing life support. N Engl J Med 318:25–30
Sprung CL (1990) Changing attitudes and practices in forgoing lifesustaining treatments. JAMA 263:2211–2215
Faber-Langendoen K, Bartels D (1992) Process of forgoing life-sustaining treatment in a university hospital: an empirical study. Crit Care Med 20:570–577
Solomon M, O'Donnell L, Jennings B, Guilfoy V, Wolf SM, Molan K, Jackson R, Koch-Weser D, Donnelley S (1993) Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments. Am J Pub Health 83:14–23
Civetta JM (1993) Nosocomial respiratory failure or iatrogenic ventilator dependency. Crit Care Med 21:171–173
Banner MJ, Blanch PB, Kirby RR (1993) Imposed work of breathing and methods of triggering a demand-flow, continuous positive airway pressure system. Crit Care Med 21:183–190
Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ (1982) Clinical ethics. Macmillan, New York, pp 35–37
Edwards MJ, Tolle SW (1992) Disconnecting a ventilator at the request of a patient who knows he will then die: the doctor's anguish. Ann Intern Med 117:e254–256
Orentlicher D (1992) The illusion of patient choice in end-of-life decisions. JAMA 267:2101–2104
Tomlinson T, Brody H (1990) Futility and the ethics of resuscitation. JAMA 264:1276–1296
Truog RD; Brett AS, Frader J (1992) The problem with futility. N Engl J Med 326:1560–1564
Angell M (1991) The case of Helga Wanglie: a new kind of “right to die” case. N Engl J Med 325:511–512
Miles SH (1991) Informed demand for “non-beneficial” medical treatment. N Engl J Med 325:512–515
Solomon M (1992) “Futility” as a criterion in limiting treatment. N Engl J Med 327:1239
Lo B (1991) Unanswered questions about DNR orders. JAMA 14:1874–1875
Rie MA (1991) Helga Wanglie's ventilator: the limits of a wish. Hastings Center Rep 21:4:24–27
Lemeshow S, Teres D, Spitz Avrunin J, Pastides H (1987) A comparison of methods to predict mortality of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 15:715–722
Teres D, Avrunin JS, Lemeshow S (1991) Prediction modeling. In: Rippe JM (ed) Intensive care medicine, 2nd edn. Little Brown and Company, Boston
Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Zimmerman JE, Bergner M, Bastos PG, Sirio CA, Murphy DJ, Lotring T, Damiano A, Harrell FE (1991) The Apache III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636
Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J (1993) MPM II: mortality probability models based on 19124 patients. Crit Care Med 21:S175
Watts CM, Knaus WA: The case for using objective scoring systems to predict ICU outcome: a viewpoint. Crit Care Clin (in press)
Teres D, Lemeshow S: Why severity models should be used with caution. Crit Care Clin (in press)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported in part by the Richard and Edith Strauss Canada Foundation
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teres, D. Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 19, 316–322 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01694704
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01694704