Skip to main content
Log in

Defecography: II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our simple method of defecography has proved to be more sensitive than clinical evaluation in the detection and description of defecation disorders. Among the different types of disorders, described on the basis of 144 abnormal defecograms, the most common are rectal intussusception (RI), intraanal rectal intussusception (IRI), external manually (EMRP) or spontaneously (ESRP) reducible prolapses, rectocele, and accentuation of the impression of the puborectalis sling (AIPR).

Study of the mean values of the anorectal angle (ARA) (normal mean value=92° at rest) reveals an increase (p<0.05) in the ARA in IRI and ESRP and a decrease (p<0.05 at rest,p<0.001 at strain) in AIPR. The most striking observation is a highly significant increase (p<0.001) in the ARA associated with incontinence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schweiger M, Alexander-Williams J: Solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Its association with occult rectal prolapse.Lancet 1:170–171, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P: Description of an easy defecography procedure and results in normal patients (part one).Gastrointest Radiol 9:247–251, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J: The syndrome of the descending perineum.Proc R Soc Med 59:477–482, 1966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Almy TP: The gastrointestinal tract in man under stress. In Sleisenger MH Fordtran JS (eds):Gastrointestinal Disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1978, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rutter KPR, Riddell RH: The solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum.Clin Gastroenterol 4:505–530, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duthie HL: Defaecation and the anal sphincters.Clin Gastroenterol 11:621–631, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Vanheuverzwijn R, Goncette L: Les prolapsus du rectum: apport du lavement baryté et de la défécographie.Acta Gastroenterol Belg 44:502–512, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Broden B, Snellman B: Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography: a contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism.Dis Colon Rectum 11:330–347, 1968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parks AG: Anorectal incontinence.Proc R Soc Med 68:681–690, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Swash M: Idiopathic faecal incontinence: histopathological evidences on pathogenesis. In Wright R (ed):Recent Advance in Gastro-Intestinal Pathology. London: WB Saunders, 1980, pp 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  11. Engle BT, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM: Operant conditioning of recto-sphincteric responses in the treatment of fecal incontinence.N Engl J Med 290:646–649, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE, Parks AG: Balloon proctogram: a new technique of the study of disorders of defaecation.Gut 23:437, 1982

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahieu, P., Pringot, J. & Bodart, P. Defecography: II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 9, 253–261 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887846

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887846

Key words

Navigation