Skip to main content
Log in

Midgut malrotation, the reliability of sonographic diagnosis

  • Selected Papers from the IPR Meeting in Stockholm, Sweden, 27–31 May 1991
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We are unaware of any other anatomical study which deals with normal variations in the relationship between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the superior mesenteric vein (SMV). In our investigation in the majority of cases, the SMV lies to the right of the SMA. It has been suggested that ultrasonographic demonstration of a left sided SMV, is characteristic of midgut malrotation so a prospective study was undertaken in order to try to correlate the position of the mesenteric vessels on Ultrasound with the radiological diagnosis of midgut malrotation on upper GI series. 427 children (95% infants) who were planned for upper GI investigation, have had color Doppler U.S. of the mesenteric vessels before the barium study. In 67 cases, the mesenteric vessels were obscured by intestinal gas. Among them, there were 2 cases of malrotation. Three different positions of the mesenteric vessels were found in the 360 remaining cases. 1) A left sided SMV was found in 4% of the cases, all had midgut malrotation on X-rays and at surgery. 2) A mesenteric vein anterior to the SMA was found in 5% of the cases, 28% had midgut malrotation. 3) A normal right sided SMV was found in 91% of the cases. However 3% of these had midgut malrotation. There are anatomical variations in the position of the mesenteric vessels and a normal relationship between SMA and SMV does not ecxclude the possibility of intestinal malrotation. Nevertheless, ultrasound remains a useful noninvasive screening technique for the diagnosis of midgut malrotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. David M, Nichols DM, Li DK (1983) Superior mesenteric vein rotation: a CT sign of midgut malrotation. AJR 141: 707–708

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pracros JP, Basset T, Morin de Finfe CH, Louis D, Tran-Minh VA (1988) Aspects échographiques dans le volvulus du grèle sur malrotation chez le nouveauné. Pédiatrie 43: 525–529

    Google Scholar 

  3. Loyer E, Eggli KD (1989) Sonographic evaluation of superior mesenteric vascular relationship in malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 19: 173–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bill AH, Ravitch MM, Welch KJ, Benson CD, Aberdeen E, Randolph JG (1979) Malrotation of the intestine. Pediatr surgery, 3rd ed. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago London, pp 912–923

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mairlot MC, Willocx RG (1984) Les malrotations du tube digestif. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 47: 451–463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howell CG, Vozza F, Shaw S, Robinson M, Srouy MN, Kraana I, Ziegler MM (1982) Malrotation, malnutrition, and ischemic bowel disease. J Pediatr Surg 17: 469–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Potts SR, Thomas PS, Garstin WIH, McGoldrick J (1985) The duodenal triangle: a plain film sign of midgut malrotation and volvulus in the neonate. Clin Radiol 36: 47–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howard C, Filston, Kirks DR (1981) Malrotation — the ubiquitous anomaly. J Pediatr Surg 16: 614–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart DR, Colodny AL, Daggett WC (1976) Malrotation of the bowel in infants and children: a 15 year review. Surgery 79: 716–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zerin JM, Di Pietro MA (1991) Mesenteric vascular anatomy at CT: normal and abnormal appearances. Radiology 179: 739–742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teele R (1991) Personal comments at IPR 91, Stockholm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dufour, D., Delaet, M.H., Dassonville, M. et al. Midgut malrotation, the reliability of sonographic diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 22, 21–23 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011604

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02011604

Keywords

Navigation