Skip to main content
Log in

Visual 3D illusion: A systems-theoretical approach to psychosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Binocular depth inversion represents an illusion of visual perception. Such an inversion does not occur in all cases, especially when objects with a higher degree of familiarity (e.g. photographs of faces) are displayed. Cognitive factors are assumed to override the binocular disparity cues of stereopsis. We tested the hypothesis that during psychotic and similar states the human CNS is unable to correct the implausible perceptual hypothesis. Measurements of binocular depth inversion in perception of 3D objects were performed in schizophrenic patients (n=13), in patients with alcohol withdrawal (n=10), in sleep-deprived medical staff (n=10) and in healthy volunteers (n=41). The binocular depth inversion scores were highly elevated in the patient group and in the sleep-deprivated medical staff in comparison with healthy volunteers. The data demonstrate that impairment of binocular depth inversion reflects a common final pathway, characterized by an impairment of adaptive systems regulating perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broadbent D (1958) Perception and communication, Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlsson A (1988) Speculations on the control of mental and motor functions by dopamine-modulated cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical feedback loops. M Sinai J Med

  3. Chapman LJ, Chapman JP (1973) Disordered thought in schizophrenia. Meredith, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emrich HM (1988) Zur Entwicklung einer Systemtheorie produktiver Psychosen. Nervenarzt 59:456–464

    Google Scholar 

  5. Emrich HM (1989) A three-component-system-hypothesis of psychosis. Impairment of binocular depth inversion as an indicator of functional dysequilibrium. Br J Psychiatry 155 (Suppl 5):37–39

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emrich HM, Weber MM, Wendl A, Zihl J, Meyer L von, Hanisch W (1991) Reduced binocular depth inversion as an indicator of cannabis-induced censorship impairment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 40:689

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frith CD, Done DJ (1989) Experiences of alien control in schizophrenia reflect a disorder in central monitoring of action. Psychol Med 19:356–363

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frith CD, Done DJ (1988) Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 153:437–443

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gray JA, Rawlins JNP (1986) Comparator and buffer memory: an attempt to integrate two models of hippocampal functions. In: Isaacson RL, Pribram KH (eds) The hippocampus, vol 4. Plenum Press, New York, pp 159–201

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heinemann LG (1966) Der mehrtägige Schlafentzug in der experimentallen Psychoseforschung: Psychopathologie und EEG. Arch Psychiatr Z. Ges Neurologie 208:177–197

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huxley A (1954) The doors of perception. Chatto and Windus, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malenka RC, Angel RW, Hampton B, Berger PA (1982) Impaired central error-correcting behavior in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39:101–107

    Google Scholar 

  13. McGie A, Chapman J (1961) Disorders of attention and perception in early schizophrenia. Br J Med Psychol 34:103–117

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mumford D (1992) On the computational architecture of the neocortex. Biol Cybern 66:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  15. Olton DS (1989) Mnemonic functions of the hippocampus: single unit analyses in rats. In: Chan-Palay V, Köhler C (eds) The hippocampus: new vistas. Liss, New York, pp 411–424

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sullivan JT, Sykora K, Schneidermann J, Naranjo CA, Sellers EM (1989) Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale. Br J Addiction 84:1353–1357

    Google Scholar 

  17. Van den Enden A, Spekreijse H (1989) Binocular depth reversals despite familiarity cues. Science 244:959–961

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wagemans J, Kolinsky R (1994) Perceptual organisation and object recognition—POOR is the acronym, rich the notion. Perception 23(4):371–382

    Google Scholar 

  19. Watzlawick P (1985) Wirklichkeitsanpassung oder die angepasste “Wirklichkeit”? In: Einführung in den Kontruktivismus (Schriften der Carl-Friedrich-von-Siemens-Stifung, Bd. 10) Oldenbourg, München

    Google Scholar 

  20. West L, Janszen HH, Lester B, Comelisoon FS (1962) The psychosis of sleep deprivation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 96:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wheatstone C (1838) Proc R Soc 128:371–394

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wheatstone C (1852) Philos Mag 4:504

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wolf R (1985) Binokulares Sehen, Raumverrechnung und Raumwahrnehmung. Biologie unserer Zeit 15:161–178

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yellott JI (1981) Binocular depth inversion. Sci Am 245:118–125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmeider, U., Leweke, F.M., Sternemann, U. et al. Visual 3D illusion: A systems-theoretical approach to psychosis. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Nuerosci 246, 256–260 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190277

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02190277

Key words

Navigation