Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic criteria of discogenic paresis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This discourse is aimed at elucidating prognostic criteria for the assessment of the course of a paresis in the case of lumbar disc herniation. Fourhundred and fifty patients were examined who had been operated on for lumbar disc herniation at the Orthopaedic University Clinic Mainz between 1986 and 1991. Of these, 240 showed radicular paralytic symptoms. They were examined prior to the operation, immediately afterwards and 1 year after the operation. The influence of the degree of intensity of the paresis, the time elapsed since the occurrence and other factors like nerve root affected, intraoperative findings, age, sex and weight of the patient were registered. It is obvious that the degree of intensity of a paresis is a good prognostic criterion for the assessment of the postoperative course. A paresis classified as grade III or IV receded in more than 70% of the cases within 6 months. For a paresis of grade 11, the recovery rate was 40%. In the case of a total paresis, no complete neurological recovery was registered. The period of time which had elapsed since the occurrence of the paresis, the weight of the patient, the nerve root affected and other factors did not show any significant influence. As a criterion for an emergency or postponed operation on a herniated disc, the duration of paralytic symptoms should therefore be attributed less importance than the progression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson H, Carlsson CA (1966) Prognosis of operatively treated lumbar disc herniations causing foot extensor paralysis. Acta Chir Scand 132:501–506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bues E, Markakis E (1969) Über die postoperative ù neurologischer Ausfälle und zur Frage des Operationstermines beim medialen lumbalen Bandscheibenvorfall. Dtsch Z Nervenheilkd 195:6–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hakelius A (1970) Prognosis in sciatica. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 129

  4. Hirsch C, Nachemson A (1963) The reliability of lumbar disc surgery. Clin Orthop 29:189–195

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knutsson B (1962) How often do the neurological signs disappear after the operation of a herniated disc? Acta Orthop Scand 32:352–356

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nachemson A (1976) The lumbar spine - an orthopaedic challenge. Spine 1:59–71

    Google Scholar 

  7. O'Connell JEA (1951) Protrusions of the lumbar intervertebral discs. A clinical review based on five hundred cases treated by the excision of the protrusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 33:8–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. O'Laoire SA, Crockard HA, Thomas DG (1981) Prognosis for sphincter recovery after operation for cauda equina compression owing to lumbar disc prolapse. Br Med J 282:1852–1854

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pasztor E, Juhasz J (1960) Kaudasyndrom verursachende mediale Diskushernien. Zentralbl Neurochir 20:159–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shepard RH (1959) Diagnosis and prognosis of cauda equina sandrome produced by protrusion of lumbar disk. Br Med J 259:1434–1439

    Google Scholar 

  11. Weber H (1975) The effect of delayed disc surgery on muscular paresis. Acta Orthop Scand 46:631–642

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weigert M (1967) Die ù der neurologischen Zeichen nach Bandscheibenoperation. Z Orthop 103:294–298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eysel, P., Rompe, J.D. & Hopf, C. Prognostic criteria of discogenic paresis. Eur Spine J 3, 214–218 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221595

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221595

Key words

Navigation