Skip to main content
Log in

Factors associated with the use of screening mammography in a primary care setting

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite consensus recommendations the usse of screening mammography remins low. We examined physician and patient related variables associated with requests to undergo screening mammography in a primary care setting, in order to assess current barriers to screening mammography at the level of the physician-patient interaction. A sample of 261 women over the age of 50, whose primary care was provided by resident physician in a large, urban, academic medical center were examined. Data concerning patients and physicians demographic and clinical chracteristics were abstracted. The data were analyzed by Chi-square and stepwise logistic regression. Forty-five percent of the patients were offered screening mammography within the study year and 53% were offered mammography over the preceding two years. Variables significantly associated with a request for screening included a previous history of breast disease (p<.001) and the severity of the patient's overall medical conditoin. Patients with an overall medical condition rated as mild were more likely to be requested to undergo screening than patients rated as moderately or severely ill (p<.01). Patients with higher educational levels were also more likely to be offered screening (P=.06). First year popstgraduate (PGY 1) physicians requested more mammograms than PGY 2 or PGY 3 physicians (P<.05). A multivariable model utilizing logistic regression confirmed the association of the significant variables above with screening requests. Physicians were more likely to request mammography in patients at higher risk for developing breast cancer and less likely to request it in patients who had co-morbid illness. Increasing physician understanding of the importance and benefits of mammography and further investigation of strategies to ensure ophysician compliance with mammography recommendations are necessary to increase utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borin CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics.CA 43:7–26, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shapiro S Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Ten-to-fourteen effec of screening on breast cancer mortality.JNCI 69:349–55. 1982.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker LH. Breast cancer detection demonstration project: Five year summary report.CA 32:1–35, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJG, Gad A., et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass sceening with mammography: Randomized trial from the breast cancer screening working group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.Lancet i:829–32. 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Collette HJA, Day NE, Rombach JJ, et al. Evaluation of screening from breast cancer in a non-randomized study (the DOM project) by menas of a case-control study.Lancet i:1224–6. 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R, et al. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammograophy. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975–1981.Lancet i:1222–4, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. US Preventive Serices Task Force: Recommendation for breast cancer screening.JAMA 257:2196. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V, McGivney W, Hendee W. The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.JAMA 259:1512–9. 1988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bailar JC, Mammography before age 50 years?JAMA 259:1548–9. 1988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Survey of physician' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.CA 35:197–213. 1985.

  11. Bassett LW, Bunnell DH, Cerny JA, Gold RH, Screening mammograophy: referral practices of Los Angeles physicians.ARJ 147:689–92, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Battista RN, Adult cancer prevention in primary care: pattern of practice in Quebec.Am J Pub Hlth 73:1036–39. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Howard J. Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential.CA 37:33–48. 1987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Provisional estimates from the National Health Interview Survey supplement on cancer control — United States, January–March 1987.MMWR 37:417–25. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. State-to-state variation in screening mammograms for women 50 years of age and older-Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987.MMWR 38:157–60. 1989.

  16. Trends in screening mammograms for women 50 years of age and older — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987.MMWR 38:137–40. 1989.

  17. 1989 surey of physician's attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.CA 40:77–101. 1990.

  18. Use of mammography — United States, 1990.MMWR 39:621–30. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cummings KM, Funch DP, Mettlin C, Jennings E. Family physicians' beliefs about breast cancer screening by mammography.J Fam Pract 17:1029–34. 1983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Albanes D, Weinberg GB, Boss L Taylor PR, A survey of physicians' breast cancer early detection practices.Prev Med 17:643–52. 1988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McPhee SJ, Richard RJ, Solkowitz SJ. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society guidelines.J Gen Int Med 1:275–81. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Woo B. Woo B, Cook EF, et al. Screening procedures in the asymptomatic adult: comparison of physicians' recommendations, patient's desieres, published guidelines and actual practice.JAMA 254:1480–84. 1985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Romm FJ, Fletcher SW, Hulka BS: The periodic health exmanination: comparison of recommendations and internists' performance.South Med J 74:265–76. 1981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dietrich AJ, Goldberg H, Preventive content of adult priomary care: Do generalists and subspecialists differ?Am J Pub Hlth 74:223–7. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women: Does the sex of the physicain matter?New Engl J Med 1993;329:478–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fliess JL:Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Strax P. Scrrening for breast cancer.Clin Obstet Gynecol 20:781–801. 1977.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hayward RA, Shapiro MF, Freeman HE, Corey CR. Who gets creened for cerical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.Arch Intern Med 148:1177–81. 1988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Screening mammography: a missed clinical opportunity? Results of the NCI breast cancer screening consortim and Natoanl Health Interview Survey studies.JAMA 264:54–58. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gemson DH, Elinson J, Messeri P. Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients.J Community Hlth 13:53–64. 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lurie N, Manning WG, Peterson C, Goldberg GA, Phelps CA, Lillard CA, Lillard L. Preventive care: Do we paractice what we preach?Am J Publ Hlth 77:801–804. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rimer BK, Davis SW, Engsrom PF, Meyrs RE, Rosan JR. Some reasons for compliance and noncompliance in a healkth maintenance organization breast cancer screening program.J Compliance Hlth Care 3:103–114. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson GB, Kessler LG, Boss LP. Breast cancer screening legislation in the United States: a commentary.Am J Pub Hlth 79:1541–3. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  34. A study of women's awareness and use of mammograms. New York, NY: Lieberman Research Inc; 1987.

  35. Burack RC, Liang J. The acceptance and completion of mammograhy by older black women.Am J Pub Hlth 79:721–726. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rimer BK, Keintz MK, Kessler HB, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR, Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.Radiology 172:243–6. 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fox SA, Stein JA. The effect of physician-patient communciation on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups.Medical Care 29:1065–82. 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women.Arch Intern Med 151:50–6. 1991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Braham RL, Weisel MJ, Charlson ME, Douglas RG. Closing the clinics: Would it cose the teaching hospital?Am J Med 80:71–76. 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vogel VG, Peters GN, Fueger JJ, Beinvenu OJ, Wilson E. The American Cancer Society Texas Breast Screening Project [Abstract]. In:Programs and abstracts of prevention ′88: prevention and primary care. Atlanta: American College of Preventive Medicine, American College of Teachers of Preventive Medicine, 1988:22.

  41. Winchester DP, Lasky HJ, Sylvester J, Maher ML. A television-promoted mammography screening pilot project in the Chicago metropolitan area.CA 38:291–309. 1988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Jenkins CNH, Fordham D. Promoting cancer scrrening: a randomized, controlled trial of three interventions.Arch Int Med 149:1866–72. 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nattinger AB, Panzer RJ, Janus J. Improving the utilization of screening mammography in primary care practices.Arch Int Med 149:2087–92. 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Chambers CV, Balaban DJ, Carlson BL, Ungemack JA, Grasberger DM. Microcomputergenerated reminders. Improving the compliance of primary care physicians with mammography screening guidelines.J Fam Pract 29:273–80. 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoen, R.E., Marcus, M. & Braham, R.L. Factors associated with the use of screening mammography in a primary care setting. J Community Health 19, 239–252 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260384

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02260384

Keywords

Navigation