Skip to main content
Log in

Time-limit tests: Estimating their reliability and degree of speeding

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-spurious methods are needed for estimating the coefficient of equivalence for speeded tests from single-trial data. Spuriousness in a split-half estimate depends on three conditions; the split-half method may be used if any of these is demonstrated to be absent. A lower-bounds formula,r c, is developed. An empirical trial of this coefficient and other bounds proposed by Gulliksen demonstrates that, for moderately speeded tests, the coefficient of equivalence can be determined approximately from single-trial data. It is proposed that the degree to which tests are speeded be investigated explicitly, and an indexτ is advanced to define this concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adkins, D. C. Construction and analysis of achievement tests. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baxter, B. An experimental analysis of the contribution of speed and level in an intelligence test.J. educ. Psychol., 1941,32, 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buros, O. K. (Ed.) The third mental measurements yearbook. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conrad, H. Information which should be provided by test publishers and testing agencies on the validity and use of their tests. Proceedings, 1949 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, pp. 63–68. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient “alpha” and the internal structure of tests. To be published.

  6. Cronbach, L. J. Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cronbach, L. J. Test “reliability”: its meaning and determination.Psychometrika, 1947,12, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson, W. M., and Carroll, J. B. Speed and level components in time-limit scores, a factor analysis.Educ. psychol. Meas., 1945,5, 411–427.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guilford, J. P. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gulliksen, H. The reliability of speeded tests.Psychometrika, 1950,15, 259–269.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guttman, L. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.Psychometrika, 1945,10, 255–282.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iowa Silent Reading Test, Manual. Yonkers: World Book Co., 1943.

  13. Paterson, D. G., and Tinker, M. A. Time-limitvs. work-limit methods.Amer. J. Psychol., 1930,42, 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tate, M. W. Individual differences in speed of response in mental test materials of varying degrees of difficulty.Educ. psychol. Meas., 1948,8, 353–374.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thurstone, T. G., and Thurstone, L. L. Mechanical aptitude III: Description of group tests. Psychometric Laboratory Reports, No. 55, 1949.

  16. Thorndike, R. L. Personnel selection. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1949.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cronbach, L.J., Warrington, W.G. Time-limit tests: Estimating their reliability and degree of speeding. Psychometrika 16, 167–188 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289113

Keywords

Navigation