Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method

  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Femoral neck anteversion is the torsion of the femoral head with reference to the distal femur. Conventional methods that use cross-sectional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance or ultrasound images to estimate femoral anteversion have met with several problems owing to the complex, three-dimensional (3D) structure of the femur. These problems include not only the difficulty of defining the direction of the femoral neck axis and condylar line but also the dependency upon patient positioning. In particular, the femoral neck axis, the direction of the femoral head, known as the major source of error, is difficult to determine from either a single or several two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional images. A new method has been devised for the measurement of femoral anteversion using the 3D imaging technique. 3D reconstructed CT images from the femoral head and trochanter to the distal femur are used to measure the anteversion. It is necessary to remove the soft tissue from the CT images and extract just the bone part. Then, the femoral anteversion is measured from a computer-rendered femur image. The 3D imaging method is compared with both the conventional 2D method and the physical method using 20 dried femurs. For the physical method, which is used as a reference value, a special apparatus is devised. The average difference between the results of the physical method and those of the 2D CT method is 5.33°. The average difference between the results of the physical method and those of the 3D imaging method is 0.45°. Seventy-four patients, who suffer from toe-in-gait disease, are tested to compare the 3D imaging method with the conventional 2D CT method. The average difference between the 2D and 3D methods is 8.6°, and the standard is 7.43°. This method provides a very accurate and reliable measurement of femoral anteversion, as it is virtually equivalent to the direct measurement of bisected dried femur in vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, M. F., Sutherland, D. H., Wenger, D. R., andMubarak, S. J. (1994): ‘Evaluation of CT-scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip’,J. Pediatr. Orthop.,14, pp. 48–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Billing, L. (1954): ‘Roentgen examination of the proximal femur end in children and adolescents’,Acta Radiol. Diagn., (Suppl.),110

  • Egund, N., andPalmer, J. (1984): ‘Femoral anatomy described in cylindrical coordinates using computed tomography’,Acta Radiol. Diagn.,25, pp. 209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, K. L., andEgund, N. (1997): ‘CT measurement of anteversion in the femoral neck. The influence of femur positioning’,Acta Radiol.,38, pp. 527–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, R. J., Tachdjian, M. O., Poznanski, A. K., andDias, L. S. (1981). ‘CT determination of femoral torsion’,Am. J. Radiol.,137, pp. 97–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Høiseth, A., Reikerás, O., andFonstelien, E. (1988): ‘Aspects of femoral neck anteversion. Theoretical considerations and experimental results’,Acta Radiol.,29, pp. 689–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Høiseth, A., Reikerás, O., andFønstelien, E. (1989): ‘Evaluation of three methods for measurement of femoral neck anteversion. Femoral neck anteversion, definition, measuring methods and errors’,Acta Radiol.,30, pp. 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. B., Simon, S. R., Kijewski, P. K., Wilkinson, R. H., andGriscom, N. T. (1987): ‘Femoral anteversion’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,69-A, pp. 1169–1176

    Google Scholar 

  • Reikerás, O., Høiseth, A., andReigstad, A. (1985): ‘Femoral anteversion measured by the Dunlap/Rippstein and Norman methods’,Acta Radiol. Diagn.,26, pp. 303–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Robb, R. A., andBarillot, C. (1986): ‘Interactive display and analysis of 3-D medical images’,IEEE Med. Imag.,8–3, pp. 217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, L., Mital, M. A., O'Connor, J., andPatel, U. (1979): ‘Anteversion of the femoral neck. Comparison of methods of measurement in patients’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,61-A, pp. 45–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Laubenberger, J., Jemlich, S., Groene, K., Weber, H. M., andLanger, M. (1997): ‘Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging’,Br. J. Radiol.,70, pp. 575–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, D. S., andCook, A. J. (1980): ‘Practical considerations in the use of computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion’,Isr. J. Med. Sci.,16, pp. 288–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedge, J. H., Munkacsi, I., andLoback, D. (1989): ‘Anteversion of the femur and idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,71-A, pp. 1040–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, Y., Siu, D., andCooke, T. D. V. (1987): ‘The anatomy and functional axes of the femur’,J. Bone Joint Surg.,69-A, pp. 873–880

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, J.S., Park, T.S., Park, S.B. et al. Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38, 603–609 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344864

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344864

Keywords

Navigation