Skip to main content
Log in

Management of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus open surgery

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is becoming more widely employed as a therapeutic option for the management of gallbladder stones (GBS) and common bile duct stones (CBDS). To compare the results of LC plus preoperative EST with the results of open surgery, in terms of morbidity, mortality, hospital stay, length of operation, and hospital cost, we reviewed the charts of 105 patients who had concomitant GBS and CBDS: in 34, preoperative EST had been attempted, and 71 had undergone open surgery. Twenty-six of the 71 patients who had undergone open cholecystectomy, common bile duct exploration, and T-tube placement were selected for comparison as a T-tube group, since they had exhibited no condition that contraindicated LC. EST was unsuccessful in 6 of the 34 patients in whom it was attempted, and all 6 underwent open surgery. Successful EST and duct clearance were achieved in 28 patients (82.4%); 4 of them had serious medical problems and were followed without operation, 7 underwent open cholecystectomy, and the remaining 17 underwent LC (LC-after-EST group). Total hospital stay was longest in the 6 patients who underwent open surgery because of unsuccessful EST, and their total hospital cost was significantly higher than that of the patients in the LC-after-EST group. Operation time, rate of early postoperative complications, and hospital stay were significantly lower in the LC-after-EST group than in the T-tube groups, although total hospital cost was not different. The combination of preoperative EST and LC is a safe and effective option for the management of GBS and CBDS. However, when EST is unsuccessful and the patient is switched to open surgery, the hospital stay is much longer and more costly than when EST and LC are successful. The patient should be informed of the disadvantages if EST should fail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jatzko GR, Lisborg PH, Pertl AM, Stettner HM (1995) Multivariate comparison of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 221:381–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Perissat J, Huibregtse K, Kaene FBV, Russell RCG, Neoptolemos JP (1994) Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 81:799–810

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Der Hul RL, Plaisier PW, Hamming JF, Bruining HA, Van Blankenstein M (1993) Detection and management of common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 28:929–933

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Philips EH, Liberman M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Rosenthal RJ, Hiatt JR (1995) Bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. Is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? Arch Surg 130:880–886

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs M, Verdeja J, Goldstein HS (1991) Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy. J Laparosc Surg 1:79–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patelin J (1991) Laparoscopic approach to common duct pathology. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1:33–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Paula AL, Hashiba K, Bafutto M (1994) Laparoscopic management of choledcholithiasis. Surg Endosc 8:1399–1403

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kawai K, Akasaka Y, Murakami K, Tada M, Kohri Y, Nakajima M (1974) Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the ampulla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc 20:148–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ikeda S, Tanaka M, Matsumoto S, Yoshimoto H, Ito H (1988) Endoscopic sphincterotomy: Long-term results in 408 patients with complete follow up. Endoscopy 20:13–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leese T, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL (1985) Successes, failure, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: Results in 394 consecutive patients from a single center. Br J Surg 72:215–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP (1987) Prospective randomized study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile stones. BMJ 294:470–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller BM, Kozarek RA, Ryan JA, Ball TJ, Traverso LW (1988) Surgical versus endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 207:135–141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stigmann GV, Goff JS, Mansour A, Pearlman N, Reveille RM, Norton L (1992) Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg 163:227–230

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maurice EA, Davis CJ, Arkush AM, Nagan RF (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  15. Inoue H, Muraoka Y, Kobori Y, Hirata R, Takeshita K, Goseki N, Yoneshima H, Endo M (1992) Combination therapy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and endoscopic transpapillary lithotripsy for both cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 6:246–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Graham SM, Flowers JL, Soctt TR, Bailey RW, Socvill WA, Zucker KA, Imbembo AL (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. The utility of planned perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy: Experience with 63 patients. Ann Surg 218:61–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Franceschi D, Brandt C, Margolin D, Szopa B, Ponsky J, Priebe P, Stellato T, Eckhauser ML (1993) The management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 59:525–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Widdson Al, Longstaff AJ, Armstrong CP (1994) Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of gallstones and bile duct stones: A prospective study. Br J Surg 81:595–597

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cisek PL, Greaney GC (1994) The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Am Surg 60:772–776

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE (1995) Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 170:619–623

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller RE, Kimmelstiel FM, Winkler WP (1995) Management of common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169:273–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kano N, Yamakawa T, Kasugai H, Ohtaki S, Ishiyama J, Ishikawa Y (1995) The management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era and our strategy. (in Japanese with English abstract). Tando (J Jpr Biliary Assoc) 9:306–311

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka M, Sada M, Eguchi T, Konomi H, Naritomi G, Takeda T, Ogawa Y, Chijiiwa K, Deenitchin GP (1996) Comparison of routine and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 20:267–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Isaji, S., Murabayashi, K., Hayashi, M. et al. Management of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus open surgery. J Hep Bil Pancr Surg 3, 452–456 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349791

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02349791

Key words

Navigation