Abstract
Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the importance of invasion beyond the basement membrane on overall survival in Fallopian tube carcinoma and its influence on the necessity of postoperative adjuvant therapy (stage 0 vs. stage I).Design: In a nationwide analysis the data of 51 patients were evaluated. The participating departments provided the study center with histologic specimens. A re-staging was done according to the FIGO-classification for Fallopian tube carcinomas. Stage 0 patients received no further postoperative therapy, in stage I patients were devided in 2 groups to evaluate the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy vs. irradiation).Results: Patients of stage 0 had a significantly better prognosis than patients of stage I (p=0.035). Stage I patients treated by irradiation showed a significantly better prognosis than patients treated by chemotherapy (p=0.017).Conclusion: Tumour penetration through the basement membrane causes prognosis to deteriorate significantly (5-year survival rate about 50% in stage I). Postoperative therapy is thus indicated with stage I disease. Irradiation seems to give better results than chemotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benedet JL, White GW, Fairey RN, Boyes DA (1977) Adenocarcinoma of the Fallopian tube-experience with 42 patients. Obstet Gynecol 50: 654–657
Denham JW, Mac Lennan KA (1984) The management of primary carcinoma of the Fallopian tube-experience of 40 cases. Cancer 53: 166–172
Dodson JW, Ford JH, Averette HE (1970) Clinical aspects of Fallopian tube carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 36: 935–939
Engeler V, Reinisch E, Schreiner WE (1981) Das primäre Tubenkarzinom — eine klinische Studie an 37 Patientinnen. Geburth Frauenheilk 41: 325–329
Frick II HC (1978) Cancer of the Fallopian tube. In: Gusberg SB, Frick HC (eds) Corscadens Gynecol Cancer 5th edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 368–374
Hu CY, Taymor ML, Hertig AT (1950) Primary carcinoma of the Fallopian tube. Am J Obstet Gynecol 59: 58–67
Kone M, Body G, Calais G, Fignon A, Fetissof F, Lansac J (1992) Adenocarcinoma primitif de la trompe. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 21: 187–192
McMurray EH, Jacobs AJ, Perez CA, Camel HM, Kao M, Galekatos A (1986) Carcinoma of the Fallopian tube-management and sites of failure. Cancer 58: 2070–2075
Morris M, Gershenson DM, Burke TW, Kavanagh JJ, Silva EG, Wharton JT (1990) Treatment of the Fallopian tube carcinoma with cisplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamid. Obstet Gynecol 76: 1020–1023
Pakisch B, Poschauko J, Stücklschweiger G, Poier E, Lahousen M, Pickel H et al. (1990) Die Behandlung des primären Karzinoms der Tuba Fallopii. Geburth Frauenheilk 50: 593–596
Pfeiffer P, Mogensen H, Amtrup F, Honore E (1989) Primary carcinoma of the Fallopian tube. Acta Oncol 28: 7–11
Phelps HM Chapman KE (1973) Role of radiation therapy in treatment of primary carcinoma of the uterine tube. Obstet Gynecol 43: 669–673
Schiller HM, Silverberg SG (1971) Staging and prognosis in primary carcinoma of the Fallopian tube. Cancer 28: 389–395
Schray MF, Podratz KC, Malkasian GD (1987) Fallopian tube cancer: The role of radiation therapy. Radiotherapy Oncol 10: 267–275
Tamini HK, Figge DC (1981) Adenocarcinoma of the uterine tube: potential for lymph node metastasis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 141: 132–137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Members of the Study Group: G. Alpi, Ch. Altmutter, G. Bartussek, M. Bayr, H. Becker, B. Bibus, A. Bichler, K. Czerwenka, H. P. Dinges, W. Feigl, A. Fink, F. Friedrich, F. Fuith, E. Georgiades, H. Gogl, W. Grünberger, A. Hackl, K. Kahn, S. Karasegh, A. Kerak, D. Kosak, H. Krahuletz, A. Kratochwil, J. Kremser, L. Leodolter, E. Machacek, H. Mayer, M. Medl, S. Naude, H. Nemec, R. Pavelka, W. Pflanzl, H. Salzer, E. Schenk, A. Schröck, A. Seidl, M. Stiglbauer, W. Stiglbauer, St. Szalay, R. Taschner, J. Tscharf, A. Wellenhofer, W. Winfried, N. Wirrani, G. Wolfram.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, M., Rosen, A., Graf, A. et al. Primary Fallopian tube carcinoma — a retrospective survey of 51 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 255, 141–146 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390941
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02390941