Summary
Histomorphometric evaluation of bone formation in an intravital tetracycline-labeled skeleton of a suddenly deceased osteoporotic woman is presented. The 24 skeletal sites investigated displayed substantial regional variations which, for two out of four cortical bone dynamics and all trabecular bone dynamics, were significantly higher than the intraspecimen variation. Poor agreement was found between bone formation in left- and right-sided iliac crest specimens. Furthermore, no agreement was found between trabecular bone formation and amount of hematopoetic marrow. With all the limitations that the study of a single patient involves it is suggested that (1) bone biopsy in individual patients should not be the only basis for therapeutic decisions in postmenopausal osteoporosis; (2) amount of hematopoietic marrow does not seem to influence bone formation; and (3) bone formation in the skeleton display large regional variations, which are larger for the fraction of labeled surfaces than for appositional rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Frost HM (1983) Bone histomorphometry: choice of marking agent and labeling schedule. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. pp 37–52
Rao DS (1983) Practical approach to bone biopsy. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRS Press, pp 3–12
Villanueva AR (1974) A bone stain for osteoid seams in fresh unembedded mineralized bone. Stain Technol 49:1–8
Delling G, Luehmann H, Baron R, Mathews CHE, Olah A (1980) Investigation of intra- and inter-reader reproducibility. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry. Third International Workshop pp 419–427
Visser WJ, Roelofs JMM, Peters JPJ, Lentferink MHF, Duursma SA (1980) Sampling variations in bone histomorphometry. In: Jee WSS, Parfitt AM (eds) Bone histomorphometry. Third International Workshop pp 429–434
Compston JE, Vedi S, Stellon AJ (1986) Interobserver and intraobserver variation in bone histomorphometry. Calcif Tissue Int 30:67–70
Melsen F, Melsen B, Mosekilde L (1978) An evaluation of the quantitative parameters applied in bone histology. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 86:63–69
De Vernejoul MC, Kuntz D, Miravet L, Goutallier D, Rychewaert A (1981) Bone histomorphometric reproducibility in normal patients. Calcif Tissue Int 33:369–374
Malluche HH, Meger W, Sherman D, Massry SG (1982) Quantitative bone histology in 84 normal American subjects: micromorphometric analysis and evaluation of variance in iliac bone. Calcif Tissue Int 34:449–455
Whyte MP, Bergfeld MA, Murphy WA, Avioli LV, Teitelbaum SL (1982) Postmenopausal osteoporosis. A heterogenous disorder as assessed by histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone from untreated patients. Am J Med 72:193–201
Meunier PJ, Sellami S, Briancon D, Edouard C (1981) Histological heterogeneity of apparently idiopathic osteoporosis. In: DeLuca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS, Johnston CC, Parfitt AM (eds) Osteoporosis. Recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 293–302
Meunier P, Aaron J, Edouard C, Vignon C (1971) Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. Clin Orthop 80:147–154
Heaney RP, Recker RR, Saville PD (1978) Menopausal changes in bone remodelling. J Lab Clin Med 92:964–970
Nordin BEC, Aaron J, Speed R, Crilly RG (1981) Bone formation and resorption as the determinants of trabecular bone volume in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet ii:277–279
Parfitt AM, Mathews C, Rao D, Frame B, Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR (1981) Impaired osteoblast function in metabolic bone disease. In: Osteoporosis: recent advances in pathogenesis and treatment. DeLuca HF, Frost HM, Jee WSS, Johnston CC, Parfitt AM (eds) University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 321–330
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pødenphant, J., Engel, U. Regional variations in histomorphometric bone dynamics from the skeleton of an osteoporotic woman. Calcif Tissue Int 40, 184–188 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556619
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556619