Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in study design, gender issues, and other characteristics of clinical research published in three major medical journals from 1971 to 1991

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in study design and other characteristics of original research published inJAMA, Lancet, and theNew England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) between 1971 and 1991.

DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study of original clinical research published inJAMA, Lancet, andNEJM during 1971, 1981, and 1991.

MEASUREMENTS: Four hundred forty-four articles were independently reviewed by at least two investigators and classified according to study design and other preselected study characteristics. Changes over time were analyzed by chi-square tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables.

MAIN RESULTS: Clinical results doubled, from 17% of all articles in 1971 to 35% in 1991 (p<0.004), while case series decreased from 30% to 4% (p<0.0001). Of 118 clinical trials, randomized controlled trials increased from 31% to 76% (p<0.003) and nonrandomized controlled trials decreased from 42% to 8% (p<0.002). Multicenter studies increased from 10% to 39% (p<0.0001) and the prevalence of health services research increased from none in 1971 to 12% in 1991 (p<0.001). The proportion of the studies explicitly excluding women from the subject population decreased from 11% in 1971 to 3% in 1991 (p<0.03). In 1991 7% of the studies were composed entirely of men subjects, while only 0.7% of the studies were specific to men’s health. Twelve percent of the studies in 1991 were specific to women’s health. Between 1971 and 1991 there was no change in the prevalence of women first authors or studies addressing women’s or minorities’ health issues.

CONCLUSIONS: Several important changes in clinical research studies published inJAMA, Lancet, andNEJM have taken place between 1971 and 1991. Clinical trials have increased in frequency, largely replacing studies containing ten or fewer subjects. Health services research has increased in prevalence, reflecting growing interest in studies addressing the delivery of health care. Our data support the hypothesis that exclusion of women from clinical research studies is an important contributor to the paucity of data concerning women’s health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fletcher RH, Fletcher SW. Clinical research in general medical journals. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:180–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Healy B. The Yentl syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:274–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Angell M. Caring for women’s health—what is the problem? N Engl J Med. 1993;329:271–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett JC. Inclusion of women in clinical trials—policies for population subgroups. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:288–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Merkatz RB, Temple R, Sobel S, et al. Women in clinical trials of new drugs—a change in Food and Drug Administration policy. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:292–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wenger NK, Speroff L, Packard B. Cardiovascular health and disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:247–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fowkes FGR, Garraway WM, Sheehy CK. Practice in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991;45:102–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reich J, Black DW, Jarjous D. Architecture of research in psychiatry. 1953 to 1983. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44:311–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayden GF, Saulsbury FT. A review of theJournal of Pediatrics: the first fifty years. J Pediatr. 1982;101:5–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvarez-Dardet C, Gascon E, Mur P, Nolasco A. 10-year trends in the journal’s publications. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:1521–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenfeld R. Clinical research in otolaryngology journals. Arch Oto-laryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:164–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burman K. Hanging from the masthead: reflections on authorship. Ann Intern Med. 1982;90:602–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friesinger GC. Who should be an author? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:1240–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fye WB. Medical authorship: traditions, trends, and tribulations. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:317–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Angell M. Publish or perish: a proposal. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:261–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDermott, M.M., Lefevre, F., Feinglass, J. et al. Changes in study design, gender issues, and other characteristics of clinical research published in three major medical journals from 1971 to 1991. J Gen Intern Med 10, 13–18 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599570

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599570

Key words

Navigation