Skip to main content
Log in

Malpractice

A case-control study of claimants

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Efforts by hospitals to minimize the frequency of malpractice claims require knowledge of which patients file claims and why. Utilizing a case-control method to investigate the characteristics of patients, of providers, and of the course of care at a university hospital, the authors found several factors to be associated with notification of an intent to file a claim. White collar workers, patients dissatisfied with their care, those who experienced more complications, and those admitted to a particular medical floor were more likely to make a claim. There was no significant association between notice of a claim and complexity of care as indicated by number of diagnoses, invasive procedures, blood tests, and x-rays. Furthermore, the number of different primary care physicians and different consultants did not influence the patient’s decision to pursue legal action. Attention to these findings may help avert malpractice claims; however, further study with a larger sample is needed to validate these results

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ritchey FJ. Physician’s perceptions of the suit-prone patient. Hum Org. 1979;38:160.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ritchey FJ. Case management of patients perceived as suit prone. Ethics Sci Med. 1980;7:37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weaver E. Letter to the editor. JAMA. 1988;259:2236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Doherty EG, Haven CO. Medical malpractice and negligence, socio-demographic characteristics of claimants and nonclaimants. JAMA. 1977;238:1656.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rudov MH, Myers TI, Mirabella A. Medical malpractice insurance claims files closed in 1970. Report of the Secretary’s Commission on Medical Malpractice, Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973;1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Woolley FR, Kane RL, Hughes CC, Wright DD. The effect of doctor-patient communication on satisfaction and outcome of care. Soc Sci Med. 1978;12:123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gau D, Gau G. Patient satisfaction, J Coll Gen Pract. 1986;(May)36:226.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spendlove DC, Rigdon MA, Jensen WN, Udall KS. Effects of waiting on patient mood and satisfaction. J Fam Pract. 1987;24:200.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elnicki RA, Schmitt JP. Contribution of patient and hospital characteristics to adverse patient incidents. Health Serv Res. 1980;15:397.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Steel K, Gertman PM, Crescenzi C, Anderson J. Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital, N Engl J Med. 1981;304:638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Medical malpractice, no agreement on the problems or solutions. GAO Publication HRD-85-50. Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office, 1986.

  12. Press I. The predisposition to file claims: the patient’s perspective. Law Med Health Care. 1984;12:53.

    Google Scholar 

  13. LoGerfo JP. Medical malpractice (letter to the editor). JAMA. 1979;241:1793.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Department of Medicine and the Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, State University of New York, Stony Brook, New York.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, R.H., Williams, P.C., Napolitana, G. et al. Malpractice. J Gen Intern Med 5, 244–248 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600543

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600543

Key words

Navigation