Abstract
Awareness of the internal phonological structure of words is a causal factor in success with the alphabetic principle in word recognition. However, findings with the Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization (LAC) Test reveal 25–30% of the population show deficiency in a subtle component of phonological awareness termed comparator function. We argue that this comparator function—an ability to hold the phoneme and/or syllable segments of two phonological structures in mind and compare and represent any variations in the number, identity, or order of their segments—is a primary sensory-cognitive function underlying the secondary function of self-correction in word recognition and spelling. And since word recognition correlates highly with comprehension, comparator function also indirectly impacts this basic purpose for reading. We suggest that the needs of many individuals, including educators themselves, for development and refinement of phonological awareness/comparator function may be misdiagnosed and underaddressed unless more sensitive measures of phonological awareness are used. The consequence of inadequate assessment/remediation of these deficiencies in educators is that they may be less able to assess and address these deficiencies in their students. Standard phonics instruction is known to be ineffective in developing phonological awareness for many individuals. However, phonological deficits can be addressed both preventively and remedially using procedures that are fundamentally different from typical phonics instruction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, A., Andersen, H., Heilman, P., Voeller, K., and Torgesen, J. 1991. Phonological awareness training and remediation of analytic decoding deficits in a group of severe dyslexics.Annals of Dyslexia 41:193–206.
Bell, N. 1991. Gestalt imagery: A critical factor in language comprehension.Annals of Dyslexia 41:246–259.
Bower, G. H. and Morrow, D. G. 1990. Mental models in narrative comprehension.Science: Jan:44–48.
Berninger, V. W., Thalberg, S. T., DeBruyn, I., and Smith, R. 1987. Preventing reading disabilities by assessing and remediating phonemic skills.School Psychology Review 16:554–565.
Bradley, L. and Bryant, P. E. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read—a causal connection.Nature 301:419–21.
Byrne, B. and Ledez, J. 1983. Phonological awareness in reading disabled adults.Australian Journal of Psychology 35:185–97.
Calfee, R., Lindamood, C., and Lindamood, P. 1973. Acoustic-phonetic skills and reading—kindergarten through twelfth grade.Journal of Educational Psychology 64:293–298.
Carroll, J. and Austin, M. 1957. Underachievement in reading: A study of its extent and causes in the public schools of Newton, Massachusetts. Unpublished research. Laboratory for Research in Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Cooper, F. 1972. How is language conveyed by speech?In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly (eds.).Language by Ear and by Eye: The relationships between speech and reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ehri, L. and Sweet, J. 1991. Finger-point reading of memorized text: What enables beginners to process the print?Reading Research Quarterly 26:442–462.
Felton, R., Naylor, C., and Wood, F. 1990. Neuropsychological profiles of adult dyslexics.Brain and Language 39:485–497.
Howard, M. 1982. Utilizing oral-motor feedback in auditory conceptualization.Journal of Educational Neuropsychology 2:24–35.
Howard, M. 1986. Effects of pre-reading training in auditory conceptualization on subsequent reading achievement. Doctoral Dissertation, Brigham Young University.
Karlsen, B., Madden, R., and Gardner, E. 1976.Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test—Red Level. Manual for administering and interpreting. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Kavanagh, I. and Mattingly, J. 1972.Language by Ear and by Eye: The relationship between speech and reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewkowicz, N. 1980. Phonemic awareness training: What to teach and how to teach it.Journal of Education Psychology 72:686–700.
Liberman, I. 1987. Language and literacy: The obligation of the schools of education.In W. Ellis (ed.).Intimacy with Language: A forgotten basic in teacher education. Baltimore: The Orton Dyslexia Society.
Liberman, I. and Shankweiler, D. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write.Remedial and Special Education 6:8–17.
Liberman, I., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F., and Carter, B. 1974. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 18:201–12.
Liberman, I., Shankweiler, D., and Liberman, A. M. 1989. The alphabetic principle and learning to read.In D. Shankweiler and I. Liberman (eds.).Phonology and Reading Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lie, A. 1991. Effects of a training program for stimulating skills in word analysis in first-grade children.Reading Research Quarterly 26:234–250.
Lindamood, C. 1975. The incidence of auditory conceptual dysfunction among teachers of reading and language arts. Paper presented at the National Council for Research in English. Washington, D.C.
Lindamood, C. and Lindamood, P. 1975.The A.D.D. Program: Auditory Discrimination in Depth. 2d ed. Allen, TX: DLM, Inc.
Lindamood, C. and Lindamood, P. 1979. Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. 2d ed. Allen, TX: DLM, Inc.
Lindamood, P. 1990. Unpublished data from University of Idaho School of Education study.
Long, S. A., Winograd, P. N., and Bridge, C. A. 1989. The effects of reader and text characteristics on reports of imagery during and after reading.Reading Research Quarterly 19:353–372.
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., and Wall, S. 1980. Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 21:159–173.
Mann, V. 1986. Why some children encounter reading problems: The contribution of difficulties with language processing and phonological sophistication to early reading disability.In J. K. Torgesen and B. Y. Wong (eds.).Psychological and Educational Perspectives on Learning Disabilities. New York: Academic Press.
Marcel, A. 1980. Phonological awareness and phonological representation: Investigation of a specific spelling problem.In U. Frith (ed.).Cognitive Processes in Spelling. London: Academic Press.
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., and Bertelson, P. 1979. Does awareness of speech arise spontaneously?Cognition 7:323–31.
Oliver, M. E. 1982. Improving comprehension with mental imagery. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Washington Organization for Reading Development of the International Reading Association, Seattle, Washington, March 1982.
Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., and Fulker, D. 1989. Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences.Journal of Learning Disabilities 226:339–348.
O’Neil, W. 1972. Our collective phonological illusions: young and old.In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly (eds.).Language by Ear and by Eye: The relationships between speech and reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Perfetti, C. 1985.Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pratt, A. and Brady, S. 1988. The relationship of phonological awareness to reading disability in children and adults.Journal of Educational Psychology 80:319–323.
Pribram, K. 1971.Languages of the Brain: Experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology. New York: Brandon House, Inc.
Rockford Area Literacy Council. 1990. Rockford, IL. Unpublished research.
Rosner, J. and Simon, D. 1971. The auditory analysis test: An initial report.Journal of Learning Disabilities 4:384–392.
Roth, S. and Beck, I. 1987. Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs.Reading Research Quarterly 22:197–218.
Shankweiler, D. and Liberman, I. 1972. Misreading: a search for causes.In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly (eds.).Language by Ear and by Eye: The relationships between speech and reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shankweiler, D. and Liberman, I. (eds.). 1989.Phonology and Reading Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Shannon, M. 1959. The measurement of phonetic understandings relevant to the teaching of reading. Doctoral Dissertation, Harvard University.
Sheffield, B. 1991. The structured flexibility of Orton-Gillingham.Annals of Dyslexia 41:41–54.
Stanovich, K., Cunningham, A., and Cramer, B. 1984. Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38:175–190.
Stanovich, K., Cunningham, A., and Feeman, D. 1984. Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress.Reading Research 19:278–301.
Thatcher, R. 1980. Personal Communication. Unpublished research. Applied Neuroscience Laboratories, University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Torgesen, J. and Morgan, S. In press. The effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children.Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Wepman, J. 1960. Auditory discrimination, speech and reading.Elementary School Journal 60:325–333.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindamood, P.C., Bell, N. & Lindamood, P. Issues in phonological awareness assessment. Annals of Dyslexia 42, 242–259 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654948
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02654948