Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At Time 1, 171 students were administered questionnaires for measuring sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI), trait anger, anger in, anger out, anger control, self-assertiveness, and attitudes toward principles of distributive justice (equality of chances, equity). Two months later (Time 2), 75 of these subjects were treated unfairly in a laboratory situation dealing with competition and achievement behavior. Two justice principles were violated: the equality of chances principle and the equity principle. Four weeks later (Time 3), 32 subjects evaluated the unfair treatment in retrospect. All three occasions were presented as independent studies with the subjects perceiving no connection between them. In line with our hypotheses, we found that immediate and delayed reactions to the unjust treatments depended to a considerable degree on SBI. For example, the combined score of the SBI questionnaire predicted, with a beta weight of .71, a combined rating of three experts who used various sources of objective information (e.g., tape-recorded interactions between subject and experimenter) to estimate the degree to which the subject displayed emotional, verbal, and behavioral resentment against the unfair treatment. At the same time, measures for other constructs (e.g., assertiveness, trait anger, anger expression), which can also be linked theoretically to the criteria, explained either none or a much smaller proportion of variance in reactions to unjust treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. S., and West, S. G. (1991).Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors.Multivar. Behav. Res. 1: 245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar, Y., and Resh, N. (1993).Exploring the multi-dimensional structure of sense of deprivation: The case of Israeli junior high school students. Paper presented at the IVth International Conference on Social Justice in Trier.

  • Hassebrauck, M. (1993).Development of a scale to measure sensitivity toward inequity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., and Miles, E. W. (1985). Test for individual perceptions of job equity: Some preliminary findings.Percept. Motor Skills 61: 1055–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovas, L. (1995). Nespravodlivost v interpersonalnych vztahoch [Injustice in interpersonal relations].Ceskoslovenska Psychol. 34: 203–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovas, L., and Pirhacova, I. (1996). Anxieta, hnevlivost a senzitivita voci nespravodlivosti [Anxiety, anger, and sensitivity to injustice].Ceskoslovenska Psychol. 40: 248–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., and Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences in justice behavior. In Greenberg, J., and Cohen, R. L. (eds.),Equity and Justice and Social Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 43–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1993). The experience of injustice. In Stroebe, W. and Hewstone, M. (eds.),European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 4, Wiley, Chichester, U.K., pp. 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohiyeddini, C. (1995).Sensibilität für widerfahrene Ungerechtigkeit als Disposition: kognitive, emotionale sowie behaviorale Reaktionen auf ungerechte Behandlung. Unpublished diploma thesis, Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., Dalbert, C., Reichle, B., and Schmitt, M. (1986). Urteile über Gerechtigkeit, “existentielle Schuld” und Strategien der Schuldabwehr. In Oser, F., Althof, W. and Garz, D. (eds.),Moralische Zugänge zum Menschen—Zugänge zum moralischen Menschen, Kindt, München, Germany, pp. 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., Dalbert, C., and Schneider, A. (1990).Coping mit Problemen sozial schwacher Menschen. Ergebnisse der Längsschnittuntersuchung (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 53), Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1983).Existentielle Schuld: Rekrutierung der Untersuchungsstichprobe, Erhebungsinstrumente und Untersuchungsplan (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 20), Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., Schmitt, M., and Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one’s own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In Bierhoff, H.-W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.),Justice in Social Relations, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montada, L., and Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged.Soc. Justice Res. 3: 313–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nechvatal, A. (in press).Gerechtigkeitssensibilität aus der Beobachterperspektive. Unpublished diploma thesis, Trier University, Trier, Germany.

  • Schmitt, M., Behner, R., Müller, L., and Montada, L. (1992).Werte, existentielle Schuld und Hilfsbereitschaft gegenüber Indios und landlosen Bauern in Paraguay (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 68, Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., and Dörfel, M. (1996).Effects of justice sensitivity and procedural injustice in the workplace on job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 103). Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Maes, J., and Schmal, A. (1995).Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Einstellungen zu Verteilungsprinzipien, Ungerechtigkeitssensibität und Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Kovariate (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 82), Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Maes, J., and Schmal, A. (in press).Gerechtigkeit als innerdeutsches Problem: Analyse der Messeigenschaften von Messinstrumenten für Einstellungen zu Verteilungsprinzipien, Ungerechtigkeitssensibität und Glaube an eine gerechte Welt (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” No. 104), Trier University, Trier, Germany.

  • Schmitt, M., and Mohiyeddini, C. (1996). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage.Soc. Justice Res. 9: 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Neumann, R., and Montada, L. (1992).Sensitivity to experienced injustice: Structural equation measurement and validation models (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 67), Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Neumann, R., and Montada, L. (1995). Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice.Soc. Justice Res. 8: 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., Meissner, A., Montada, L., & Reichle, B. (1987).Validierung von Selbsberichten über Fremdratings (Berichte aus der Arbeitsgruppe “Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral” Nr. 41), Trier University, Trier, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenkmezger, P., Hodapp, V. (1989). Das State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI): Itemmetrische und faktorenanalytische Befunde und Untersuchungen zur Konstruktvalidität.Trierer Psychol. Berichte 16 (Heft 1).

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1988).State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. Research Edition, PAR, Odessa, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyer, R., Ferring, D., and Schmitt, M. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment.Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 2: 79–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich de Muynck, R., and Ullrich, R. (1976).Assertiveness-Training-Programm ATP, Pfeiffer, München, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohiyeddini, C., Schmitt, M.J. Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation. Soc Just Res 10, 333–353 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683307

Key words

Navigation