Skip to main content
Log in

Pathologic assessment of surgical margins on frozen and permanent sections in breast conserving surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The diagnostic value of frozen section was evaluated in the histologic assessment of surgical margins obtained by wide excision of breast tumors. There were 87 patients with unilateral breast cancer, and 5 with bilateral breast cancers. The periphery of the excised breast tissue was peeled like an orange and histologically examined by frozen and permanent section. If eitherin situ or infiltrating microscopic tumor was found at the margin, it was considered positive. Using frozen sections, the margin was judged histologically positive or suspicious in 30 tumors (31%) and negative in 67 (69%) tumors. Positive surgical margins were histologically confirmed by permanent section in 20 (67%) of the 30 tumors diagnosed as positive or suspicious on frozen section. Another 10 tumors had negative margins. In 4 tumors, however, while the initial or re-excised margin was negative on frozen section, the margins were positive by permanent section. These surgical margins were positive due exclusively to the presence of ductal carcinomain situ (DCIS). Evaluation of surgical margins in breast cancer by frozen section, thus exhibited a diagnostic accuracy of 86%, a sensitivity of 83%, and a specificity of 86%. It is concluded that frozen sections are useful in the determination of involvement of surgical margins after the wide excision of breast cancer. It must be pointed out that frozen sections will often overestimate involvement of the surgical margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BCT:

Breast conserving therapy

DCIS:

Ductal carcinomain situ

LDM:

Latissimus dorsi muscle

References

  1. Veronesi U, Banfi A, del Becchio M,et al. Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer; Long-term results.Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 22:1085–1089, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R,et al: Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.N Engl J Med 320:822–828, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkins PL, May VE, Hughes LE: Psychological morbidity associated with local recurrence of breast cancer.Int J Psychiatry Med 21:149–155, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Veronesi U, Volterrani F, Luini A,et al. Quadrantectomy versus lumpectomy for small size breast cancer.Eur J Cancer 26:671–673, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurtz JM, Jacquemier J, Amalric R,et al. Risk factors for breast recurrence in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients with ductal cancers treated by conservation therapy.Cancer 65:1867–1878, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghossein NA, Alpert S, Barba J,et al. Importance of adequate surgical excision prior to radiotherapy in the local control of breast cancer in patients treated conservatively.Arch Surg 127:411–415, 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher ER, Saas R, Fisher B,et al. Pathologic findings from the National Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6), II ; Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity.Cancer 57:1717–1724, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carter D: Margins of “lumpectomy” for breast cancer.Hum Pathol 17:330–332, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Macmillan RD, Purushotham AD, Mallon E,et al: Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer.Br J Surg 81:56–58, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frazier TG, Wong RWY, Rose D: Implications of accurate pathological margins in the treatment of primary breast cancer.Arch Surg 124:37–38, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Solin LJ, Fowble BL, Schultz DJ,et al. The significance of the pathology margins of the tumor excision on the outcome of patients treated with definitive irradiation for early stage breast cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:279–287, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer: Breast (ICD-0 174). In: Harmer MH ed, TMN Classification of Malignant Tumours, 4th ed, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp93–99, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Japan Breast Cancer Society: The general rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer.Jpn J Surg 19(5):612–632, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. The World Health Organization: The World Health Organization histological typing of breast tumors; Second edition.Am J Clin Pathol 78:806–816, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Veronesi U, Costa A: The role of surgery in the management of primary breast cancer. In: Baum M ed, Clinics in Oncology 1(3), WB Saunders, London, pp853–873, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noguchi M, Taniya T, Miyazaki I,et al. Immediate transposition of a latissimus dorsi muscle for correcting a quadrantectomy breast deformity in Japanese patients.Int Surg 75:166–170, 1990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Noguchi M, Saito Y, Mizukami Y,et al: Breast deformity; Its correction, and assessment of breast conserving surgery.Breast Cancer Res Treat 18:111–118, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Noguchi M, Saito Y, Taniya T,et al. Wide resection with latissimus dorsi muscle transposition in breast conserving surgery.Surg Oncol 1:231–236, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zafrani B, Vielh P, Fourguet A,et al. Conservative treatment of early breast cancer; Prognostic value of the ductalin situ component and other pathological variables on local control and survival; Long-term results.Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25:1645–1650, 1989.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schniit SJ, Connolly JR, Harris JR,et al. Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in stage I and II breast cancer treated by primary radiation therapy.Cancer 53:1049–1057, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallager HS, Martin JE: Early phases in the development of breast cancer.Cancer 24:1170–1178, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosen PP, Fracchia AA, Urban JA,et al. Residual mammary cancer following simulated partial mastectomy.Cancer 35:739–747, 1975.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M,et al. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas; Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery.Cancer 56:979–990, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holland R, Connolly JL, Gelman R,et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast.J Clin Oncol 8: 113–118, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B,et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6); Intraductal carcinoma (DICS).Cancer 57: 197–208, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Balch CM, Singletary SE, Bland KI: Clinical decision-making in early breast cancer.Ann Surg 217:207–225, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris JR, Recht A, Schnitt S,et al. Current status of conservative surgery and radiotherapy as primary local treatment for early carcinoma of the breast.Breast Cancer Res Treat 5:245–255, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vicini FA, Eberlein TJ, Connolly JL,et al. The optimal extent of resection for patients with stages I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy.Ann Surg 214:200–204, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Noguchi M: Comment; Breast-conserving surgery and tumour bed positivity in patients with breast cancer.Br J Surg 81:1829, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rilke F: Histopathology. In: Veronesi U ed, Bailliere’s Clinical Oncology 2(1), Bailliere Tindall, London, pp59–83, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fisher ER: The pathology of breast cancer as it relates to its evolution, prognosis and treatment. In: Baum M ed, Clinics in Oncology 1(3), WB Saunders, London, pp703–734, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fletcher GH: Clinical dose of response curves of human malignant epithelial tumors.Br J Radiol 46:1 -12, 1973.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Fletcher GH: Subclinical disease.Cancer 53:1274–1284, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B,et al. Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer; Long-term results of a randomized trial.Eur J Cancer 26:668–670, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Veronesi U, Luini A, Vecchio MD,et al. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast.N Engl J Med 328:1587–1591, 1993.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Noguchi, M., Minami, M., Earashi, M. et al. Pathologic assessment of surgical margins on frozen and permanent sections in breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer 2, 27–33 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966893

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02966893

Key words

Navigation