Skip to main content
Log in

Establishing systems of care in Germany: A long and winding road

  • Systems of Care in Selected Countries
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since 1995/1996 a long-term care insurance (LTCI), which promised to develop new support structures, in particular for the group of potentially frail elderly people, has been implemented in Germany. It will be shown that this LTCI has undoubtedly improved the social situation of the persons in need of care, even if its scheme is only providing basic support with a ceiling in cash-benefits and benefits in-kind, and privileging home care by informal caregivers. But certain misdevelopments in the LTCI have shown that the present scheme requires further effort to cope with these negative effects and to elaborate new integrated models of care that bridge the still existent gap between medical and social support. This article points to long traditions of separating the social and medical dimensions in Germany which have also resulted in divided institutional arrangements. The current scheme of the LTCI, its organizational principles and its entitlements and benefits are outlined, which gives the opportunity to point out certain deficiencies, e.g., the still inappropriate provision for dementia care which is due to the dominant IADL-orientation of the medical assessment procedure and its implicit negligence of social care elements. The public debate about necessary improvements in benefits for the demented aged has already led to slight revisions of the LTCI, and will develop into a more comprehensive movement to path-bridging models of social and medical care in which the quality dimension will play a decisive role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evers A. The new long-term care insurance program in Germany. J Aging Soc Policy 1998; 10: 77–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schunk M. The social insurance model of care for older people in Germany. In Glendinning G, Ed. Rights and realities. Comparing new developments in long-term care for older people. Bristol: Polity Press, 1998: 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider U. Germany’s social long-term care insurance: Design, implementation and evaluation. International Social Security Review 1999; 52: 31–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brodsky J, Habib J, Mizrahi I. Long-term care laws in five developed countries. A review. WHO Publication, Jerusalem: JDC, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Döhner H, Kofahl C. Chapter 3: Germany. In Philp I, Ed. Family care of older people in Europe. Amsterdam. Berlin. Oxford. Tokio, Washington DC: IOS Press, 2001: 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schneekloth U, Rosenbladt Bv, Piekara R, Potthoff P. Hilfe- und Pflegebedürftige in privaten Haushalten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schneekloth U, Müller U. Hilfe- und Pflegebedürftige in Heimen. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Statistisches Bundesamt: Kurzbericht: Pflegestatistik 1999. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt, 2001.

  9. Enquete Kommission Demographischer Wandel: Schlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission “Demographischer Wandel” — Herausforderungen unserer älter werdenden Gesellschaft an den Einzelnen und die Politik. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag (BT-Drucksache 14/8800), 2002.

  10. Schneekloth U, Müller U. Wirkungen der Pflegeversicherung. Band 127. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999.

  11. Sozialenquête: Soziale Sicherung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. 2 Volumes. Stuttgart. Berlin. Köln. Mainz: Kohlhammer. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alber J. The debate about long-term care reform in Germany. In Hennessy P. Ed. Caring for the frail elderly people: Social Policy Studies. Paris: OECD, 1996: 261–78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit: Zweiter Bericht über die Entwicklung der Pflegeversicherung. Deutscher Bundestag 14. Wahlperiode, Drucksache 14/1590. Bonn, Berlin 2001.

  14. Blinkert B, Klie T. Pflege im sozialen Wandel. Studie zur Situation häuslich versorgter Pflegebedürftiger. Hannover: Vincentz, 1999.

  15. Kardorff Ev, Kondratowitz HJv, Eds. Personalbemessung in der Altenhilfe. Regensburg: Transfer-Verlag, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Joachim von Kondratowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Kondratowitz, HJ., Tesch-Römer, C. & Motel-Klingebiel, A. Establishing systems of care in Germany: A long and winding road. Aging Clin Exp Res 14, 239–246 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324445

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324445

Key Words

Navigation