Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of preventive home visits for ambulatory housebound elders in Japan: a pilot study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Programs of preventive home visits for ambulatory housebound elders have not yet become established in Japan. The aim of this randomized pilot study was to investigate effects of such visits by public health nurses in Japan. Methods: A randomized controlled study with 18-month follow-up was conducted in a small Japanese agricultural town. Participants (n=119) were ambulatory housebound elders aged 65 and over, who were able to walk but who went outdoors less than three times a week at baseline survey. They were randomly assigned to intervention (n=59) or control group (n=60). Intervention group subjects received preventive home visits by public health nurses over 18 months (mean home visits=4.3). Control group subjects received usual primary and community care. Activities of daily living (ADLs), functional capacity, self-efficacy for daily activities, self-efficacy for health promotion, depression, and social support were collected via questionnaire at baseline and at the 18-month follow-up point. Results: At follow-up, 81.4% of intervention group subjects were still living at home vs 73.3% of control group subjects (NS). Simple group comparisons following repeated measures (ANCOVA) showed that the intervention group had higher ADL scores than the control group at follow-up (p=0.044). Conclusions: These pilot results suggest that home visits by public health nurses may be effective in helping to reduce ADL decline among ambulatory housebound elders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubenstein LZ, Aronow HU, Schloe M, et al. A home-based geriatric assessment, follow-up and health promotion program: Design, methods, and baseline findings from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Aging Clin Exp Res 1994; 6: 105–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pathy MSJ, Bayer A, Harding K, Dibbile A. Randomised trial of case finding and surveillance of elderly people at home. Lancet 1992; 340: 890–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Vass M, Avlund K, Hendriksen C, Anderson CK, Keiding N. Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark: methodology of a randomized controlled study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002; 14: 509–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stuck AE, Zuzahlen G, Neuenschhwander BE, Meyer Schweizer RA, Bauen G, Beck JC. Methodologic challenges of randomized controlled studies on in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment: the EIGER project. Aging Clin Exp Res 1995; 7: 218–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalby DM, Sellors JW, Fraser FD, Fraser C, van Ineveld C, Howard M. Effect of preventive home visits by a nurse on the outcomes of frail elderly people in the community: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 2000; 162: 497–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Rossum E, Frederiks CMA, Philipsen H, Portengen K, Wiskerke J, Knipschild P. Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people. BMJ 1993; 307: 27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernabei R, Landi F, Gambassi G, et al. Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. BMJ 1998; 316: 1348–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Newbury JW, Marley JE, Beilby JJ. A randomized controlled trial of the outcome of health assessment of people aged 75 years and over. Med J Aust 2001; 175: 104–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stuck AE, Egger M, Hammer A, Minder CE, Beck JC. Home visits to prevent nursing home admission and functional decline in elderly people: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2002; 287: 1022–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M, et al. Effectiveness of home based support for older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2001; 323: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, Adams J, Rubenstein LZ. Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993; 342: 1032–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganguli M, Fox A, Gilby J, Belle S. Characteristics of rural homebound older adults: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 363–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kono A, Kanagawa K. Characteristics of housebound elderly by mobility level in Japan. Nurs Health Sci 2001; 3: 105–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kono A, Kai I, Sakato C, Rubenstein LZ. Frequency of going outdoors: a predictor of functional and psychosocial change among ambulatory frail elders living at home. J Gerontol 2004; 59A: 275–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D, Bernabei R. Geriatric assessment technology: international research perspective. Aging Clin Exp Res 1995; 7: 157–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Landi F, Lattanzio F, Gambassi G, et al. A model for integrated home care of frail older patients: the Silver Network project. Aging Clin Exp Res 1999; 11: 262–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Department of Health Care, Matsudo City. Hokenhu niyoru hokenshido no netakiri yobokoka nikansuru kennkyu (Efficacy in functional decline of home visits by public health nurses). 1999 (in Japanese).

  18. Shakai Hoken Jitsumu Kenkyujyo. Shukanhoken-eiSci news (Weekly news of public health) 2000; 1081: 14–35 (in Japanese).

  19. Koyano W, Shibata H, Katsuji N, Nakazato K, Haga H, Suyama Y. Measurement of competence: reliability and validity of the TMIG index of competence. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1991; 13: 103–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hill KD. Schwarz JA. Kalogeropoulous JA. Gilbson JS. Fear of falling revised. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1025–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yokokawa Y, Kai I, Nakajima T. Development of a ‘self-efficacy for health promotion scale’ in community-dwelling elderly. Japan Journal of Public Health 1999; 46: 103–12 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheikh JI, Yesavage JA. Geriatric depression scale (GDS) recent evidence and development: a shorter version. Clin Gerontol 1986; 5: 165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Niino N, Imaizumi T, Kawakami N. A Japanese translation of the Geriatric Depression Scale. Clin Gerontol 1991; 10: 85–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Noguchi Y. Koreisha no sosharu sapoto (Social support for elders). Japanese Journal of Gerontology 1989; 34: 37–48 (in Japanese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hebert R, Robichaud L, Roy PM, Bravo G, Voyer L. Efficacy of a nurse-led multidimensional preventive programme for older people at risk of functional decline: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing 2001; 30: 147–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Haastregt JCM, Diederiks JPM, van Rossum E, de Witte LP, Crebolder HFJM. Effects of preventive home visits to elderly people living in the community: systematic review. BMJ 2000; 320: 754–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fabacher D, Josephson K, Pietruszca F, Linderborn K, Morley JE, Rubenstein LZ. An in-home preventive assessment program for independent older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 630–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stuck AE, Aronow HU, Steiner A, et al. A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1995; 1184–9.

  29. Stuck AE, Minder CE, Peter-Wuest I, et al. A randomized trial of in-home visits for disability prevention in community-dwelling older people at low and high risk for nursing home admission. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 977–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rubenstein LZ, Stuck AE. Preventive home visits for older people: defining criteria for success. Age Ageing 2001; 30: 107–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sepulveda VA GRECC, School of Medicine, UCLA, 16111 Plummer Street, Los Angeles, Sepulveda, CA, 91343, USA

    Ayumi Kono RN, PhD, Judith O. Harker & Laurence Z. Rubenstein

  2. Department of Social Gerontology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo

    Ichiro Kai

  3. Senior Citizens’ Welfare Section, Saku City Government Office, Nagano, Japan

    Chiyoko Sakato

Authors
  1. Ayumi Kono RN, PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ichiro Kai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chiyoko Sakato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Judith O. Harker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laurence Z. Rubenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayumi Kono RN, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kono, A., Kai, I., Sakato, C. et al. Effect of preventive home visits for ambulatory housebound elders in Japan: a pilot study. Aging Clin Exp Res 16, 293–299 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324554

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324554

Keywords

Search

Navigation