Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive stimulation intervention for elders with mild cognitive impairment compared with normal aged subjects: preliminary results

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Cognitive training programs have been developed for Alzheimer’s disease patients and the health]; elderly) population. Collective cognitive stimulation programs have been shown to be efficient for subjects with memory complaint. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of such cognitive programs in populations with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Methods: Twelve patients with MCI and twelve cognitively normal elders were administered a cognitive stimulation program. Cognitive performance (Logical Memory, Word paired associative learning task, Trail Making Test, verbal fluency test) were collected before and after the intervention. A gain score [(post-score — pre-score)/pre-score] was calculated for each variable and compared between groups. Results: The analysis revealed a larger intervention size effect in MCI than in normal elders’ performances on the associative learning task (immediate recall: p<0.05, delayed recall: p<0.01). The intervention was more beneficial in improving associative memory abilities in MCI than in normal subjects. At the end of the intervention, the MCI group had lower results than the normal group only for the delayed recall of Logical Memory. Conclusions: Although further studies are needed for more details on the impact of cognitive stimulation programs on MCI patients, this intervention is effective in compensating associative memory difficulties of these patients. Among non-pharmacological interventions, cognitive stimulation therapy is a repeatable and inexpensive collective method that can easily be provided to various populations with the aim of slowing down the rate of decline in elderly persons with cognitive impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, et al. Mild cognitive impairment — beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of an international working group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med 2004; 256: 240–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chong MS, Sahadevan S. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: diagnosis and prediction of progression. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 576–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman HH, Jacova C. Mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 13: 645–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manly JJ, Bell-McGinty S, Tang MX, Schupf N, Stern Y, Mayeux R. Implementing diagnostic criteria and estimating frequency of mild cognitive impairment in an urban community. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1739–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nordlund A, Rolstad S, Hellström P, Sjögren M, Hansen S, Wallin A. The Goteborg MCI study: mild cognitive impairment is a heterogeneous condition. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1485–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geslani DM, Tierney MC, Herrmann N., Szalai JP. Mild cognitive impairment: an operational definition and its conversion rate to Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2005; 19: 383–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amieva H, Letenneur L, Dartigues JF, et al. Annual rate and predictors of conversion to dementia in subjects presenting mild cognitive impairment criteria defined according to a population-based study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004; 18: 87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Luis CA, Loewenstein DA, Acevedo A, Barker WW, Duara R. Mild cognitive impairment. Directions for future research. Neurology 2003; 61: 438–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. De Rotrou J, Wenisch E, Chausson C, Dray F, Faucounau V, Rigaud AS. Accidental MCI in healthy subjects: a prospective longitudinal study. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12: 879–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Larrieu S, Letenneur L, Orgogozo JM, et al. Incidence and outcome of mild cognitive impairment: a population-based prospective cohort. Neurology 2002; 59: 1594–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirshner HS. Mild cognitive impairment: to treat or not to treat. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2005; 5: 455–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scherder EJ, Van Paasschen J, Deijen JB, et al. Physical activity and executive functions in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment. Aging Ment Health 2005; 9: 272–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rapp S, Brenes G, Marsh AP. Memory enhancement training for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary study. Aging Ment Health 2002; 6: 5–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ball K. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 2002; 288: 2271–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yesavage JA, Sheikh JI, Friedman L, Tanke E. Learning mnemonics: roles of aging and subtle cognitive impairment. Psychol Aging 1990; 5: 133–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Orrell M, Spector A, Thorgrimsen L, Woods B. A pilot study examining the effectiveness of Maintenance Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (MCST) for people with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 20: 446–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spector A, Thorgrimsen L, Woods B, et al. Efficacy of en evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2003; 183: 248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis RN, Massman PJ, Doody RS. Cognitive intervention in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomised placebo-controlled study. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2001; 15: 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Breuil V, De Rotrou J, Forette F, Tortrat D, Ganansia-Ganem A, Frambourt A. Cognitive stimulation of patients with dementia: preliminary results. Intern J Geriatr Psychiatry 1994; 9: 211–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olazarán J, Muñiz R, Reisberg B, et al. Benefits of cognitive-motor intervention in MCI and mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2004; 63: 2348–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson RS, Mendes de Leon CF, Barnes LL, et al. Participation in cognitively stimulating activities and risk of incident Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA 2002; 287: 742–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. De Rotrou J, Forette F, Tortrat D, et al. Cognitive efficiency profile, description and validation in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1991; 6: 501–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 1985–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale — Revised Third Edition: manual. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1997. Version française, 2001, Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reitan R. Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958; 8: 271–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cardebat D. Evocation lexicale formelle et sémantique chez des sujets normaux. Performances et dynamique de production en fonction de l’âge, du sexe et du niveau d’étude. Acta Neurol Belg 1990; 90: 207–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Goldberg D, Bridges K, Duncan-Jones P, Grayson D. Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings. BMJ 1988; 297: 897–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. De Jager C, Blackwell AD, Budge MM, Sahakian BJ. Predicting cognitive decline in healthy older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2005; 13: 735–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Collie A, Myers C, Schnirman G, Wood S, Maruff P. Selectivelyimpaired associative learning in older people with cognitive decline. J Cogn Neurosci 2002; 14: 488–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Femandez-Ballesteros R, Zamarron MD, Tarraga L. Learning potential: a new method for assessing cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr 2005; 17: 119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stern Y, Albert S, Tang MX, Tsai WY. Rate of memory decline in AD is related to education and occupation: cognitive reserve? Neurology 1999; 53: 1942–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Le Carret N, Lafont S, Mayo W, Fabrigoule C. The effect of education on cognitive performances and its implication for the constitution of the cognitive reserve. Dev Neuropsychol 2003; 23: 317–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scarmeas N, Stern Y. Cognitive reserve: implications for diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2004; 4: 374–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Le Carret N, Auriacombe S, Letenneur L, Bergua V, Dartigues JF, Fabrigoule C. Influence of education on the pattern of cognitive deterioration in AD patients: the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Brain Cogn 2005; 57: 120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sanchez JL, Rodriguez M, Carro J. Influence of cognitive reserve on neuropsychologic functioning in Alzheimer’s disease type sporadic in subjects of Spanish nationality. NeuropsychiatryNeuropsychol Behav Neurol 2002; 15: 113–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gerontology, Broca Hospital, 54-56 rue Pascal, 75013, Paris, France

    Emilie Wenisch, Inge Cantegreil-Kallen, Jocelyne De Rotrou, Pia Garrigue, Florence Moulin, Fériel Batouche, Aurore Richard, Martha De Sant’Anna & Anne Sophie Rigaud

Authors
  1. Emilie Wenisch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inge Cantegreil-Kallen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jocelyne De Rotrou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pia Garrigue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Florence Moulin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fériel Batouche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Aurore Richard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Martha De Sant’Anna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Anne Sophie Rigaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilie Wenisch.

Additional information

The present results were presented on a poster: “Wenisch E, Cantegreil-Kallen I, Giovannacci S, De Rotrou J, Moulin F, Batouche F, Rigaud A.S. (2005). Benefits of a cognitive stimulation program for subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment.” 18th Congress of the International Association of Gerontology. June 26–30, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenisch, E., Cantegreil-Kallen, I., De Rotrou, J. et al. Cognitive stimulation intervention for elders with mild cognitive impairment compared with normal aged subjects: preliminary results. Aging Clin Exp Res 19, 316–322 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324708

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324708

Keywords

Search

Navigation