Skip to main content
Log in

Near-Miss Effects on Response Latencies and Win Estimations of Slot Machine Players

  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined the degree to which slot machine near-miss trials, or trials that displayed 2 of 3 winning symbols on the payoff line, affected response times and win estimations of 12 recreational slot machine players. Participants played a commercial slot machine in a casino-like laboratory for course extra-credit points. Videotaped sessions were later coded to assess trial types and participant response latencies and win estimations for each participant. Results show that all 12 participants emitted verbalizations suggesting near-miss trials were of a higher approximation to a win than non-near-miss losing trials. Of the 12 participants 8 also demonstrated higher response latencies following losing trials than following winning trials. Variations across participants’ response latencies were attributed to the presence of and response to near miss trials. The implications of the near-miss on game preference, resistance to extinction, and the development of a behavioral treatment for pathological gamblers are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATOR, N. A. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Environmental determinants? The Behavior Analyst, 22, 93–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BARON, A. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Friend or foe? The Behavior Analyst, 22, 83–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • BLASZCZYNSKI, A. P., & MCCONAGHY, N. (1994). Criminal offenses in Gamblers Anonymous and hospital treated pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 99–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, R. I. F. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21, 1001–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BUJOLD, A., LADOUCEUR, R., SYLVAIN, C., & BOISVERT, J. M. (1994). Treatment of pathological gamblers: An experimental study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 275–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CROSBIE, J. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Useful friend. The Behavior Analyst, 22, 105–108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DELFABBRO, P. H., & WINEFIELD, A. H. (1999). Poker-machine gambling: Analysis of within-session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R. (2000). Manipulating the “Illusion of Control”: Variations in risk-taking as a function of perceived control over chance outcomes. The Psychological Record, 50, 705–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., HAYES, L J., & ZBAN, I. (2000). Examining the roles of rule following, reinforcement, and preexperimental histories on risk-taking behavior. The Psychological Record, 50, 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIXON, M. R., & SCHREIBER, J. (2002). Utilizing a computerized video poker simulation for the collection of experimental data on gambling behavior. The Psychological Record, 52, 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GHEZZI, P., LYONS, C., & DIXON, M. R. (2000). Gambling from a socioeconomic perspective. In W. K. Bickel & R. E. Vuchinich (Eds.), Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics. New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRIFFITHS, M. R. (1999). The psychology of the near-miss (revisited): A comment on Delfabbro & Winefield (1999). British Journal of Psychology, 90, 441–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HAYES, S. C. (1986). The case of the silent dog — verbal reports and the analysis of rules. A review of Ericsson and Simon’s Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 351–363.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HINELINE, R. N. (1977). Negative reinforcement and avoidance. In W. K Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTOR, J. R. (1924). Principles of psychology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • KNAPP, T. J. (1998). Behaviorism and public policy: B. F. Skinner’s views on gambling. Behavior and Social Issues, 7, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • LADOUCEUR, R., BOISVERT, J., PEPIN, M., LORANGER, M., & SYLVAIN, C. (1994). Social costs of pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 399–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LESIEUR, H. R., & BLUME, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (Sogs): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LYONS, C. A., & GHEZZI, P. M. (1995). Wagering on a large scale: Relationships between public gambling and game manipulations in two state lotteries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 127–137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MACE, F. C., & WACKER, D. P. (1994). Toward greater integration of basic and applied behavioral research: An introduction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 569–574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MACLIN, O. H., Dixon, M. R., & HAYES, L. J. (1999). A computerized slot machine simulation to investigate the variables involved in gambling behavior. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31(4), 731–735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MCGLYNN, R. D., & ROSE, M. P. (1998). Assessment of anxiety and fear. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Behavioral assessment. New York: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • MICHAEL, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminate and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • NATIONAL GAMBLING IMPACT STUDY COMMISSION (1999). Ngisc Final Report. Retrieved January 30, 2004, from http://www.ncfpc.org/specialngisc.html

    Google Scholar 

  • NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL. (1999, April 1). Pathological gambling: A critical review, p. Exec-2

    Google Scholar 

  • NEVADA STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD. (1997). Gaming revenue report (Vol. 4). Carson City, NY: Author.

  • PERONE, M. (1999). Statistical inference in behavior analysis: Experimental control is better. The Behavior Analyst, 22, 109–116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • PHILLIPS, D. P., WELTY, W. R., & SMITH, M. M. (1997). Elevated suicide levels associated with legalized gambling. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 27, 373–378.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • REID, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Behaviour, 2, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHREIBER, J., & DIXON, M. R. (2001). Temporal characteristics of behavior on random-ratio schedules observed during slot machine play. Psychological Reports, 89, 67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • STROMER, R. (2000). Integrating basic and applied research and the utility of Lattai and Perone’s Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 119–136.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • WACKER, D. P. (1996). Behavior analysis research in Jaba: A need for studies that bridge basic and applied research. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 14, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A Faculty Research/Creative Grant awarded to Mark Dixon by Southern Illinois University in part supported this research. We thank Daniel Fienup for assistance with participant recruitment and data collection. We also thank Dr. Thomas Critchfield for his constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dixon, M.R., Schreiber, J.E. Near-Miss Effects on Response Latencies and Win Estimations of Slot Machine Players. Psychol Rec 54, 335–348 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395477

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395477

Navigation