Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health 3/2012

01.06.2012 | Brief Report

Context by treatment interactions as the primary object of study in cluster randomized controlled trials of population health interventions

verfasst von: Daniel Fuller, Louise Potvin

Erschienen in: International Journal of Public Health | Ausgabe 3/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cluster randomized controlled trials are increasingly used in population health intervention research. Through randomization, researchers attempt to isolate the treatment effect and remove all other effects, including any effects of social context. In many cases, the constant effect assumption cannot be satisfied in cluster randomized controlled trials. We argue that when studying population health interventions, the effective mechanism of intervention lies in the interaction between the treatment and social context. Researchers should be cognizant that attempts to remove the effect of social context using CRTC may fail. The interaction between the treatment and social context should be the primary object of study in population health intervention research.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bonell CP, Hargreaves J, Cousens S, Ross D, Hayes R, Petticrew M, Kirkwood BR (2011) Altenatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions. J Epidemiol Community Health 65(7):582–587PubMedCrossRef Bonell CP, Hargreaves J, Cousens S, Ross D, Hayes R, Petticrew M, Kirkwood BR (2011) Altenatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions. J Epidemiol Community Health 65(7):582–587PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG (2004) CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J 328(7441):702–708CrossRef Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG (2004) CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. Br Med J 328(7441):702–708CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cousens S, Hargreaves J, Bonell C, Armstrong B, Thomas J, Kirkwood BR, Hayes R (2011) Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public-health interventions: statistical analysis and causal inference. J Epidemiol Community Health 65(7):576–581PubMedCrossRef Cousens S, Hargreaves J, Bonell C, Armstrong B, Thomas J, Kirkwood BR, Hayes R (2011) Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public-health interventions: statistical analysis and causal inference. J Epidemiol Community Health 65(7):576–581PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J 337(a1655):979–983 Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. Br Med J 337(a1655):979–983
Zurück zum Zitat Cronbach LJ (1975) Beyond two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol 30:116–127CrossRef Cronbach LJ (1975) Beyond two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol 30:116–127CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards SJL, Braunholtz DA, Lilford RJ, Stevens AJ (1999) Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 318(7195):1407–1409CrossRef Edwards SJL, Braunholtz DA, Lilford RJ, Stevens AJ (1999) Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 318(7195):1407–1409CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Feder GS, Rudnicka AR, Ukoumunne OC (2004) Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials 1:80–90PubMedCrossRef Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Feder GS, Rudnicka AR, Ukoumunne OC (2004) Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials 1:80–90PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiments. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiments. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
Zurück zum Zitat Hawe P, Potvin L (2009) What is population health intervention research. Can J Public Health 100(1):I8–I14PubMed Hawe P, Potvin L (2009) What is population health intervention research. Can J Public Health 100(1):I8–I14PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Holland PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 81(396):945–970 Holland PW (1986) Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). J Am Stat Assoc 81(396):945–970
Zurück zum Zitat Hume D (1739) A Treatise of Human Nature. Project Gutenburg Hume D (1739) A Treatise of Human Nature. Project Gutenburg
Zurück zum Zitat Kemm J (2006) The limitations of ‘evidence-based’ public health. J Eval Clin Pract 12(3):319–324PubMedCrossRef Kemm J (2006) The limitations of ‘evidence-based’ public health. J Eval Clin Pract 12(3):319–324PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Macintyre S (2011) Good intentions and received wisdom are not good enough: the need for controlled trials in public health. J Epidemiol Community Health 65(7):564–567PubMedCrossRef Macintyre S (2011) Good intentions and received wisdom are not good enough: the need for controlled trials in public health. J Epidemiol Community Health 65(7):564–567PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Murray DM (1998) Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Oxford University Press, New York Murray DM (1998) Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. Oxford University Press, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Poland B, Frohlich KL, Cargo M (2008) Context as a fundamental dimension of health promotion evaluation. In: Potvin L, McQueen DV (eds) Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: values and research. Springer, New York, pp 299–317CrossRef Poland B, Frohlich KL, Cargo M (2008) Context as a fundamental dimension of health promotion evaluation. In: Potvin L, McQueen DV (eds) Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: values and research. Springer, New York, pp 299–317CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Puffer S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J (2003) Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. Br Med J 328:785CrossRef Puffer S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J (2003) Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. Br Med J 328:785CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66:688–701CrossRef Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66:688–701CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Shadish WR (2010) Campbell and Rubin: a primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings. Psychol Methods 15(1):3–17PubMedCrossRef Shadish WR (2010) Campbell and Rubin: a primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings. Psychol Methods 15(1):3–17PubMedCrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, Gaist P, Jarlais DCD, Holtgrave D, Szapocznik J, Fishbein M, Rapkin B, Clatts M, Mullen PD (2008) Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health 98(8):1359–1366PubMedCrossRef West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, Gaist P, Jarlais DCD, Holtgrave D, Szapocznik J, Fishbein M, Rapkin B, Clatts M, Mullen PD (2008) Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health 98(8):1359–1366PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Context by treatment interactions as the primary object of study in cluster randomized controlled trials of population health interventions
verfasst von
Daniel Fuller
Louise Potvin
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2012
Verlag
SP Birkhäuser Verlag Basel
Erschienen in
International Journal of Public Health / Ausgabe 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1661-8556
Elektronische ISSN: 1661-8564
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0357-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2012

International Journal of Public Health 3/2012 Zur Ausgabe