Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2017

10.01.2017 | Original Article

Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner

verfasst von: Leonardo Tavares Camardella, Hero Breuning, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of measurements made on digital models created using an intraoral color scanner compared to measurements on dental plaster models.

Methods

This study included impressions of 28 volunteers. Alginate impressions were used to make plaster models, and each volunteers’ dentition was scanned with a TRIOS Color intraoral scanner. Two examiners performed measurements on the plaster models using a digital caliper and measured the digital models using Ortho Analyzer software. The examiners measured 52 distances, including tooth diameter and height, overjet, overbite, intercanine and intermolar distances, and the sagittal relationship. The paired t test was used to assess intra-examiner performance and measurement accuracy of the two examiners for both plaster and digital models. The level of clinically relevant differences between the measurements according to the threshold used was evaluated and a formula was applied to calculate the chance of finding clinically relevant errors on measurements on plaster and digital models.

Results

For several parameters, statistically significant differences were found between the measurements on the two different models. However, most of these discrepancies were not considered clinically significant. The measurement of the crown height of upper central incisors had the highest measurement error for both examiners. Based on the interexaminer performance, reproducibility of the measurements was poor for some of the parameters.

Conclusions

Overall, our findings showed that most of the measurements on digital models created using the TRIOS Color scanner and measured with Ortho Analyzer software had a clinically acceptable accuracy compared to the same measurements made with a caliper on plaster models, but the measuring method can affect the reproducibility of the measurements.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J et al (2012) Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 39:151–159CrossRefPubMed Abizadeh N, Moles DR, O’Neill J et al (2012) Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod 39:151–159CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial 144:916–922CrossRef Akyalcin S, Cozad BE, English JD et al (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial 144:916–922CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C et al (2010) Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 32:589–595CrossRefPubMed Bootvong K, Liu Z, McGrath C et al (2010) Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 32:589–595CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA et al (2012) Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofac. Orthop 142:308–313CrossRef Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA et al (2012) Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofac. Orthop 142:308–313CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de Waard O, Rangel FA, Fudalej PS et al (2014) Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146:328–336CrossRefPubMed de Waard O, Rangel FA, Fudalej PS et al (2014) Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146:328–336CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A (2011) Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 14:1–16CrossRefPubMed Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A (2011) Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 14:1–16CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K et al (2013) Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144:471–478CrossRefPubMed Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K et al (2013) Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 144:471–478CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Garino F, Garino GB (2002) Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 3:250–254 Garino F, Garino GB (2002) Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts. World J Orthod 3:250–254
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A et al (2016) Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 38:422–428CrossRefPubMed Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A et al (2016) Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 38:422–428CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE (2014) Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146:673–682CrossRefPubMed Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE (2014) Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146:673–682CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL et al (2014) Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:157–164CrossRefPubMed Grunheid T, Patel N, De Felippe NL et al (2014) Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 145:157–164CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurt AJ (2012) Digital technology in the orthodontic laboratory. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:245–247CrossRef Hurt AJ (2012) Digital technology in the orthodontic laboratory. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:245–247CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N et al (2010) Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little’s Index. Angle Orthod 80:435–439CrossRefPubMed Kau CH, Littlefield J, Rainy N et al (2010) Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little’s Index. Angle Orthod 80:435–439CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, Heo G, Lagravere MO (2014) Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 84:443–450CrossRefPubMed Kim J, Heo G, Lagravere MO (2014) Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 84:443–450CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS et al. (2009) Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:16 e1–4 (discussion 16) Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS et al. (2009) Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 136:16 e1–4 (discussion 16)
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132:346–352CrossRef Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P et al (2007) Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 132:346–352CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Naidu D, Freer TJ (2013) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144:304–310CrossRef Naidu D, Freer TJ (2013) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner: a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144:304–310CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandis N (2012) Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:519–521CrossRef Pandis N (2012) Sample calculations for comparison of 2 means. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 141:519–521CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M et al (2003) Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 124:101–105CrossRef Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M et al (2003) Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 124:101–105CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B et al (2006) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:794–803CrossRef Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B et al (2006) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 129:794–803CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM et al (2001) A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 71:351–357PubMed Tomassetti JJ, Taloumis LJ, Denny JM et al (2001) A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. Angle Orthod 71:351–357PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:474–481CrossRefPubMed Torassian G, Kau CH, English JD et al (2010) Digital models vs plaster models using alginate and alginate substitute materials. Angle Orthod 80:474–481CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D et al (2012) Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7:e43312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D et al (2012) Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7:e43312CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS (2010) Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:456 e1–9 (discussion 456–457) White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS (2010) Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:456 e1–9 (discussion 456–457)
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Nolthenius HET et al (2013) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:140–147CrossRef Wiranto MG, Engelbrecht WP, Nolthenius HET et al (2013) Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 143:140–147CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA (2003) Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73:301–306PubMed Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA (2003) Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73:301–306PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner
verfasst von
Leonardo Tavares Camardella
Hero Breuning
Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Publikationsdatum
10.01.2017
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0070-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Mitteilungen DGKFO

Mitteilungen der DGKFO

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.