Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Glioma Grading and Determination of IDH Mutation Status and ATRX loss by DCE and ASL Perfusion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion in glioma grading according to the previous WHO classification of 2007, as well as concerning isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status and ATRX expression as required by the new WHO 2016 brain tumor classification.

Methods

The mean values of Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and Vp by DCE perfusion, and cerebral blood flow (CBF) by ASL perfusion were assessed retrospectively in 40 patients with initial glioma diagnosis. Perfusion parameters were correlated and compared concerning glioma grading, IDH mutation status and ATRX expression.

Results

The DCE and ASL perfusion parameters showed merely moderate correlation. The Ktrans, Ve, and CBF by DCE perfusion were different in low-grade and high-grade gliomas (p = 0.0018, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.0038, respectively). Ve was useful in distinguishing high-grade from low-grade gliomas (p = 0.024, sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.80). CBF by ASL perfusion enabled discrimination of astrocytomas with and without IDH mutation (p = 0.014, sensitivity = 0.75, specificity = 0.88) and showed a trend for the discrimination of astrocytomas with IDH mutation from oligodendrogliomas (p = 0.074).

Conclusion

In conclusion, DCE and ASL perfusion are complementary in the differentiation of gliomas. The discrimination of low- and high-grade gliomas is possible by the DCE perfusion parameter Ve, while ASL perfusion shows potential for the differentiation of the IDH and ATRX mutation status of gliomas following the new WHO classification 2016. Both perfusion techniques might represent different aspects of brain tumor perfusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, Mankoo P, Carter H, Siu IM, Gallia GL, Olivi A, McLendon R, Rasheed BA, Keir S, Nikolskaya T, Nikolsky Y, Busam DA, Tekleab H, Diaz LA Jr, Hartigan J, Smith DR, Strausberg RL, Marie SK, Shinjo SM, Yan H, Riggins GJ, Bigner DD, Karchin R, Papadopoulos N, Parmigiani G, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321(5897):1807–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Brat DJ, Verhaak RG, Aldape KD, Yung WK, Salama SR, Cooper LA, Rheinbay E, Miller CR, Vitucci M, Morozova O, Robertson AG, Noushmehr H, Laird PW, Cherniack AD, Akbani R, Huse JT, Ciriello G, Poisson LM, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Berger MS, Brennan C, Colen RR, Colman H, Flanders AE, Giannini C, Grifford M, Iavarone A, Jain R, Joseph I, Kim J, Kasaian K, Mikkelsen T, Murray BA, O’Neill BP, Pachter L, Parsons DW, Sougnez C, Sulman EP, Vandenberg SR, Van Meir EG, von Deimling A, Zhang H, Crain D, Lau K, Mallery D, Morris S, Paulauskis J, Penny R, Shelton T, Sherman M, Yena P, Black A, Bowen J, Dicostanzo K, Gastier-Foster J, Leraas KM, Lichtenberg TM, Pierson CR, Ramirez NC, Taylor C, Weaver S, Wise L, Zmuda E, Davidsen T, Demchok JA, Eley G, Ferguson ML, Hutter CM, Mills Shaw KR, Ozenberger BA, Sheth M, Sofia HJ, Tarnuzzer R, Wang Z, Yang L, Zenklusen JC, Ayala B, Baboud J, Chudamani S, Jensen MA, Liu J, Pihl T, Raman R, Wan Y, Wu Y, Ally A, Auman JT, Balasundaram M, Balu S, Baylin SB, Beroukhim R, Bootwalla MS, Bowlby R, Bristow CA, Brooks D, Butterfield Y, Carlsen R, Carter S, Chin L, Chu A, Chuah E, Cibulskis K, Clarke A, Coetzee SG, Dhalla N, Fennell T, Fisher S, Gabriel S, Getz G, Gibbs R, Guin R, Hadjipanayis A, Hayes DN, Hinoue T, Hoadley K, Holt RA, Hoyle AP, Jefferys SR, Jones S, Jones CD, Kucherlapati R, Lai PH, Lander E, Lee S, Lichtenstein L, Ma Y, Maglinte DT, Mahadeshwar HS, Marra MA, Mayo M, Meng S, Meyerson ML, Mieczkowski PA, Moore RA, Mose LE, Mungall AJ, Pantazi A, Parfenov M, Park PJ, Parker JS, Perou CM, Protopopov A, Ren X, Roach J, Sabedot TS, Schein J, Schumacher SE, Seidman JG, Seth S, Shen H, Simons JV, Sipahimalani P, Soloway MG, Song X, Sun H, Tabak B, Tam A, Tan D, Tang J, Thiessen N, Triche T Jr, Van Den Berg DJ, Veluvolu U, Waring S, Weisenberger DJ, Wilkerson MD, Wong T, Wu J, Xi L, Xu AW, Yang L, Zack TI, Zhang J, Aksoy BA, Arachchi H, Benz C, Bernard B, Carlin D, Cho J, DiCara D, Frazer S, Fuller GN, Gao J, Gehlenborg N, Haussler D, Heiman DI, Iype L, Jacobsen A, Ju Z, Katzman S, Kim H, Knijnenburg T, Kreisberg RB, Lawrence MS, Lee W, Leinonen K, Lin P, Ling S, Liu W, Liu Y, Liu Y, Lu Y, Mills G, Ng S, Noble MS, Paull E, Rao A, Reynolds S, Saksena G, Sanborn Z, Sander C, Schultz N, Senbabaoglu Y, Shen R, Shmulevich I, Sinha R, Stuart J, Sumer SO, Sun Y, Tasman N, Taylor BS, Voet D, Weinhold N, Weinstein JN, Yang D, Yoshihara K, Zheng S, Zhang W, Zou L, Abel T, Sadeghi S, Cohen ML, Eschbacher J, Hattab EM, Raghunathan A, Schniederjan MJ, Aziz D, Barnett G, Barrett W, Bigner DD, Boice L, Brewer C, Calatozzolo C, Campos B, Carlotti CG Jr, Chan TA, Cuppini L, Curley E, Cuzzubbo S, Devine K, DiMeco F, Duell R, Elder JB, Fehrenbach A, Finocchiaro G, Friedman W, Fulop J, Gardner J, Hermes B, Herold-Mende C, Jungk C, Kendler A, Lehman NL, Lipp E, Liu O, Mandt R, McGraw M, Mclendon R, McPherson C, Neder L, Nguyen P, Noss A, Nunziata R, Ostrom QT, Palmer C, Perin A, Pollo B, Potapov A, Potapova O, Rathmell WK, Rotin D, Scarpace L, Schilero C, Senecal K, Shimmel K, Shurkhay V, Sifri S, Singh R, Sloan AE, Smolenski K, Staugaitis SM, Steele R, Thorne L, Tirapelli DP, Unterberg A, Vallurupalli M, Wang Y, Warnick R, Williams F, Wolinsky Y, Bell S, Rosenberg M, Stewart C, Huang F, Grimsby JL, Radenbaugh AJ, Zhang J. Comprehensive, integrative genomic analysis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2481–98.

  3. Chen N, Yu T, Gong J, Nie L, Chen X, Zhang M, Xu M, Tan J, Su Z, Zhong J, Zhou Q. IDH1/2 gene hotspot mutations in central nervous system tumours: analysis of 922 Chinese patients. Pathology. 2016;48(7):675–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo J, Yao C, Chen H, Zhuang D, Tang W, Ren G, Wang Y, Wu J, Huang F, Zhou L. The relationship between Cho/NAA and glioma metabolism: implementation for margin delineation of cerebral gliomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(8):1361–70, discussion 1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faehndrich J, Weidauer S, Pilatus U, Oszvald A, Zanella FE, Hattingen E. Neuroradiological viewpoint on the diagnostics of space-occupying brain lesions. Clin Neuroradiol. 2011;21(3):123–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haegler K, Wiesmann M, Böhm C, Freiherr J, Schnell O, Brückmann H, Tonn JC, Linn J. New similarity search based glioma grading. Neuroradiology. 2012;54(8):829–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Essig M, Shiroishi MS, Nguyen TB, Saake M, Provenzale JM, Enterline D, Anzalone N, Dörfler A, Rovira A, Wintermark M, Law M. Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked technical questions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(1):24–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen N, Zhao L, Jiang J, Jiang R, Su C, Zhang S, Tang X, Zhu W. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging analysis of diffusion and microperfusion in grading gliomas and comparison with arterial spin labeling for evaluation of tumor perfusion. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;44(3):620–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Warmuth C, Gunther M, Zimmer C. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2003;228(2):523–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy B, Awasthi R, Bindal A, Sahoo P, Kumar R, Behari S, Ojha BK, Husain N, Pandey CM, Rathore RK, Gupta RK. Comparative evaluation of 3-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in grading of human glioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2013;37(3):321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arevalo-Perez J, Peck KK, Young RJ, Holodny AI, Karimi S, Lyo JK. Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging in grading of gliomas. J Neuroimaging. 2015;25(5):792–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hempel JM, Bisdas S, Schittenhelm J, Brendle C, Bender B, Wassmann H, Skardelly M, Tabatabai G, Vega SC, Ernemann U, Klose U. In vivo molecular profiling of human glioma using diffusion kurtosis imaging. J Neurooncol. 2017;131(1):93–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Haacke EM, Filleti CL, Gattu R, Ciulla C, Al-Bashir A, Suryanarayanan K, Li M, Latif Z, DelProposto Z, Sehgal V, Li T, Torquato V, Kanaparti R, Jiang J, Neelavalli J. New algorithm for quantifying vascular changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI independent of absolute T1 values. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58(3):463–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, Larsson HB, Lee TY, Mayr NA, Parker GJ, Port RE, Taylor J, Weisskoff RM. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):223–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Santarosa C, Castellano A, Conte GM, Cadioli M, Iadanza A, Terreni MR, Franzin A, Bello L, Caulo M, Falini A, Anzalone N. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(6):1147–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Alcaide-Leon P, Rovira À. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR: importance of reaching the washout phase. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(5):E58–E9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abe T, Mizobuchi Y, Nakajima K, Otomi Y, Irahara S, Obama Y, Majigsuren M, Khashbat D, Kageji T, Nagahiro S, Harada M. Diagnosis of brain tumors using dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging with a short acquisition time. Springerplus. 2015;4:88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung SC, Yeom JA, Kim JH, Ryoo I, Kim SC, Shin H, Lee AL, Yun TJ, Park CK, Sohn CH, Park SH, Choi SH. Glioma: application of histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to tumor grading. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(6):1103–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Noguchi T, Yoshiura T, Hiwatashi A, Togao O, Yamashita K, Nagao E, Shono T, Mizoguchi M, Nagata S, Sasaki T, Suzuki SO, Iwaki T, Kobayashi K, Mihara F, Honda H. Perfusion imaging of brain tumors using arterial spin-labeling: correlation with histopathologic vascular density. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(4):688–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf RL, Wang J, Wang S, Melhem ER, O’Rourke DM, Judy KD, Detre JA. Grading of CNS neoplasms using continuous arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;22(4):475–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Choi C, Raisanen JM, Ganji SK, Zhang S, McNeil SS, An Z, Madan A, Hatanpaa KJ, Vemireddy V, Sheppard CA, Oliver D, Hulsey KM, Tiwari V, Mashimo T, Battiste J, Barnett S, Madden CJ, Patel TR, Pan E, Malloy CR, Mickey BE, Bachoo RM, Maher EA. Prospective longitudinal analysis of 2-hydroxyglutarate magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies broad clinical utility for the management of patients with IDH-mutant glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(33):4030–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunn GP, Andronesi OC, Cahill DP. From genomics to the clinic: biological and translational insights of mutant IDH1/2 in glioma. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(2):E2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Masui K, Cavenee WK, Mischel PS. Cancer metabolism as a central driving force of glioma pathogenesis. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2016;33(3):161–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Turkalp Z, Karamchandani J, Das S. IDH mutation in glioma: new insights and promises for the future. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(10):1319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kickingereder P, Sahm F, Radbruch A, Wick W, Heiland S, Deimling Av, Bendszus M, Wiestler B. IDH mutation status is associated with a distinct hypoxia/angiogenesis transcriptome signature which is non-invasively predictable with rCBV imaging in human glioma. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Unruh D, Schwarze SR, Khoury L, Thomas C, Wu M, Chen L, Chen R, Liu Y, Schwartz MA, Amidei C, Kumthekar P, Benjamin CG, Song K, Dawson C, Rispoli JM, Fatterpekar G, Golfinos JG, Kondziolka D, Karajannis M, Pacione D, Zagzag D, McIntyre T, Snuderl M, Horbinski C. Mutant IDH1 and thrombosis in gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;132(6):917–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Venneti S, Huse JT. The evolving molecular genetics of low-grade glioma. Adv Anat Pathol. 2015;22(2):94–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gagner JP, Law M, Fischer I, Newcomb EW, Zagzag D. Angiogenesis in gliomas: imaging and experimental therapeutics. Brain Pathol. 2005;15(4):342–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pauliah M, Saxena V, Haris M, Husain N, Rathore RK, Gupta RK. Improved T(1)-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to probe microvascularity and heterogeneity of human glioma. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(9):1292–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sourbron S, Ingrisch M, Siefert A, Reiser M, Herrmann K. Quantification of cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, and blood-brain-barrier leakage with DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62(1):205–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Brasch RC, Dillon WP. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(5):891–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Viallon M, Cuvinciuc V, Delattre B, Merlini L, Barnaure-Nachbar I, Toso-Patel S, Becker M, Lovblad KO, Haller S. State-of-the-art MRI techniques in neuroradiology: principles, pitfalls, and clinical applications. Neuroradiology. 2015;57(5):441–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Grade M, Hernandez Tamames JA, Pizzini FB, Achten E, Golay X, Smits M. A neuroradiologist’s guide to arterial spin labeling MRI in clinical practice. Neuroradiology. 2015;57(12):1181–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Cornelia Brendle is supported by the TÜFF program of the Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen (application number 2395-0-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Brendle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology has a collaboration contract with Siemen Healthcare concerning the technical development of PET/MRI Biograph mMR. Otherwise, the authors Cornelia Brendle, Johann-Martin Hempel, Jens Schittenhelm, Marco Skardelly, Ghazaleh Tabatabai, Benjamin Bender, Ulrike Ernemann and Uwe Klose have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brendle, C., Hempel, JM., Schittenhelm, J. et al. Glioma Grading and Determination of IDH Mutation Status and ATRX loss by DCE and ASL Perfusion. Clin Neuroradiol 28, 421–428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-017-0590-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-017-0590-z

Keywords

Navigation