nach oben

Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin

Erschienen in:

01.11.2013 | Originalien

Predictive value of outcome scores in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock complicating AMI

APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute–Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II

verfasst von: P. Kellner, MD, R. Prondzinsky, MD, L. Pallmann, MD, S. Siegmann, MD, S. Unverzagt, PhD, H. Lemm, MD, S. Dietz, MD, J. Soukup, MD, K. Werdan, MD, M. Buerke, MD

Erschienen in: Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin | Ausgabe 8/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Scoring systems in critical care patients are essential for prediction of outcome and for evaluation of therapy. In this study we determined the value of the APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute–Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II scoring systems in the prediction of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Material and methods

In this prospective, observational study, patients who were admitted to the ICU with CS complicating AMI were consecutively included. Data for the APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute–Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II scores were recorded on admission and during the following 96 h. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to estimate the predictive ability (mortality) of the scoring systems on admission and the maximum value.

Results

Mortality among the 41 patients included in this study was 44 %. On admission, the mean APACHE II (p = 0.035), APACHE III (p = 0.003), SAPS II (p = 0.001), and SOFA (p = 0.042) scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors. At maximum score, APACHE II (p = 0.009), APACHE III (p < 0.001), and SAPS II (p < 0.001) appeared to have higher significance. On admission, the discrimination for APACHE III was 0.786, for SAPS II 0.790, and for APACHE II 0.691. The maximum-score AUC for APACHE II was 0.726, for APACHE III 0.827, and for SAPS II 0.832. Elebute–Stoner and SOFA did not yield valuable results at maximum score or, in the case of Elebute–Stoner, on admission.

Conclusion

These results suggest that at the time of diagnosis and at maximum value, the SAPS II, APACHE III, and APACHE II scores may be useful in predicting a high probability of survival of patients with CS complicating AMI.

Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW et al (2004) ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 44:E1–E211PubMedCrossRef

Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ et al (2005) Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 294:448–454PubMedCrossRef

Birkeland JA, Sejersted OM, Taraldsen T et al (2005) EC-coupling in normal and failing hearts. Scand Cardiovasc J 39:13–23PubMedCrossRef

Bohnen JM, Mustard RA, Schouten BD (1994) Steroids, APACHE II score, and the outcome of abdominal infection. Arch Surg 129:33–37 (discussion 37–38)PubMedCrossRef

Buerke M, Russ M, Werdan K (2008) Cardiogenic shock in myocardial infarction: revascularization, mechanical support and pharmacotherapy. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 133:2516–2521PubMedCrossRef

Buerke M, Schwertz H, Langin T et al (2006) Proteome analysis of myocardial tissue following ischemia and reperfusion–effects of complement inhibition. Biochim Biophys Acta 1764:1536–1545PubMedCrossRef

Carson SS, Bach PB (2001) Predicting mortality in patients suffering from prolonged critical illness: an assessment of four severity-of-illness measures. Chest 120:928–933PubMedCrossRef

De Cassia Braga Ribeiro K, Kowalski LP (2003) APACHE II, POSSUM, and ASA scores and the risk of perioperative complications in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:739–745

Elebute EA, Stoner HB (1983) The grading of sepsis. Br J Surg 70:29–31PubMedCrossRef

10.

Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP et al (1993) Prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis. Am J Surg 166:262–268 (discussion 269)PubMedCrossRef

11.

Fiaccadori E, Maggiore U, Lombardi M et al (2000) Predicting patient outcome from acute renal failure comparing three general severity of illness scoring systems. Kidney Int 58:283–292PubMedCrossRef

12.

Goel A, Pinckney RG, Littenberg B (2003) APACHE II predicts long-term survival in COPD patients admitted to a general medical ward. J Gen Intern Med 18:824–830PubMedCrossRef

13.

Goldberg RJ, Samad NA, Yarzebski J et al (1999) Temporal trends in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 340:1162–1168PubMedCrossRef

14.

Hanley JA, Mcneil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36PubMed

15.

Hochman JS (2003) Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm. Circulation 107:2998–3002PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG et al (1999) Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 341:625–634PubMedCrossRef

17.

Hollenberg SM (2004) Recognition and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 25:661–671PubMedCrossRef

18.

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York, p 392

19.

Janssens U, Graf C, Graf J et al (2000) Evaluation of the SOFA score: a single-center experience of a medical intensive care unit in 303 consecutive patients with predominantly cardiovascular disorders. Sequential organ failure assessment. Intensive Care Med 26:1037–1045PubMedCrossRef

20.

Jeger RV, Harkness SM, Ramanathan K et al (2006) Emergency revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock on admission: a report from the SHOCK trial and registry. Eur Heart J 27:664–670PubMedCrossRef

21.

Joulin O, Petillot P, Labalette M et al (2007) Cytokine profile of human septic shock serum inducing cardiomyocyte contractile dysfunction. Physiol Res 56:291–297PubMed

22.

Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP et al (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–829PubMedCrossRef

23.

Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA et al (1991) The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest 100:1619–1636PubMedCrossRef

24.

Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963CrossRef

25.

Mark B, Zahn R, Donges K et al (2000) Current use and outcomes of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in routine cardiology. Med Klin (Munich) 95:429–434

26.

Markgraf R, Deutschinoff G, Pientka L et al (2001) Performance of the score systems Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III at an interdisciplinary intensive care unit, after customization. Crit Care 5:31–36PubMedCrossRef

27.

Menon V, Slater JN, White HD et al (2000) Acute myocardial infarction complicated by systemic hypoperfusion without hypotension: report of the SHOCK trial registry. Am J Med 108:374–380PubMedCrossRef

28.

Menon V, White H, Lejemtel T et al (2000) The clinical profile of patients with suspected cardiogenic shock due to predominant left ventricular failure: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK? J Am Coll Cardiol 36:1071–1076PubMedCrossRef

29.

Metnitz PG, Valentin A, Vesely H et al (1999) Prognostic performance and customization of the SAPS II: results of a multicenter Austrian study. Simplified Acute Physiology Score. Intensive Care Med 25:192–197PubMedCrossRef

30.

Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R et al (1999) The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 25:686–696PubMedCrossRef

31.

Oda S, Hirasawa H, Sugai T et al (2000) Comparison of Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and CIS (cellular injury score) for scoring of severity for patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Intensive Care Med 26:1786–1793PubMedCrossRef

32.

Pilz G, Kaab S, Kreuzer E et al (1994) Evaluation of definitions and parameters for sepsis assessment in patients after cardiac surgery. Infection 22:8–17PubMedCrossRef

33.

Prondzinsky R, Lemm H, Swyter M et al (2010) Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP SHOCK Trial for attenuation of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med 38:152–160PubMedCrossRef

34.

Prondzinsky R, Unverzagt S, Lemm H et al (2012) Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: prognostic impact of cytokines: INF-gamma, TNF-alpha, MIP-1beta, G-CSF, and MCP-1beta. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 107:476–484PubMedCrossRef

35.

Reina A, Vazquez G, Aguayo E et al (1997) Mortality discrimination in acute myocardial infarction: comparison between APACHE III and SAPS II prognosis systems. PAEEC Group. Intensive Care Med 23:326–330PubMedCrossRef

36.

Reynolds HR, Hochman JS (2008) Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation 117:686–697PubMedCrossRef

37.

Rutledge R, Fakhry S, Rutherford E et al (1993) Comparison of APACHE II, Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score as predictors of outcome in critically injured trauma patients. Am J Surg 166:244–247PubMedCrossRef

38.

Schuster HP, Schuster FP, Ritschel P et al (1997) The ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) to predict outcome in coronary care patients. Intensive Care Med 23:1056–1061PubMedCrossRef

39.

Schwertz H, Muller-Werdan U, Prondzinsky R et al (2004) Catecholamine therapy in cardiogenic shock: helpful, useless or dangerous? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 129:1925–1930PubMedCrossRef

40.

Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working group on sepsis-related problems of the european society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710PubMedCrossRef

41.

Von Bierbrauer A, Riedel S, Cassel W et al (1998) Validation of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) III scoring system and comparison with APACHE II in German intensive care units. Anaesthesist 47:30–38CrossRef

42.

Werdan K, Pilz G, Bujdoso O et al (2007) Score-based immunoglobulin G therapy of patients with sepsis: the SBITS study. Crit Care Med 35:2693–2701PubMedCrossRef

43.

Werdan K, Pilz G, Muller-Werdan U et al (2008) Immunoglobulin G treatment of postcardiac surgery patients with score-identified severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome—the ESSICS study. Crit Care Med 36:716–723PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Predictive value of outcome scores in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock complicating AMI
APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute–Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II
verfasst von: P. Kellner, MD
R. Prondzinsky, MD
L. Pallmann, MD
S. Siegmann, MD
S. Unverzagt, PhD
H. Lemm, MD
S. Dietz, MD
J. Soukup, MD
K. Werdan, MD
M. Buerke, MD
Publikationsdatum: 01.11.2013
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin / Ausgabe 8/2013
Print ISSN: 2193-6218
Elektronische ISSN: 2193-6226
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-013-0234-2

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren

Springer Medizin

Predictive value of outcome scores in patients suffering from cardiogenic shock complicating AMI

APACHE II, APACHE III, Elebute–Stoner, SOFA, and SAPS II

Abstract

Background

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Magen-Darm-Blutungen werden präklinisch oft falsch eingeschätzt

Sepsis-Verdacht: Eine Stunde, fünf essenzielle Maßnahmen

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Update AINS

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Material and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2013

Patientensicherheit in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin

Mitteilungen der ÖGIAIN

Das abdominelle Kompartmentsyndrom

Vigilanzminderung und Anisokorie nach Subduralhämatom

Gastroenterologische Intensivmedizin

Akutes Leberversagen

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

Magen-Darm-Blutungen werden präklinisch oft falsch eingeschätzt

Sepsis-Verdacht: Eine Stunde, fünf essenzielle Maßnahmen

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Update AINS