Abstract
Purpose
The pathogenetic mechanism, progression, and instability in geriatric bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum (BFFSs) remain poorly understood. This study investigated the hypothesis of sequential BFFS progression by analysing X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets.
Methods
Imaging data from 78 cases were retrospectively analysed. Fractures were categorized using the CT-based Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis classification. MRI datasets were analysed to detect relevant fracture location information. The longitudinal sacral fracture was graded as stage 1 (bone oedema) on MRI, stage 2 (recent fracture), stage 3 (healing fracture), or stage 4 (non-union) on CT. Ligamentous avulsions at the L5 transverse process and iliac crest were also captured.
Results
Contralateral sacral lesions were only recognized by initial bone oedema on MRI in 17/78 (22%) cases. There were 22 cases without and 56 cases with an interconnecting transverse fracture component (TFC) [between S1/S2 (n = 39) or between S2/S3 (n = 17)]. With 30/78 patients showing bilateral fracture lines at different stages (1/2: n = 13, 2/3: n = 13, 1/3: n = 4) and 38 at similar stages, Wilcoxon tests showed a significant stage difference (p < 0.001). Forty cases had a coexistent L5 transverse process avulsion, consistent with a failing iliolumbar ligament. Analysis of variance revealed significant increases in ligamentous avulsions with higher fracture stages (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Our results support the hypothesis of stagewise BFFS progression starting with unilateral sacral disruption followed by a contralateral lesion. Loss of sacral alar support leads to a TFC. Subsequent bone disruption causes iliolumbar ligament avulsion. MRI is recommended to detect bone oedema.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Leung ASO, Gordon LM, Skrinskas T, Szwedowski T, Whyne CM. Effects of bone density alterations on strain patterns in the pelvis: application of a finite element model. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2009;223:965–79. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544119JEIM618.
Pentacost RL, Murray RA, Brindley HH. Fatigue, Insufficiency and the pathologic fractures. JAMA. 1964;187:1001–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1964.03060260029006.
Lourie H. Spontaneous osteoporotic fracture of the sacrum. An unrecognized syndrome of the elderly. JAMA. 1982;248:715–7.
Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–75. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.061113.
Weber M, Hasler P, Gerber H. Insufficiency fractures of the sacrum. Twenty cases and review of the literature. Spine. 1993;18:2507–12.
Andrich S, Haastert B, Neuhaus E, Neidert K, Arend W, Ohmann C, et al. Epidemiology of Pelvic Fractures in Germany: considerably high incidence rates among older people. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139078. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139078.
Mendel T, Radetzki F, Schwan S, Hofmann GO, Goehre F. The influence of injecting an epidural contrast agent into the sacral canal on the fluoroscopic visibility of bony landmarks for sacroiliac screw fixation: a feasibility study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:199–204. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14160.
Park J, Park S, Lee HJ, Lee C, Chang B, Kim H. Mortality following benign sacral insufficiency fracture and associated risk factors. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0395-3.
Lattauschke A, Klauke F, Ullrich BW, Hofmann GO, Mendel T. Behandlungsverlauf der operativen Versorgung einer Sakruminsuffizienzfraktur: erfolgreiches oder folgenreiches Handeln? Unfallchirurg. 2017;120:890–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-017-0403-5.
Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury. 2013;44:1733–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.023.
Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problemRetrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:67–81.
Schreiber JJ, Hughes AP, Taher F, Girardi FP. An association can be found between hounsfield units and success of lumbar spine fusion. HSS J. 2014;10:25–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-013-9367-3.
Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Lauder T, del Rio AM, Bruce RJ, Binkley N. Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:588–95. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00003.
Wagner D, Kamer L, Sawaguchi T, Richards RG, Noser H, Rommens PM. Sacral bone mass distribution assessed by averaged three-dimensional CT models: implications for pathogenesis and treatment of fragility fractures of the sacrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:584–90. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00726.
Buckley R, Moran CG, Apivatthakkul T. AO Priciples of Fracture Management. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2017.
Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–9. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
Peretz AM, Hipp JA, Heggeness MH. The internal bony architecture of the sacrum. Spine. 1998;23:971–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199805010-00001.
Na WC, Lee SH, Jung S, Jang HW, Jo S. Pelvic insufficiency fracture in severe osteoporosis patient. Hip Pelvis. 2017;29:120–6. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.2.120.
Henes FO, Nüchtern JV, Groth M, Habermann CR, Regier M, Rueger JM, et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography in the detection of pelvic fractures. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:2337–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.07.012.
Nüchtern JV, Hartel MJ, Henes FO, Groth M, Jauch SY, Haegele J, et al. Significance of clinical examination, CT and MRI scan in the diagnosis of posterior pelvic ring fractures. Injury. 2015;46:315–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.050.
Linstrom NJ, Heiserman JE, Kortman KE, Crawford NR, Baek S, Anderson RL, et al. Anatomical and biomechanical analyses of the unique and consistent locations of sacral insufficiency fractures. Spine. 2009;34:309–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191ea01.
Rommens PM, Arand C, Hopf JC, Mehling I, Dietz SO, Wagner D. Progress of instability in fragility fractures of the pelvis: an observational study. Injury. 2019;50:1966–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.038.
Ueda Y, Inui T, Kurata Y, Tsuji H, Saito J, Shitan Y. Prolonged pain in patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis may be due to fracture progression. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01150-0.
Sudhir G, Acharya S, Chahal R. Sacral insufficiency fractures mimicking lumbar spine pathology. Asian Spine J. 2016;10:558–64.
Tamaki Y, Nagamachi A, Inoue K, Takeuchi M, Sugiura K, Omichi Y, et al. Incidence and clinical features of sacral insufficiency fracture in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:1314–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.03.037.
Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD, Morris PP. Imaging and treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures AJNR. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:201–10.
Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y, Link TM. MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:995–1001. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3714.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Stephan Arlt for professional image preparation.
Funding
There is no funding source.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. The study was approved by the independent Medical Ethics Committee of the Medical Council of Saxony-Anhalt, Germany, and confirmed under approval no. 78/17.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendel, T., Ullrich, B.W., Hofmann, G.O. et al. Progressive instability of bilateral sacral fragility fractures in osteoporotic bone: a retrospective analysis of X-ray, CT, and MRI datasets from 78 cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 47, 11–19 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01480-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01480-4