Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Der Anaesthesist 8/2010

01.08.2010 | Originalien

Hyperbaric levobupivacaine in anal surgery

Spinal perianal and spinal saddle blocks

verfasst von: Z. Kazak, MD, P. Ekmekci, K. Kazbek

Erschienen in: Die Anaesthesiologie | Ausgabe 8/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

An ideal anesthetic technique for anal surgery on an outpatient basis should permit early mobilization without pain or residual complications of anesthesia. The aim of this study was to analyze the reliability and efficacy of spinal perianal and spinal saddle block by using two different doses of levobupivacaine for perianal surgery and their effects on voiding, first analgesic requirement and hospital discharge times.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted on 78 ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective perianal surgery. Patients were randomized into two groups, the spinal perianal group and the spinal saddle group. Hyperbaric levobupivacaine 1.5 mg (perianal) or 6 mg (saddle) was administered intrathecally through the L4–5 intervertebral space by a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle with the patient in the sitting position. Sensory block was evaluated using a surgical toothless clamp until satisfactory block reached the S4 sensory level and motor block was evaluated using a modified Bromage scale. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were recorded for each patient. Ambulation, voiding and hospital discharge times were assessed.

Results

There was no statistical difference between the two groups demographically. Perianal low dose levobupivacaine use resulted in no motor block (Bromage=0, p=0.006) and a sensory block limited to the S4 level. The low and conventional doses of levobupivacaine provided sufficient anesthesia during the surgical procedures. The sensory block regression time in the perianal block group was shorter than the saddle group (p=0.048). Time to first analgesic requirement was significantly longer in the saddle block group (p<0.05). The times of first ambulation, the first voiding and hospital discharge in patients with the perianal block were significantly shorter than patients in the saddle block (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.05, respectively).

Conclusion

The results of the study showed that the use of 1.5 mg hyperbaric levobupivacaine provides sufficient and satisfactory anesthesia in ambulatory perianal surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuvas O, Gulec H, Karaaslan M, Basar H (2009) The use of low dose plain solutions of local anaesthetic agents for spinal anaesthesia in the prone position: bupivacaine compared with levobupivacaine. Anaesthesia 64:14–18CrossRefPubMed Cuvas O, Gulec H, Karaaslan M, Basar H (2009) The use of low dose plain solutions of local anaesthetic agents for spinal anaesthesia in the prone position: bupivacaine compared with levobupivacaine. Anaesthesia 64:14–18CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wassef MR, Michaels EI, Rangel JM, Tsyrlin AT (2007) Spinal perianal block: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with spinal saddle block. Anaesth Analg 104:1594–1596CrossRef Wassef MR, Michaels EI, Rangel JM, Tsyrlin AT (2007) Spinal perianal block: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison with spinal saddle block. Anaesth Analg 104:1594–1596CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK (2003) Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 31:637–641PubMed Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK (2003) Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 31:637–641PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G et al (2002) Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Analg 94:194–198CrossRef Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G et al (2002) Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Analg 94:194–198CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Valanne JV, Korhonen A, Jokela RM et al (2001) Selective spinal anaesthesia: a comparison of hyperbaric bupivacaine 4 mg versus 6 mg for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anaesth Analg 93:1377–1379CrossRef Valanne JV, Korhonen A, Jokela RM et al (2001) Selective spinal anaesthesia: a comparison of hyperbaric bupivacaine 4 mg versus 6 mg for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anaesth Analg 93:1377–1379CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamaki KK, Pitkanen MT (2000) A low dose of plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anaesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 25:605–610PubMed Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamaki KK, Pitkanen MT (2000) A low dose of plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anaesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med 25:605–610PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Horlocker TT, Hebl JR (2003) Anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: is there an optimal technique? Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:58–63PubMed Horlocker TT, Hebl JR (2003) Anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: is there an optimal technique? Reg Anesth Pain Med 28:58–63PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Enk D (1998) Unilateral spinal anaesthesia: gadget or tool? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 11:511–515CrossRefPubMed Enk D (1998) Unilateral spinal anaesthesia: gadget or tool? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 11:511–515CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Casati A, Fanelli G (2004) Restricting spinal block to the operative side: why not? Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:4–6PubMed Casati A, Fanelli G (2004) Restricting spinal block to the operative side: why not? Reg Anesth Pain Med 29:4–6PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrison SG, Dominguez JJ, Frascarolo P, Reiz S (2000) A comparison of the electrocardiographic cardiotoxic effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anaesthetized swine. Anaesth Analg 90:1308–1314CrossRef Morrison SG, Dominguez JJ, Frascarolo P, Reiz S (2000) A comparison of the electrocardiographic cardiotoxic effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in anaesthetized swine. Anaesth Analg 90:1308–1314CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H et al (1998) A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46:245–249CrossRefPubMed Bardsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H et al (1998) A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46:245–249CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang YF, Pryor ME, Mather LE, Veering BT (1998) Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. Anaesth Analg 86:797–804CrossRef Huang YF, Pryor ME, Mather LE, Veering BT (1998) Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. Anaesth Analg 86:797–804CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Luck JF, Fettes PDW, Wildsmith JAW (2008) Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: a comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth 101:705–710CrossRefPubMed Luck JF, Fettes PDW, Wildsmith JAW (2008) Spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery: a comparison of hyperbaric solutions of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth 101:705–710CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schug SA (2001) Correction factor for comparisons between levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:91CrossRefPubMed Schug SA (2001) Correction factor for comparisons between levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:91CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Hyperbaric levobupivacaine in anal surgery
Spinal perianal and spinal saddle blocks
verfasst von
Z. Kazak, MD
P. Ekmekci
K. Kazbek
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Die Anaesthesiologie / Ausgabe 8/2010
Print ISSN: 2731-6858
Elektronische ISSN: 2731-6866
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-010-1755-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2010

Der Anaesthesist 8/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Einführung zum Thema

Die Niere in der Sepsis

Trends und Medizinökonomie

Verbesserung der Teamkompetenz im OP

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.