Skip to main content
Log in

Maßgeschneiderte Therapie der Virushepatitis der Gegenwart und Zukunft

Hepatitis B, C, Delta und E

Personalized treatment of viral hepatitis of the present and the future

Hepatitis B, C, delta, and E

  • Schwerpunkt: Individualisierte Infektionsmedizin
  • Published:
Der Internist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Auch in der Infektionsmedizin sind maßgeschneiderte Therapien möglich, wie das Beispiel der chronischen Virushepatitis zeigt, insbesondere wenn es bereits verschiedene Therapieoptionen gibt. Bei der Hepatitis-B-Virus(HBV)-Infektion wird zunächst die Therapieindikation anhand von Virusmarkern und Leberwerten des Patienten gestellt. Anschließend wird anhand der Virus- und Patientendaten die Auswahl der Therapieform sowie die Entscheidung über das Therapieende getroffen. Zukünftig wird es vielfältigere Therapieoptionen geben, die vor allem auf die funktionale Kontrolle oder gar Elimination der chronischen HBV-Infektion abzielen und die auch die Therapiechancen bei der Hepatitis Delta erhöhen. Letztere kann bislang nur mit pegyliertem Interferon behandelt werden. Die chronische Hepatitis C ist ein Paradebeispiel für die maßgeschneiderte Therapie anhand von Virus- und Wirtsfaktoren. Die Hauptmotivation ist allerdings, Kosten zu sparen. Aufgrund der hohen Erfolgsraten der direkt antiviral wirkenden Therapie von über 95 % ist eine länderweite oder gar globale Elimination der HCV-Infektion prinzipiell möglich. Dennoch muss aufgrund der hohen Reinfektionsraten in Hochrisikogruppen sowie der mangelnden Verfügbarkeit der Medikamente weiterhin die Notwendigkeit einer Impfung oder Präexpositionsprophylaxe ernsthaft diskutiert werden. Bei der Hepatitis E gibt es bislang nicht viele Optionen. Hier ist die Therapieindividualisierung noch stark limitiert.

Abstract

Precision medicine is also possible for infectious diseases as shown for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis, especially if different options are available. In hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, treatment indication as well as the choice of treatment and the decisions to stop treatment are based on viral markers and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. Future therapies for HBV infection aiming for functional cure or even virus elimination may be even more personalized and have to take into account the immune status of a given patient. Such treatment modalities might also increase the chance for successful treatment of chronic hepatitis delta where treatment options are still very limited. Some new therapeutic concepts targeting host receptors or host enzymes are promising, but may require individualized approaches. Chronic hepatitis C is a good example for precision medicine based on viral and host factors. However, the main reason for individualized direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment is to save costs. As DAAs are effective in more than 95% of patients, elimination of HCV seems to be possible at the level of a given country or even on a global scale. However, owing to high reinfection rates in high-risk groups and limited availability of antiviral therapy in many high endemic countries, it must still be decided whether an HCV vaccine or pre-exposure prophylaxis is required to achieve this goal. Hepatitis E is an emerging topic as this is the most frequent acute hepatitis virus infection. It can result in a chronic infection in immunosuppressed individuals. Treatment options are still limited and individualized management is based on tailoring immunosuppressive therapy and therapy with ribavirin. Thus, personalized therapy of hepatitis E virus infection is still limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Cornberg M, Protzer U, Petersen J et al (2011) Prophylaxis, diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis B virus infection – the German guideline. Z Gastroenterol 49:871–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornberg M, Wong VW, Locarnini S, Brunetto M, Janssen HL, Chan HL (2017) The role of quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen revisited. J Hepatol 66:398–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Papatheodoridis G, Vlachogiannakos I, Cholongitas E et al (2016) Discontinuation of oral antivirals in chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review. Hepatology 63:1481–1492

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Höner Zu Siederdissen C, Rinker F, Maasoumy B et al (2016) Viral and host responses after stopping long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in HbeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. J Infect Dis 214:1492–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cornberg M, Wiegand SB (2016) ImPortance of IP-10 in hepatitis B. Antivir Ther (Lond) 21:93–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Bömmel F, Bartens A, Mysickova A et al (2015) Serum hepatitis B virus RNA levels as an early predictor of hepatitis B envelope antigen seroconversion during treatment with polymerase inhibitors. Hepatology 61:66–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maasoumy B, Wiegand SB, Jaroszewicz J et al (2015) Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels in the natural history of hepatitis B virus infection in a large European cohort predominantly infected with genotypes A and D. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:606.e1–606.e10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen J, Dandri M, Mier W et al (2008) Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in vivo by entry inhibitors derived from the large envelope protein. Nat Biotechnol 26(3):335–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan H, Zhong G, Xu G et al (2012) Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife 1:e00049

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogomolov P, Alexandrov A, Voronkova N et al (2016) Treatment of chronic hepatitis D with the entry inhibitor myrcludex B: first results of a phase Ib/IIa study. J Hepatol 65:490–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Urban S, Bartenschlager R, Kubitz R, Zoulim F (2014) Strategies to inhibit entry of HBV and HDV into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 147:48–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Testoni B, Durantel D, Zoulim F (2017) Novel targets for hepatitis B virus therapy. Liver Int 37(Suppl 1):33–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Decorsière A, Mueller H, van Breugel PC et al (2016) Hepatitis B virus X protein identifies the Smc5/6 complex as a host restriction factor. Nature 531:386–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lobaina Y, Michel ML (2017) Chronic hepatitis B: immunological profile and current therapeutic vaccines in clinical trials. Vaccine. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.049

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wedemeyer H, Manns MP (2010) Epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of hepatitis D: update and challenges ahead. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:31–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wranke A, Wedemeyer H (2016) Antiviral therapy of hepatitis delta virus infection – progress and challenges towards cure. Curr Opin Virol 20:112–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Calle Serrano B, Grosshennig A, Homs M et al (2014) Development and evaluation of a baseline-event-anticipation score for hepatitis delta. J Viral Hepat 21(11):e154–e163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Koh C, Canini L, Dahari H et al (2015) Oral prenylation inhibition with lonafarnib in chronic hepatitis D infection: a proof-of-concept randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2A trial. Lancet Infect Dis 15:1167–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wedemeyer H, Port K, Deterding K et al (2016) A phase 2 study of titrating-dose Lonafarnib plus Ritonavir in patients with chronic hepatitis D: interim results from the Lonafarnib with Ritonavir in HDV-4 (LOWR HDV-4) study. Hepatology 64:121A

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yurdaydin C, Idilman R, Kalkan C et al (2016) Exploring optimal dosing of Lonafarnib with Ritonavir for the treatment of chronic delta hepatitis – interim results from the Lowr HDV-2 study. Hepatology 64:910A

    Google Scholar 

  21. EASL (2017) EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2016. J Hepatol 66:153–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarrazin C, Berg T, Ross RS et al (2010) Prophylaxis, diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: the German guidelines on the management of HCV infection. Z Gastroenterol 48:289–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lau G, Benhamou Y, Chen G et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of 3‑week response-guided triple direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection: a phase 2, open-label, proof-of-concept study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cornberg M, Manns MP (2016) Hepatitis C: individualised medicine versus one pill fits all. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30029

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wedemeyer H, Duberg AS, Buti M et al (2014) Strategies to manage hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease burden. J Viral Hepat 21(Suppl 1):60–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scott N, McBryde E, Vickerman P et al (2015) The role of a hepatitis C virus vaccine: modelling the benefits alongside direct-acting antiviral treatments. BMC Med 13:198

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gower E, Estes C, Blach S, Razavi-Shearer K, Razavi H (2014) Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 61(1 Suppl):45–57

  28. Cox AL (2015) MEDICINE. Global control of hepatitis C virus. Science 349:790–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. WHO (2016) Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016–2021, towards ending viral hepatitis. http://www.who.int/hepatitis/strategy2016-2021/ghss-hep/en/. Zugegriffen: 24.5.2017

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zeng QL, Xu GH, Zhang JY et al (2017) Generic ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for patients with chronic hepatitis C: a real-life observational study. J Hepatol. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.025

    Google Scholar 

  31. He S, Lin B, Chu V et al (2015) Repurposing of the antihistamine chlorcyclizine and related compounds for treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Sci Transl Med 7:282ra49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Perin PM, Haid S, Brown RJ et al (2016) Flunarizine prevents hepatitis C virus membrane fusion in a genotype-dependent manner by targeting the potential fusion peptide within E1. Hepatology 63:49–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Khan AG, Whidby J, Miller MT et al (2014) Structure of the core ectodomain of the hepatitis C virus envelope glycoprotein 2. Nature 509:381–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kong L, Giang E, Nieusma T et al (2013) Hepatitis C virus E2 envelope glycoprotein core structure. Science 342:1090–1094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Dorner M, Horwitz JA, Donovan BM et al (2013) Completion of the entire hepatitis C virus life cycle in genetically humanized mice. Nature 501:237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pischke S, Behrendt P, Bock CT, Jilg W, Manns MP, Wedemeyer H (2014) Hepatitis E in Germany – an under-reported infectious disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int 111:577–583

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Dao Thi VL, Debing Y, Wu X et al (2016) Sofosbuvir inhibits hepatitis E virus replication in vitro and results in an additive effect when combined with Ribavirin. Gastroenterology 150:82–85.e4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Valk M, Zaaijer HL, Kater AP, Schinkel J (2017) Sofosbuvir shows antiviral activity in a patient with chronic hepatitis E virus infection. J Hepatol 66(1):242–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Cornberg.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

R. Bartenschlager gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. M. Cornberg: Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit oder Beratertätigkeit von AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk Foundation, Gilead Science, Merck (MSD), Novartis, Roche Pharma, Roche Diagnostics, Siemens. Forschungsunterstützung durch Roche Pharma. T. Pietschmann: Honorare für Vortragstätigkeit von AbbVie.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Additional information

Redaktion

D. Heinz, Braunschweig

M.P. Manns, Hannover

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bartenschlager, R., Cornberg, M. & Pietschmann, T. Maßgeschneiderte Therapie der Virushepatitis der Gegenwart und Zukunft. Internist 58, 666–674 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-017-0262-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00108-017-0262-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation